Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2016, 09:17 PM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
31,373 posts, read 20,168,052 times
Reputation: 14069

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruithne View Post
It's a very interesting theory, to me very much in the same ball-park as a comment TroutDude made a few weeks ago about a god that is maybe 'evolving with us' (did I get that right TroutDude?)

...snip....

Sorry I know I'm joshing with you a bit but actually as god theories go I actually think it makes some sense. Really one of you guys should start a thread on it.
Yes, it's a concept I've been mulling more and more often of late.

But I don't see it as having any connection at all to that ridiculous deity conjured up in the bible. Or any deity described anywhere.

I think it more and more likely that this "growing collection of consciousness" is unaware of itself as a separate being from anything else - perhaps because it is not apart from anything.

But everything is a part of it.

Maybe.

Ish.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2016, 09:27 PM
 
63,779 posts, read 40,038,426 times
Reputation: 7868
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroutDude View Post
Yes, it's a concept I've been mulling more and more often of late.
But I don't see it as having any connection at all to that ridiculous deity conjured up in the bible. Or any deity described anywhere.
I think it more and more likely that this "growing collection of consciousness" is unaware of itself as a separate being from anything else - perhaps because it is not apart from anything.
But everything is a part of it.
Maybe.
Ish.
It is NOT apart from anything and its love and acceptance of all life is unconditional, of that I am certain. Everything else is moot. I fully expect to find out, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2016, 11:07 PM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,062,204 times
Reputation: 1359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkins View Post
Yes, it has all to do with God's legal system. It's your mistake to fail to comprehend.

1 John 3:4 (NIV)
Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact, sin is lawlessness.
Being born into a subjective law that you can't escape is supposed to be fair?
Such Politics of Heaven are quite a self-inflicting contradiction. They can be both sadistic and masochistic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2016, 03:36 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,087 posts, read 20,691,451 times
Reputation: 5928
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroutDude View Post
Yes, it's a concept I've been mulling more and more often of late.

But I don't see it as having any connection at all to that ridiculous deity conjured up in the bible. Or any deity described anywhere.

I think it more and more likely that this "growing collection of consciousness" is unaware of itself as a separate being from anything else - perhaps because it is not apart from anything.

But everything is a part of it.

Maybe.

Ish.

The whole agnostic -sortagod -belief is indeed quite remote fro personal gods. Which is oe reason why "agnostics" and atheists ore really on the same side. You have a god belief..Sorta...but not a religion.

Mystic, uniquely so far as I can tell, has a way of bringing the NT back into it as God's latest step in our "spiritual evolution". Do you think you could 'mull' your way to buying into that idea?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2016, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
31,373 posts, read 20,168,052 times
Reputation: 14069
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
The whole agnostic -sortagod -belief is indeed quite remote fro personal gods. Which is oe reason why "agnostics" and atheists ore really on the same side. You have a god belief..Sorta...but not a religion.

Mystic, uniquely so far as I can tell, has a way of bringing the NT back into it as God's latest step in our "spiritual evolution". Do you think you could 'mull' your way to buying into that idea?
LOL. Not a chance.

Although, I think the idealized, liberal Jesus - the rebel with a cause who promoted love, tolerance, forgiveness etc. is not a bad role model for folks to follow.

I just don't believe he worked miracles or was any more godly than any of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2016, 09:17 AM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,567,423 times
Reputation: 2070
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroutDude View Post
Yes, it's a concept I've been mulling more and more often of late.

But I don't see it as having any connection at all to that ridiculous deity conjured up in the bible. Or any deity described anywhere.

I think it more and more likely that this "growing collection of consciousness" is unaware of itself as a separate being from anything else - perhaps because it is not apart from anything.

But everything is a part of it.

Maybe.

Ish.

that nails trout.

I am writing you in;in novemeber.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2016, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,515 posts, read 84,688,123 times
Reputation: 114969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruithne View Post
If I failed to comprehend then perhaps you didn't explain yourself clearly.
You are referring to what you term 'Gods legal system'. In that case you need to make a distinction between this and what you referred to as 'today's legal term' implying that what you read in the bible somehow has something to do with today's legal system, which clearly it does not.
Today's legal system doesn't look too kindly on slavery for example.

It might help if perhaps you could be more specific about what you consider to be 'Gods law' and what you consider sinful. Are you talking about the 10 commandments say or the entirety of the bible?
I think it means the 613 Jewish laws of the Torah. Which are for...Jews.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2016, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,515 posts, read 84,688,123 times
Reputation: 114969
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
I would want a bit more.Just sitting 'fine with where I am' (as someone posted) satisfied with assuming there is some 'collective purpose' would be like...
"Because".
No, I need to look further and consider what this purpose could be, whether there needs to be one and indeed what the term even means. That is why I say rational and evidence- based enquiry is actually going further than accepting a big unknown, regarding it as some kind of deity, and refusing to look further and even denigrating those who do. No,I would want a bit more.
To clarify, I too want a bit more, more than a bit, which is why I found myself on this liberal Christian path that's open to input from other traditions and cultures.

What I meant was that if it turns out I'm completely wrong and savoring this life is the end game, I'm ok with that. Hell I wouldn't have a choice!

I do think there is more, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2016, 09:39 AM
 
2,826 posts, read 2,366,623 times
Reputation: 1011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruithne View Post
As an atheist I don't believe in the concept of sin.
I just believe that people should respect one another, be nice to one another and not hurt one another or other animals.
The Golden Rule basically.

As long as people live by this I'm basically good with how people live their lives.

I can't remember the thread or the poster now but I noted the other day an atheist using the term 'sin' as though it were a thing, presumably a remnant from a past history as a Christian.

I'm interested to know if other religions other than Christianity hold with the concept of sin?

For once I didn't find wikipedia particularly helpful on the subject. It's a bit vague from the perspective of religions other than Christianity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sin

Please no meanness / prosthelytzing or lecturing me or anyone else that they are going to hell for being an atheist in this thread. That's so missing the point.
Otherwise please contribute from an educational perspective. Thanks.
I don't believe in sin either. The concept of sin is basically from pre-Christian guilt mentality.

Judaism was an orthopraxy (right practices) rather than an orthodoxy (right beliefs) meaning, if you did things wrong, you were a sinner or evil or whatever. Interestingly, after the death of Jesus, and for 40 years until the temple fell, certain miracles wouldn't work.

Talmudic Evidence for the Messiah at 30 C.E.

This is because Jesus, and not right actions, became the new sacrifice for atonement of sin. Given this, unless we believe that a Messiah is to continually be sacrificed, your sins are forgiven. That means sin is kinda moot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2016, 11:44 AM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,062,204 times
Reputation: 1359
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulmabriefs144 View Post
I don't believe in sin either. The concept of sin is basically from pre-Christian guilt mentality.

Judaism was an orthopraxy (right practices) rather than an orthodoxy (right beliefs) meaning, if you did things wrong, you were a sinner or evil or whatever. Interestingly, after the death of Jesus, and for 40 years until the temple fell, certain miracles wouldn't work.

Talmudic Evidence for the Messiah at 30 C.E.

This is because Jesus, and not right actions, became the new sacrifice for atonement of sin. Given this, unless we believe that a Messiah is to continually be sacrificed, your sins are forgiven. That means sin is kinda moot.
Flip-flopping gods; like flip-flopping humans. A lot of Jews have told me that animal sacrificed were "for the people" to control themselves and not for God. It was necessary because it was harder for people to look for forgiveness and rightification in their proper ways back then (plus a non-vegetarian temple workforce has to eat).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top