Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-03-2022, 02:32 PM
 
50,779 posts, read 36,474,703 times
Reputation: 76577

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by springfieldva View Post
The teenagers who do work pay into social security just like every other worker does. Most do not have access to a 401K plan because they don't work FT hours. Why? Because they are still in school and it is important for them to complete their education.

I would rather see a teenager focus on doing the things necessary to keep their college debt to a minimum - taking college credit classes in HS, earning merit scholarships, working PT to have money for their living expenses, taking online class, commuting from home as opposed to living on campus, graduating early. If they can graduate college debt free they will be setting themselves up well for their futures.

HS/College really isn't the time to focus on retirement savings. The exception would be the HS grads who go straight into the military or other FT career position like law enforcement, corrections, etc
Many companies no long match 401Ks, either. My current employer doesn't. My last didn't, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2022, 02:33 PM
 
17,376 posts, read 16,518,282 times
Reputation: 29030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Free-R View Post
If I maxed my 401K the rest of my working career, I can burn every other dollar I ever make and still retire a multi-millionaire, so I should have enough to cover my needs by that point, although there is no guarantee. That means I will have the option of having a home aide or living in an ASL; it just depends on what my medical needs will be at that time. Three out of the four grandparents lived until mid-80s. The one that didn't I think would have lived to that age with modern medical care, but can't say for sure.

More recently, my uncle served as essentially a home aide to his friend girl that he really cared about. He used her government benefits to help move her closer to him so she could have her own living quarters. He took her to all of her appointments, and there were a lot of them. Eventually when it came to end-of-life care (a different topic than this thread), he got Medicaid to pay for it because her assets were spent down to zero. What he explained to me was that you can't qualify for that type of Medicaid care unless your assets are spent down to zero. Ergo, if I run out of money, which I don't think will happen, I suppose Medicaid will pick up the tab?



I have spent zero time researching how 100-year-olds and above are taken care of, but it's an interesting question, because they're still alive at 100+ and someone is helping them. Their kids most likely are definitely dead by then.
I suppose that nursing homes care for 100 year olds the same way that they care for their 85 year old "kids" or even their 65 year old grandkids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2022, 02:35 PM
 
17,376 posts, read 16,518,282 times
Reputation: 29030
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
Many companies no long match 401Ks, either. My current employer doesn't. My last didn't, either.
That is definitely something to think about when comparing job offers. There are still companies that match.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2022, 02:36 PM
 
50,779 posts, read 36,474,703 times
Reputation: 76577
Quote:
Originally Posted by springfieldva View Post
I just pointed out that the government does, in fact, pay for our seniors.
Medicare isn't free (are you thinking of Medicaid?). You have to pay for Part B (outpatient medical care like therapy, medical equipment, etc) and if you don't pay for a supplemental to part A you will have big co-pays. They are quite expensive. Advantage Plans are free in terms of premium, but also come with hefty co-pays. Social Security and Medicare though are both programs workers pay into for decades. It may not match what you get, but it's not really the government "giving you" something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2022, 02:44 PM
 
17,376 posts, read 16,518,282 times
Reputation: 29030
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
Medicare isn't free (are you thinking of Medicaid?). You have to pay for Part B (outpatient medical care like therapy, medical equipment, etc) and if you don't pay for a supplemental to part A you will have big co-pays. They are quite expensive. Advantage Plans are free in terms of premium, but also come with hefty co-pays. Social Security and Medicare though are both programs workers pay into for decades. It may not match what you get, but it's not really the government "giving you" something.
Medicare and Social Security are only available to those 65+. I wasn't saying that Medicare covers the costs of assisted living. It's more that SS provides an income while Medicare covers healthcare - why can't those two resources be used more effectively for people who can no longer care for themselves? Too often we see the elderly becoming caregivers to their sick spouses because they don't want to lose their life savings. That's a heck of a thing to put old people through.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2022, 03:00 PM
 
Location: Fiorina "Fury" 161
3,531 posts, read 3,732,527 times
Reputation: 6604
Quote:
Originally Posted by springfieldva View Post
I suppose that nursing homes care for 100 year olds the same way that they care for their 85 year old "kids" or even their 65 year old grandkids.
That wasn't your question, which I went on to sufficiently answer in that I would have options depending on my health needs, irrespective of my current age post-retirement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by springfieldva View Post
Who do you expect to take care of you when your own money runs out?

Quote:
Will you expect your 85 year old "kid" to help you?
Will you be calling a "pick up service" to come every time that you've fallen and you can't get up?
'Suppose in your glibness you want "specifics." I won't rely on either my kids (don't have any currently) or the government to take care of me.

Free-R, out!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2022, 03:02 PM
 
12,062 posts, read 10,271,962 times
Reputation: 24801
Quote:
Originally Posted by springfieldva View Post
Medicare and Social Security are only available to those 65+. I wasn't saying that Medicare covers the costs of assisted living. It's more that SS provides an income while Medicare covers healthcare - why can't those two resources be used more effectively for people who can no longer care for themselves? Too often we see the elderly becoming caregivers to their sick spouses because they don't want to lose their life savings. That's a heck of a thing to put old people through.
you can start Social Security at 62.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2022, 03:03 PM
 
12,062 posts, read 10,271,962 times
Reputation: 24801
Quote:
Originally Posted by springfieldva View Post
I suppose that nursing homes care for 100 year olds the same way that they care for their 85 year old "kids" or even their 65 year old grandkids.
We just celebrated the 100th birthday of a WW2 veteran at the state veterans home. They take great care of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2022, 03:17 PM
 
17,376 posts, read 16,518,282 times
Reputation: 29030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clemencia53 View Post
you can start Social Security at 62.
Yes, I meant to say that the combination of Medicare and Social Security is available to those 65 up who qualify for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2022, 03:23 PM
 
17,376 posts, read 16,518,282 times
Reputation: 29030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clemencia53 View Post
We just celebrated the 100th birthday of a WW2 veteran at the state veterans home. They take great care of them.
They should take good care of him. The guy has served his country and lived a long life.

But I would hope that a 100 year old former teacher would also be well taken care of. She, too, has given valuable service to her country. Same could be said for all 100 year olds, they have seen a lot in their lives and they have each made their own unique contributions to their communities and to their country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top