Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't see anything about Kolar's report on Woodward's website about the DNA. Please let us know on what page you find it.
I do see the CODIS profile of distal stain 007-2, unknown male #1, taken from the blood mixed in her underwear, which was deduced by the Denver Police Department and submitted to Bode by the Boulder County DA's office in December, 2007 via a PowerPoint slide and June, 2008 via a Specimen Detail Report.
I don't recall stating there were anything in Woodwards book about DNA Kolar spoke about in his book. You have compaired official report in Woodwards book against Kolars DNA statements in his book, right?
Kolar does takes it further going into the number of markers in each peice of DNA evidence.
Ask John Ramsey why he said he didn't know you;
availble on acandyrose under Stines, questions asked by Lou Smit. Anyone who reads it has an ahha moment thinking you might just be full of it.
I'll add, from where and how the site acquires photos isn't something most readers focus on.
He didn't know me before the murder.
As for the photos, Acandyrose posted on her site that those were my photos, she knew I had taken them, my visit to Boulder and activities there were quite well followed since Frank Coffman and others were reporting all.
But, like I said, you feel free to think what you like.
As for the photos, Acandyrose posted on her site that those were my photos, she knew I had taken them, my visit to Boulder and activities there were quite well followed since Frank Coffman and others were reporting all.
But, like I said, you feel free to think what you like.
I didn't read Ramseys book 'Death of Innocence' , however you did say you've been acknowledged in their book; I'll take your word. I know you've spoken on their behalf what you believe to be truth; we just don't agree on many points.
How does Woodward know what went on in Grand Jury presentations?
No one said she did.
However, it would be logical to conclude that if the BPD could not get the "enhanced" tape to play a couple of months before the GJ, it would most likely not be used, would it?
The Ramseys having to change their phone number because of her calls, which wasn't the case. That's pointed out in the deposition.
In my opin Lou Smit attempted establishing John didn't know jameson on a personal level, why he asked if he knew her from the internet puzzling; as far as I knew John or Patsy Ramsey never posted in internet forums??
The line of questioning was in reference to jameson; so then theres absolutely no reason for Johns mention of the number change...but thats John Ramsey for ya, it gives him wiggle room later.
It was someone's OPINION on another forum, period.
I got that; evidently it's a tid bit you felt worth posting to throw in doubt of his book.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
