Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Also, while these men are called "womanizers," a lot of women do exactly the same things these men do with the opposite sex, and nothing is said about them.
I'm surprised you've never heard of the words "****", "*****", "skank", and "ho". And these even get applied to women who do not do the same things as a womanizer.
There's almost always some mental/mommy/daddy-type issues behind that kind of behavior...Contrary to what you may believe, there nothin right about it.
"A man who is an open womaniser and does not deceive , I really have no issue with. I don't find it a great way to lead your life but that is MY problem and my prejudice"
Agreed. All depends on the intent. An single mildly attractive woman could have sex with as many women as she likes because men are willing and able to give it to her. A mildly attractive man, not so much......which is why men (who love having sex whenever they want it) deceive, so they can do whatever however they want.
"A man who is an open womaniser and does not deceive , I really have no issue with. I don't find it a great way to lead your life but that is MY problem and my prejudice"
Agreed. All depends on the intent. An single mildly attractive woman could have sex with as many women as she likes because men are willing and able to give it to her. A mildly attractive man, not so much......which is why men (who love having sex whenever they want it) deceive, so they can do whatever however they want.
Nope. Back to the original point. A guy who moves from woman to woman, promising one thing and then moving on, is pretty much a destructive presence. Hey, if everybody recognizes its casual sex, then that's one thing. But the guys we're talking about aren't doing that. They'll say and do anything just to put another notch on the bedpost.
Oh really? How do you gather that? All indications are that this is about men who sleep around, not men who mislead.
I'm surprised you've never heard of the words "****", "*****", "skank", and "ho". And these even get applied to women who do not do the same things as a womanizer.
I have heard such words, but it is not the same as the term "womanizer."
Quote:
skank |ska ng k|
noun
1 informal a person perceived to be extremely sleazy or unpleasant.
The way I see it, a man who has casual sex with a lot of women (a womanizer), is not any worst than the women having sex with this man. All these women do is to have sex with this guy, and the next date, and the next date...just like the so called "womanizer" is doing. But I do agree with all who have said that if the man is committed to a woman, and having sex with other women, then perhaps the term "womanizer" applies. That said, my point is that we have created the term "womanizer" to put men down, while ignoring the fact that a lot of women do exactly the same thing, some through a lifetime.
I bet you every time a woman was with a womanizer, she probably passed over at least 3 normal or average guys.
Could be she did so intentionally.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
