BREEZE CAFE, 2171 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus, OH 43229 - Restaurant inspection findings and violations



Business Info

Restaurant: BREEZE CAFE
Address: 2171 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus, OH 43229
Total inspections: 19
Last inspection: Nov 15, 2012
Score
(the higher the better)

90

Restaurant representatives - add corrected or new information about BREEZE CAFE, 2171 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus, OH 43229 »


Inspection findings

Inspection Type

Inspection Date

Inspection Score
(the higher the better)

  • Equipment components were not intact, tight or properly adjusted.
  • Food items are not protected from contamination during storage.
  • Food-contact surfaces were dirty. [multiple violations]
  • Handwashing sink is being used for purposes other than handwashing.
  • In-use utensils are improperly stored.
  • Nonfood-contact surfaces are not cleaned frequently enough.
  • Ready-to-eat food was not protected from cross-contamination by separation from raw animal food.
  • The person in charge is not ensuring that employees are properly sanitizing equipment or utensils.
  • There is no test kit available for measuring the concentration of the sanitizer.
  • Time/temperature controlled for safety food was improperly thawed.
Standard Inspection Mar 26, 2010 77
  • A direct connection exists between the sewage system and a drain originating from equipment in which food, portable equipment, or utensils are placed.
  • A handwashing sign was not posted at all handwashing sinks.
  • After use, mops are not placed in a position that allows them to air-dry without soiling walls, equipment, or supplies.
  • Each handwashing sink did not have a supply of hand cleaning liquid, powder or bar soap.
  • Equipment components were not intact, tight or properly adjusted.
  • Equipment is not approved by a recognized agency or authority.
  • Food-contact surfaces were dirty.
  • Light bulbs were not shielded, coated, or otherwise shatter-resistant in areas where there is exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, or linens; or unwrapped single-service or single-use articles.
  • Plumbing system is not maintained in good repair.
  • Ready-to-eat food was not protected from cross-contamination by separation from raw animal food.
  • Temperature measuring devices are missing, not correctly placed, not readable, or of improper design.
  • The operator did not have a food thermometer readily accessible.
  • The operator is using unapproved alternative manual warewashing equipment.
  • The person in charge is not ensuring that employees are properly sanitizing equipment or utensils. [multiple violations]
  • The physical facilities are not cleaned as often as necessary. [multiple violations]
  • The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests is not being adequately controlled or minimized.
  • There is no test kit available for measuring the concentration of the sanitizer.
  • Wood or wood wicker was used as a food-contact surface.
Followup Inspection Apr 16, 2010 60
  • After use, mops are not placed in a position that allows them to air-dry without soiling walls, equipment, or supplies.
  • Cleaning and maintenance of plumbing fixtures: Handwashing sinks are not being kept clean, and maintained and used as specified under O.A.C. §3717-1-05.1(O).
  • Equipment components were not intact, tight or properly adjusted.
  • Food-contact surfaces were dirty.
  • Light bulbs were not shielded, coated, or otherwise shatter-resistant in areas where there is exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, or linens; or unwrapped single-service or single-use articles.
  • Refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature controlled for safety food that is prepared in the food facility and held refrigerated for more than 24 hours is not properly date marked.
  • Temperature measuring devices are missing, not correctly placed, not readable, or of improper design.
  • The operator did not have a food thermometer readily accessible.
  • The windows or doors were not protected against the entry of insects and rodents.
  • There is no test kit available for measuring the concentration of the sanitizer.
  • Time/temperature controlled for safety foods were being held at temperatures above 41 °F (5°C).. [multiple violations]
  • Unsafe food was not discarded or properly reconditioned
Followup Inspection May 5, 2010 67
No violation noted during this evaluation. - May 7, 2010 100
  • Cleaning and maintenance of plumbing fixtures: Handwashing sinks are not being kept clean, and maintained and used as specified under O.A.C. §3717-1-05.1(O).
  • Equipment is not approved by a recognized agency or authority.
  • Light bulbs were not shielded, coated, or otherwise shatter-resistant in areas where there is exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, or linens; or unwrapped single-service or single-use articles.
  • The operator does not have a readily accessible thermometer capable of accurately measuring the temperature in thin foods.
  • The windows or doors were not protected against the entry of insects and rodents.
Followup Inspection Jun 2, 2010 95
  • Cleaning and maintenance of plumbing fixtures: Handwashing sinks are not being kept clean, and maintained and used as specified under O.A.C. §3717-1-05.1(O).
  • Equipment components were not intact, tight or properly adjusted.
  • Light bulbs were not shielded, coated, or otherwise shatter-resistant in areas where there is exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, or linens; or unwrapped single-service or single-use articles.
  • Plumbing system is not repaired according to the Ohio Building Code.
  • The operator did not have a food thermometer readily accessible.
  • The windows or doors were not protected against the entry of insects and rodents.
  • Time/temperature controlled for safety food was improperly thawed.
Inspection Other Jun 22, 2010 93
  • Food-contact surfaces were dirty.
  • The operator did not have a food thermometer readily accessible.
  • There is no test kit available for measuring the concentration of the sanitizer.
Inspection Other Aug 4, 2010 93
  • Equipment and/or components were not maintained in good working order.
  • The consumer was not properly advised of the risk of consuming raw or undercooked animal foods.
  • The person in charge is not ensuring that employees prevent cross-contamination of ready-to-eat food with bare hands.
  • The physical facilities are not cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean.
Standard Inspection Oct 15, 2010 92
No violation noted during this evaluation. Followup Inspection Dec 6, 2010 100
  • A direct connection exists between the sewage system and a drain originating from equipment in which food, portable equipment, or utensils are placed.
  • Cloths use for wiping counters and other equipment surfaces are not laundered daily [as specified in OAC õõ3717-1-04.7].
  • Each handwashing sink did not have a supply of hand cleaning liquid, powder or bar soap.
  • Equipment and/or components were not maintained in good working order.
  • Equipment components were not intact, tight or properly adjusted.
  • Food items are not protected from contamination during storage.
  • Food-contact surfaces were dirty.
  • In-use utensils are improperly stored.
  • Light bulbs were not shielded, coated, or otherwise shatter-resistant in areas where there is exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, or linens; or unwrapped single-service or single-use articles.
  • Material characteristics of utensils and or food contact surfaces do not meet standards.
  • Nonfood-contact surfaces are not cleaned frequently enough.
  • Outdoor refuse containers do not contain tight-fitting lids, doors, or covers.
  • Ready-to-eat food was not protected from cross-contamination by separation from raw animal food.
  • The air gap between a plumbing fixture and a piece of equipment is not sufficient to prevent back siphonage of contaminated water.
  • The operator did not have a food thermometer readily accessible.
  • Time/temperature controlled for safety foods were being held at temperatures above 41 °F (5°C)..
  • Unsafe food was not discarded or properly reconditioned
Standard Inspection May 11, 2011 55
No violation noted during this evaluation. Complaint Inspection May 11, 2011 100
No violation noted during this evaluation. - May 11, 2011 100
  • After use, mops are not placed in a position that allows them to air-dry without soiling walls, equipment, or supplies.
  • Each handwashing sink did not have a supply of hand cleaning liquid, powder or bar soap.
  • Each handwashing sink did not provide individual, disposable towels; a continuous towel system that supplies the user with a clean towel; or a heated-air hand drying device.
  • Equipment components were not intact, tight or properly adjusted.
  • Handwashing sink is being used for purposes other than handwashing.
  • Light bulbs were not shielded, coated, or otherwise shatter-resistant in areas where there is exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, or linens; or unwrapped single-service or single-use articles.
  • Refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature controlled for safety food that is prepared in the food facility and held refrigerated for more than 24 hours is not properly date marked.
  • Unsafe food was not discarded or properly reconditioned
Standard Inspection Sep 20, 2011 84
No violation noted during this evaluation. Followup Inspection Oct 4, 2011 100
No violation noted during this evaluation. Complaint Inspection Jun 7, 2012 100
  • Equipment is not approved by a recognized agency or authority.
  • Non-food contact surfaces are dirty.
  • The light intensity was not at least 50 foot candles (540 lux) on a surface where a food employee is working with food, utensils or equipment where employee safety is a factor.
Standard Inspection Aug 10, 2012 97
No violation noted during this evaluation. Complaint Inspection Sep 19, 2012 100
  • A direct connection exists between the sewage system and a drain originating from equipment in which food, portable equipment, or utensils are placed.
  • Equipment and/or components were not maintained in good working order.
  • Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils were not properly sanitized.
  • Equipment is not approved by a recognized agency or authority.
  • Handwashing sink is being used for purposes other than handwashing.
  • Light bulbs were not shielded, coated, or otherwise shatter-resistant in areas where there is exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, or linens; or unwrapped single-service or single-use articles.
  • Nonfood-contact surfaces are not cleaned frequently enough.
  • The physical facilities are not cleaned as often as necessary.
  • The physical facilities were not maintained in good repair. [multiple violations]
  • There is no test kit available for measuring the concentration of the sanitizer.
  • Ventilation systems were inadequate.
Standard Inspection Oct 26, 2012 83
  • Equipment and/or components were not maintained in good working order.
  • Equipment is not approved by a recognized agency or authority.
  • Plumbing system is not maintained in good repair.
  • The physical facilities were not maintained in good repair. [multiple violations]
Followup Inspection Nov 15, 2012 90

Violation descriptions and comments

Mar 26, 2010

PIC Tiffany. Need to check on food license. Updated Green Sign.

Apr 16, 2010

PIC Reagat. PIC stated that she is PIC trained. 2 of the critical, are repeat violations. I will discuss with my supervisor about starting the enforcement process. Owner was called to explain violations.

May 5, 2010

PIC Kifle. Updated Green Sign. Several foods in the cooler was for an employee party. Discarded. Facility will be referred to enforcement due to repeat violations and new criticals.

May 7, 2010

Delivered Pre-hearing letter, and posted Yellow Sign.

Jun 2, 2010

PIC Kevin Robinson. Issued Green Sign. Gaskets were just received from UPS. All critical violations were correct at the the of inspection. Thanks.

Jun 22, 2010

PIC Kevin Robinson. Updated Green Sign.

Aug 4, 2010

PIC Danilla. Updated green sign.

Oct 15, 2010

PIC Stephanie available for inspection. Green sign updated. She has just taken over as the new manager, so we spent time going over handouts and requirements of the food code. I gave the staff information on level one and serve safe training. Hair restraints and gloves were in use. Handsink accessible. Facility generally clean and well maintained. Stephanie will fax me a copy of the menu once the consumer advisory has been added. Thank you!

Dec 6, 2010

PIC Mike. Critical violation was correct at the the of re-inspection. breezecafe@yahoo.com

May 11, 2011

PIC -Stephanie

May 11, 2011

PIC: Stephanie
Complaint- NCFA

May 11, 2011

inspection w/ Ben.

Sep 20, 2011

PIC- Christina
Updated green sign.

Oct 4, 2011

All ready to eat/ potentially hazardous foods have been date marked.
No violations at time of follow up inspection.
PIC- Christina

Jun 7, 2012

The owner was not available at the time and the facility was closed- It is scheduled to conduct a fully standard inspection by next week. Talk to Lawis Ruffin who was the son the owner....and dscussed the nature of the complaint, he was very cooerative and promised to do something about it.

Aug 10, 2012

PIC: Sade
Updated green sign.

Sep 19, 2012

Talking to the manager and the owner of the facility it has been found that the complainant was an employee who has been fired from the job.
At the time we arrive to conduct for inspection we noticed that there was a cleaning process going on in the facility, sanitizing the floors, empting the coolers and freezer from all the food residues.
During the inspection no bugs,flies,flood or roof leaks were found in any room of the facility.
All the restrooms were clean and have posted all the requirement signs.
No furher action is requred.

Oct 26, 2012

PIC: Asia Garrett

Nov 15, 2012

PIC - Asia
- The inspection was conducted with Kelli Dodd
- The inspection report was discussed with the person-in-charge.

Do you have any questions you'd like to ask about BREEZE CAFE? Post them here so others can see them and respond.

×
BREEZE CAFE respresentatives - respond and add information

Write your review!

Your Ratings

You can rate this restaurant in different categories from 1 star (worst) to 5 stars (best) or leave category unrated

Food:
Service:
Price:
Ambience:
Cleanliness:

Your Review


Would you recommend BREEZE CAFE to others? (optional)
  
Add photo of BREEZE CAFE (optional)
Add more info about the restaurant »

About You

Your nickname:

Optional Verification

(additional info to increase the weight and the placement of your review and ratings)

Real Name:
Email (won't be published):
Date and time of your visit to this restaurant:
Phone number (won't be published):
Leave your signature»

Recently added reviews

Name City Users' Rating
PEKING DYNASTYColumbus, OH
***•
SUBWAY #11301Columbus, OH
*•
MCDONALD'S #6037-0340221Columbus, OH
*
COLUMBUS ARTS & TECHNOLOGY ACADEMYColumbus, OH
***
MCDONALD'S #17738Columbus, OH
SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSEColumbus, OH
94TH AERO SQUADRONColumbus, OH
*
STAR BOX LEARNING CENTERColumbus, OH
NEW HARVEST CAFE'Columbus, OH
*****
JAY'S SPORTS LOUNGEColumbus, OH
*

Restaurants in neighborhood

Name

Address

Distance

TACO BELL OF DUBLIN 2225 E Dublin-granville Rd, Columbus 0.05 miles
DUBLIN 2210 CORP 2210 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus 0.06 miles
WAISS LEARNING CENTER 2200 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus 0.07 miles
BORGATA PIZZA 5701 Parkville Rd, Columbus 0.08 miles
MARIACHI'S RESTAURANT 5701 Maple Canyon Av, Columbus 0.10 miles
FRIENDLY'S 2345 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus 0.12 miles
MCDONALD'S 2091 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus 0.14 miles
HUNAN HOUSE 2350 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus 0.15 miles
WENDYS #600198 2061 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus 0.17 miles
LACABANA LOUNGE 2400 E Dublin Granville Rd, Columbus 0.21 miles

Create your own business profile on city-data.com. It's completely free!
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: