Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-24-2021, 11:53 AM
 
18,703 posts, read 33,369,579 times
Reputation: 37253

Advertisements

^^^^^ Then do some people have a portfolio for major emergencies or what? A sincere desire to leave an estate to someone? What is the point, may I ask?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-24-2021, 11:54 AM
 
18,703 posts, read 33,369,579 times
Reputation: 37253
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
you cant evaluate a situation without looking at the options .
I don't evaluate my house situation based on how much money is involved or growing. If I did, I'd be in a very different situation all along.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2021, 11:55 AM
 
106,583 posts, read 108,739,314 times
Reputation: 80063
Quote:
Originally Posted by brightdoglover View Post
^^^^^ Then do some people have a portfolio for major emergencies or what? A sincere desire to leave an estate to someone? What is the point, may I ask?
to live on .

ss accounts only for 28% of our budget .

our own money has to be pensionized to provide a self created pension .

that is the job of many portfolios , to provide a safe , secure income stream that fills the gap in spending needs .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2021, 11:59 AM
 
18,703 posts, read 33,369,579 times
Reputation: 37253
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
to live on .

ss accounts only for 28% of our budget .

our own money has to be pensionized to provide a self created pension .

that is the job of many portfolios , to provide a safe , secure income stream that fills the gap in spending needs .

Do people with regular pensions also want portfolios for additional income?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2021, 12:11 PM
 
3,254 posts, read 1,410,291 times
Reputation: 3687
In general I think homeownership offers several benefits over renting….they certainly aren’t universal truths, but I think they generally hold true.

(1) Being a homeowner generally provides for a higher quality living experience. It is your home, you can do pretty much what you want in terms of painting, remodeling, etc. My own experience has been that nicest places I have ever lived (both in terms of the structures and neighborhoods) have been when I have lived in non-rental properties. I have no doubt that there are absolutely plenty of rentals that are nicer and in better neighborhoods than any home I have ever owned, but I think for the common person in most situations, owner occupied housing is nicer.

(2) Owning a home provides one with an asset that helps to hedge against inflation and helps to diversify your asset base. If you have a fixed rate mortgage and inflation amps up, your future payments tend to be lower in real terms. To the extent inflation impacts the price of rental housing, you are protected against that increase as well. The house itself will likely serve as a hedge against inflation, and real estate may not always be correlated with the returns of other financial assets, so you get the benefit of reducing the variance/risk of your entire financial portfolio.

(3) Generally speaking residential owner occupied real estate gets some preferential tax treatment at the time of sale. I am not 100% certain, but I believe the current tax rules allow for a couple to exclude $500,000 of any capital gain from the sale of a primary residence from their income tax.

I know there are downsides to ownership…..relatively high cost of buying/selling property, aggravation of home maintenance for many people, the owner absorbs all of the risk of real estate price drops whereas the renter has no risk, easier to pick up and go if renting. All are certainly valid reasons to rent. I think in total, though, homeownership suits me better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2021, 12:16 PM
 
18,703 posts, read 33,369,579 times
Reputation: 37253
I have never wanted to live through the pricing-out real estate wars again after multiple runs. I'd own a condo before I'd rent again. Where I've lived, rentals go through the roof or get sold out from under. It's not tenable in a lot of areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2021, 12:54 PM
 
1,780 posts, read 1,203,545 times
Reputation: 4054
Quote:
Originally Posted by brightdoglover View Post
Do people with regular pensions also want portfolios for additional income?

Yes because my regular pension will be only 20%-30% of my salary from working. Also it has no adjustment for inflation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2021, 01:02 PM
 
8,333 posts, read 4,375,272 times
Reputation: 11982
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
by the same token owning may be no safer or comforting then not owning and having all that cash spinning off a hefty income . so whats your point then with the cant live in a portfolio comment ?

that portfolio from selling that house , pays all living expenses while renting so it does not even make sense .... it is a senseless comment in that respect because having that money in that portfolio can pay for whatever one needs.

you dont live in a portfolio , you live off a portfolio .

The point of my comment (that I can't live in a portfolio) is that I can't live in a portfolio, what other point could there be? :-) A portfolio is not a home, it is not any kind of physical shelter from elements and other intrusions from the outside. The need for a physical shelter is one of the essential human survival needs, while the need for a portfolio isn't. You can live off of various stuff, but you can't physically live inside things that do not provide shelter. A housing provides physical shelter, in addition to also having a financial value. No, you can't use that financial value to pay your ongoing daily expenses, but you can use it to decrease your ongoing housing expenses by at least half and usually more than half (compared with rentals), and you can store the increasing value of the home you own for future needs - all of that while actually using the home as a physical shelter.

The most specific subject of the thread is whether to fully own your home, or pay a small deposit and take a mortgage that (a) may be cheap to pay off over the years due to low % interest on mortgages (at least low compared with % inflation), and/or (b) you are not even planning to pay it off since you might die much earlier than the end of mortgage, and you don't care if the bank takes your cheaply acquired last home after you are dead.

My position is that (in addition to my preference to own my own space, and to not think about debt) I like the fact my home ownership (which happens to consist of 3 condos far apart from each other :-) greatly decreases my monthly cost of housing (compared with rental), particularly during inflation, plus has some other travel-related financial benefits, and increases my total value of assets even though I am actively using some of those assets for living in them, which increase would be also particularly major after an interval of high inflation. None of this would matter if I knew that I would drop dead next month, or next year, but a lot of people in my family have lived very long, I resemble those people physically and healthwise, and I have to consider a possibility of a long haul. So, I don't believe I can even think about NOT owning my home free and clear until I am either very ill, or about 95 years old.

In other words, I would finally sell my home only to maximize supplemental funds in my final years - but I would need to know with reasonable probability that they are my final years. Otherwise, I do not see a point in either paying rent, or paying back a mortgage, every month.

Last edited by elnrgby; 12-24-2021 at 01:17 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2021, 01:28 PM
 
335 posts, read 227,326 times
Reputation: 338
I imagine many people will live fine with their home and incomes only. Knowing the spending habits of a lot of people with big portfolios, it’s not likely they will use much of it.
Old habits die hard.
It provides the security of the unknowns old age may bring. Health being the biggie. And leaving inheritances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2021, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Redwood City, CA
15,250 posts, read 12,949,985 times
Reputation: 54051
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAhippo View Post
and there is nothing wrong with having a hippopotamus habit.
Oh, definitely!

(I walked right into that one, didn't I...)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top