Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This develops into a general theory that attraction to both sexes is possible, but that one is more common for each sex. He explains the inversion of homosexual attraction as the result of a traumatic episode or episodes that prevent the normal development of an attraction for the opposite sex.
The quote actually says most people aren't In-between. It does not claim Bisexuality is healthier, and it also implied that homosexuality wasn't particularly healthy. I think Sigmund was wrong on this one.
So there is a fairly popular thread going about women and there inner lesbian. So I had to ask what about men and their inner homosexual. Does this exist for men? And why is it such a turn on for men to see two women together but the reverse isn't the same for women?
i think the thought that bothers hetero men about gay men is the physically invasive part. ya know the actual insertion of one body part into another. i think the thought of two men doing that grosses most men out. two chickies licking eachother just seems less invasive and less offensive. of course the thought of a man having anal sex with a woman doesn't gross most men out.
i was gonna post the question asking men how many of us men have gay thoughts? how many straight guys would admit to it if they do? i think most men have gay thoughts because i know i've had them and i think i'm basically and average american guy. i'm straight as they come but i'll admit i've wondered what it'd be like.
The quote actually says most people aren't In-between. It does not claim Bisexuality is healthier, and it also implied that homosexuality wasn't particularly healthy.
Nope. He says that all people are born bisexual and that only do to sociological factors do people become monosexual.
Quote:
Innate bisexuality (or predisposition to bisexuality) is a term introduced by Sigmund Freud, that expounds all humans are born bisexual but through psychological development (which includes both external and internal factors) become monosexual while the bisexuality remains in a latent state."
i.e., bisexuality is the "normal" course of events, but constraints by society have historically forced us to choose.
That is what he thinks.
What *I* think is that more people have a higher degree of heterosexuality because its just easier to propagate the species that way, which is the sole goal of evolution.
However, organisms either adapt to their environment or parish. I think that being bisexual is superior when it comes to adaptivity. I think bisexual tendencies are in most of us so that the "homosexual switch" can be turned on in times of over-population (just like the actual sexual organs of an animal can sometimes change when over-population of that species occurs), but that it would take many, many generations before we can see the effects of the growing homosexual population on human society.
Straight as an arrow but I have no problem going shopping with a woman, saying that a man looks handsome, etc. Doesn’t make me feel sexually/sentimentally attracted to men. It’s sort of a taboo in many parts of the world, I know, but I don’t mind.
You may think your C-D name says one thing.........but most people will read between the lines and come to a different conclusion.
What is that old saying? "Thou dost protest too much".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.