I can't take it anymore. (grammar, quote, difference)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Another poster reminded me of one that drives me crazy, (they wrote it correctly):
What about when people use "they" as a singular pronoun? Just kidding--I occasionally do it too out of necessity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow
Finally, I probably posted this one before, (so hard to keep track, so many misspellings, so little time!):
"I'm going to not do that."
No! No, no, no, no, NO!
"I'm NOT going to do that."
Keep this in mind:
"To be or NOTto be."
It is not:
"To be or to not be."
I'm unsure whether you are talking about a split infinitive, which really is okay, or just the placement of "not." I don't know about the example you posted, because "I'm not going to do that" sounds fine, but sometimes the "not" has to go somewhere funny for accuracy or effect.
Compare the following:
I think that you should not call her.
I don't think that you should call her.
I will tell her to not call me anymore.
I will not tell her to call me anymore.
The odd "not" is sometimes needed to emphasize deliberately not doing something.
What about when people use "they" as a singular pronoun? Just kidding--I occasionally do it too out of necessity.
I'm unsure whether you are talking about a split infinitive, which really is okay, or just the placement of "not." I don't know about the example you posted, because "I'm not going to do that" sounds fine, but sometimes the "not" has to go somewhere funny for accuracy or effect.
Compare the following:
I think that you should not call her.
I don't think that you should call her.
I will tell her to not call me anymore.
I will not tell her to call me anymore.
The odd "not" is sometimes needed to emphasize deliberately not doing something.
I had a very pleasant chat with my former English teacher the other day (I left High School in 1973). He remarked, during the chat, that my generation was the last one to be 'taught' English grammar in the old fashioned way. What the OP is commenting on is the result of changing attitudes and standards in teaching the English language since then.
um... no, my second grader knows the difference, she has been taught... there certainly hasn't been a change in teaching the difference between your and you're that I am aware of. I can understand an occasional typo, but in printed material.... unacceptable. I hope you promptly returned it!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.