Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Noah and his family were not giants. Noahs blood line was not tainted. Yet the rest of the world was. And that is why the world was made up of half human and half beasts like creatures. And that is why they are finding skulls like this one in the link below. Elongated Skull
Hmm, looks like, according to that link, aliens took earthly babies and wrapped their skulls throughout the babies' growing years. Oh wait, it didn't mention aliens. So they aren't half beasts afterall, although the parents could be considered beasts, I suppose. Thanks for posting. Now I won't be duped by someone posting that this is evidence of half human and half beasts like creatures.
Noah and his family were not giants. Noahs blood line was not tainted. Yet the rest of the world was. And that is why the world was made up of half human and half beasts like creatures. And that is why they are finding skulls like this one in the link below. There are numerous other examples that defy science. Yet most of these discoveries get placed deep in the scientific basements. They do this, so this evidence does not get in the way of their more acceptable theories.
You really should do some research before posting such nonsense. Elongated skulls are well - known from south america They were something of a fashion statement.
Wiki, yes I know but you can start from there. Some have seen this as evidence of Alien visitation others as something in the Bible. All nonsense as is your foolish untruth that science is dumbfounded and tries to ignore it. The only ignorance is on the part of the websites you rummage through in search of evidence for Bible - based Young - Earth creationism.
And the same goes for that giant skeleton of the OP. Long known to be a hoax.
Actually I stand corrected. This is a recent hoax. There had been another similar and older hoax.
Yes, photographs do lie and so do people. That is why we cannot accept such claims on trust and that is why extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof (sound confirmed validation). Therefore, posting pictures and videos, interesting though they might be, are no basis for making extraordinary Bible - based Creationist claims.
The people who post this stuff really ought to do the research - proper research, that is; not just cut and paste from Creationist websites. It is simply foolish to post claims that whale fossils in mountains prove anything other than that ancient sea floors - with fossil worm burrows, too - have been raised over geological ages. The Young earth and genesis - flood scenario is actually not supported by such evidence.
Well, sheeeeet...I don't discount the possibility of non-earthborn sentient people, but a human being has a finite mass that they can attain before simple things like, oh, walking without breaking your own bones under your weight are impossible. I just figure someone who can see the bible is fake has the basic intelligence and education to understand the mathematical correlation between mass and height in a human being. Geeze.
It's relatively simple math, for goodness' sake.
This same logic can be applied to T-Rex. By today's standards, such a creature would make a terrible hunter. All prey would hear (and feel) him coming from miles away. Also, his head is so large (and neck bones are so relatively small) that he would literally break his neck if he had to make a quick turn (something hunters often have to do).
My guess is that Earth had much more oxygen (and much less gravity) in our ancient past. As for the "giant Humans", they were not Earth born humans. This is why they are so controversial. They are literally solid evidence that we have been visited in our past (and such evidence is still a "no no"). In short, they were not "humans" like us; therefore the correlation between mass and height for us would not apply for them.
So you're not aware of the difference between the human skeletal structure and t-rex's then, are you?
Quote:
As for the "giant Humans", they were not Earth born humans. This is why they are so controversial. They are literally solid evidence that we have been visited in our past (and such evidence is still a "no no"). In short, they were not "humans" like us; therefore the correlation between mass and height for us would not apply for them.
So you're not aware of the difference between the human skeletal structure and t-rex's then, are you?
It is not polite to tell someone what they know and what they don't. FWIW, I stand by my statements. T-Rex is evidence that Earth's gravity might have been much less in our ancient past. He is also evidence that Earth might have had much more oxygen. Keep in mind that EVERYTHING grew taller and larger back during his time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury Cougar
Prove it.
For every source that has this info, there is a counter-source that tries to "debunk" it. Now, use your brain. Why on Earth would someone spend millions of dollars trying to debunk something that isn't true? For someone like myself, I tend to believe something the most when it has tons of "skeptics" and "debunkers" surrounding it.
Let's keep in mind that at one point, people that taught about a "round Earth" were debunked and ridiculed too. So were the people that thought space travel for humans was possible. Early explorers that found the "New World" were debunked and ridiculed for even trying (it was thought that they would sail off of the "Earth's edge"). My point is that history repeats itself.
Today, we are still living in the "age of ignorance". In this age (the age of ignorance) we still believe that science is the only way (and spirituality isn't real). We believe that Earth has never been visited by others. We still believe in Gods that aren't real. We still believe that one can prepare for and prevent war at the same time (even Einstein told us such a thing was impossible). We also believe that our Government controlled media and scientific community will tell us the absolute truth about everything that they find in the ground.
Hopefully, 2012 (if anything) will be the start of the "Age of Enlightenment" because I am personally tired of this current age.
They were the offspring, (OF FALLEN ANGELS), and they became like monsters. And the rebuttal of the alien skull is only accepted by those who want to believe this was only the result of head binding. Yet when one looks close at one of those skulls, you would have to be a blind man not to see the other strange features found in those skulls. And those strange features, would have nothing to do with head binding.
T-Rex is evidence that Earth's gravity might have been much less in our ancient past. He is also evidence that Earth might have had much more oxygen. Keep in mind that EVERYTHING grew taller and larger back during his time.
Gravity has to do with mass and density. The greater the mass and density, the stronger the gravitational pull. It has absolutely nothing to do with T-Rex's size. The mass of the Earth during the reign of the dinosaurs, etc., would have been similar to what it is today. Any difference would be very slight.
You are also incorrect to say "...EVERYTHING grew taller and larger..." back then. That's not so. While there were indeed very large plants and animals back then, there were also very small plants and animals as well. They just don't always attract as much public attention as the impressively large ones do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So they aren't half beasts afterall, although the parents could be considered beasts, I suppose.
Thanks for posting. Now I won't be duped by someone posting that this is evidence of half human and half beasts like creatures.
They need to do a 12 footer with elongated skull though.
