Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-08-2018, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,110,503 times
Reputation: 21239

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
That's a good one. And there is a video, too....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcliR8kAbzc
Appropriate, "The Duchess" was indeed a Brit, but a more formidable looking one than the actress in the video. Think Maggie Smith on steroids. She had a huge head, which made it so much fun to decapitate her night after night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-08-2018, 01:56 PM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,087 posts, read 20,697,383 times
Reputation: 5928
Brit, hey? I have a theory... ..that if 90% of the people of a country tend to be a particular way, 10% of the ones Not like that are REALLY not like that.

As an Example, the generality of women around here hear are painful to look at, but the 10% who aren't are beauty -contest -winners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2018, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,110,503 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
Brit, hey? I have a theory... ..that if 90% of the people of a country tend to be a particular way, 10% of the ones Not like that are REALLY not like that.

As an Example, the generality of women around here hear are painful to look at, but the 10% who aren't are beauty -contest -winners.
What happened to you guys? Back in the '60's and '70's the UK seemed to have an inexhaustible supply of gorgeous actresses..Suzy Kendall, Susan George, Julie Christie, Jenny Agutter, Charlotte Rampling, Judy Geeson...all frequent guests in my adolescent fantasies.

But then came square jawed Glenda Jackson and ever since it seems you Brits have been deliberately selecting chubby, thick legged, frumpy or severe looking leading ladies. Compare the Dr. Who companions of the Pertwee/Baker era to the dregs that now populate the series...shameful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2018, 02:43 PM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,087 posts, read 20,697,383 times
Reputation: 5928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
What happened to you guys? Back in the '60's and '70's the UK seemed to have an inexhaustible supply of gorgeous actresses..Suzy Kendall, Susan George, Julie Christie, Jenny Agutter, Charlotte Rampling, Judy Geeson...all frequent guests in my adolescent fantasies.

But then came square jawed Glenda Jackson and ever since it seems you Brits have been deliberately selecting chubby, thick legged, frumpy or severe looking leading ladies. Compare the Dr. Who companions of the Pertwee/Baker era to the dregs that now populate the series...shameful.
Mention of Dr. Who reminds me of a vid i watched (1) complaining about the PC policy of the BBC. Personally I though a female Dr Who was a great idea and as she says "High Time". Though the projected story line of her going back and intervening in various social wrongs of the past might be a bit Groanworthy. But it may be that Policy now eschews screenladies you could eat even without cream on and lantern Jawed lasses or wimmin whose value is in everything but looks is what's wanted.

I might see if I can find a link, and I don't really agree with the fellow, any more than I agree with the other vid that said that Startrek had been ruined by Liberal policymakers behind it. The ruin is through people who make Fiims but care nothing about the ethos of the story.

It's rather like the Conan stories. The later stories were good because they had the utmost respect for the original series and its' word. Had they not, they might have been good stories, but they wouldn't have been Good Conan.

(1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jr6DMssVMVM

Have patience with this So Cool pair of young snipperyappers, because the vid is good when it gets going, and they make the point that is Seems to respect the Dr Who canon...but we shall see.

Last edited by TRANSPONDER; 11-08-2018 at 02:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2018, 10:30 PM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
16,155 posts, read 12,853,575 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
What happened to you guys? Back in the '60's and '70's the UK seemed to have an inexhaustible supply of gorgeous actresses..Suzy Kendall, Susan George, Julie Christie, Jenny Agutter, Charlotte Rampling, Judy Geeson...all frequent guests in my adolescent fantasies.

But then came square jawed Glenda Jackson and ever since it seems you Brits have been deliberately selecting chubby, thick legged, frumpy or severe looking leading ladies. Compare the Dr. Who companions of the Pertwee/Baker era to the dregs that now populate the series...shameful.
I blame Brexit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2018, 10:50 PM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,087 posts, read 20,697,383 times
Reputation: 5928
When you have freaks like Farrago and Gove the git, not to mention Boris the bear, why should women make an effort?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2018, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Somewhere out there.
10,529 posts, read 6,160,089 times
Reputation: 6569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
What happened to you guys? Back in the '60's and '70's the UK seemed to have an inexhaustible supply of gorgeous actresses..Suzy Kendall, Susan George, Julie Christie, Jenny Agutter, Charlotte Rampling, Judy Geeson...all frequent guests in my adolescent fantasies.

But then came square jawed Glenda Jackson and ever since it seems you Brits have been deliberately selecting chubby, thick legged, frumpy or severe looking leading ladies. Compare the Dr. Who companions of the Pertwee/Baker era to the dregs that now populate the series...shameful.

Huh? What do you mean Grandstander? Could it be that you're just beyond adolescent fantasies? I'm no expert here being a heterosexual female but I recognize a beautiful face when I see one.
What about Emily Blunt? I'm absolutely mesmerized by her - I just think she's stunning. What about Kate Winslet? Rachel Weisz? Catherine Zeta Jones?
And Dr Who? I thought everyone fancied Billy Piper?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2018, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Somewhere out there.
10,529 posts, read 6,160,089 times
Reputation: 6569
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
When you have freaks like Farrago and Gove the git, not to mention Boris the bear, why should women make an effort?
Also have Colin Firth though who more than makes up for what's lacking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2018, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,110,503 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruithne View Post
Huh? What do you mean Grandstander? Could it be that you're just beyond adolescent fantasies? I'm no expert here being a heterosexual female but I recognize a beautiful face when I see one.
What about Emily Blunt? I'm absolutely mesmerized by her - I just think she's stunning. What about Kate Winslet? Rachel Weisz? Catherine Zeta Jones?
And Dr Who? I thought everyone fancied Billy Piper?
The group you list above isn't in the same room with the actresses I listed. It is probably more a matter of type preference than aging. My group were all slender, yours features some big bottoms and less than slim figures. Big, collagen inflated lips are all the rage these days, but they are a turn off for me. I have a friend who once made the observation that when women are judging other women, they always overrate the "striking" types which isn't the same thing as being attractive. Anne Bancroft was striking, Angelina Jolie is striking, but neither appeal much to me.

You do have a point with the "beyond the adolescent fantasies." Even the celebrity women of today whom I consider very attractive, are not as attractive to me as were the celebrity women of my youth. I think it is like with music or movies, your basic tastes are formed between the ages of 13-25 and change very little after that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2018, 01:41 PM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,087 posts, read 20,697,383 times
Reputation: 5928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruithne View Post
Also have Colin Firth though who more than makes up for what's lacking.
I'll have to loom him up as for some reason I don't keep a close eye on male screen hunks I trust he's not another of those young male models in designer stubble whom wimmin swoon over before they find out he's gay?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top