Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Basketball
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2010, 05:57 PM
FBJ
 
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,605 posts, read 59,003,482 times
Reputation: 9451

Advertisements

Wilt and Russell played in a era when there was no compeition

Example is below

1. Wilt scoring 100 pts
2. Russell winning 9 titles


Never would happen today which means Hakeem is the greatest center of all time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-01-2010, 11:56 PM
 
542 posts, read 1,449,327 times
Reputation: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
Wilt and Russell played in a era when there was no compeition

Example is below

1. Wilt scoring 100 pts
2. Russell winning 9 titles


Never would happen today which means Hakeem is the greatest center of all time

shaq is certainly better than hakeem. kareem as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2010, 01:25 AM
 
10,719 posts, read 20,293,313 times
Reputation: 10021
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
Wilt and Russell played in a era when there was no compeition

Example is below

1. Wilt scoring 100 pts
2. Russell winning 9 titles


Never would happen today which means Hakeem is the greatest center of all time
The problem with that argument is you can't name another guy who scored a 100 pts back then. Regardless of the time, Wilt's stats were ridiculous. He was a 7fter that ran tack and field at Kansas. He was the greatest combination of size, power, SPEED and athleticism to ever play the game. They had to create rules based on Wilt because he was so dominant. Even today, Wilt would be dominant because unlike most centers today, he had agility and speed and wasn't just a stiff or a glorified offensive lineman that mauled people (Shaq). And Hakeem only won 2 rings because Jordan took a 2 year hiatus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2010, 05:34 PM
 
Location: Brushy Creek
806 posts, read 2,884,007 times
Reputation: 556
Quote:
shaq is certainly better than hakeem. kareem as well.
Based on what evidence? Hakeem knocked out Kareem's Lakers ('86) in the western conference finals and Shaq's Magic ('95) in the title game.

Quote:
And Hakeem only won 2 rings because Jordan took a 2 year hiatus.
And Shaq only won his after he retired...

The arguments can be based on the players' head to head competitions, but to suggest that the era and competition unfairly favored any of them is ridiculous. Maybe their parents should have held off on having them until the 'competition' would have been more 'suitable' for your comparisons?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2010, 06:02 PM
FBJ
 
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,605 posts, read 59,003,482 times
Reputation: 9451
Quote:
Originally Posted by renter8319 View Post
shaq is certainly better than hakeem. kareem as well.

Guess you forgot that Shaq coud not do anything to stop Hakeem in 95 Finals
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2010, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Cook County
5,289 posts, read 7,486,920 times
Reputation: 3105
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
Guess you forgot that Shaq coud not do anything to stop Hakeem in 95 Finals
Gerald Wallace has owned LBJ in the 09-10 regular season head to head, he MUST be better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2010, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Cook County
5,289 posts, read 7,486,920 times
Reputation: 3105
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVandSportsGuy View Post
Wilt and Russell played in a era when there was no compeition

Example is below

1. Wilt scoring 100 pts
2. Russell winning 9 titles


Never would happen today which means Hakeem is the greatest center of all time
If Wilt had no competition why doesn't he have more rings?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2010, 06:17 PM
FBJ
 
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,605 posts, read 59,003,482 times
Reputation: 9451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeish View Post
Gerald Wallace has owned LBJ in the 09-10 regular season head to head, he MUST be better.
Shaq said himself he was never on Hakeem' level and that Hakeem is greatest center of all time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2010, 06:19 PM
FBJ
 
Location: Tall Building down by the river
39,605 posts, read 59,003,482 times
Reputation: 9451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeish View Post
If Wilt had no competition why doesn't he have more rings?
Because he is overrated and scored a 100 pts on players who were under 6 feet
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2010, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Brushy Creek
806 posts, read 2,884,007 times
Reputation: 556
Now it's the height advantage? Manute Bol, Gheorge Muresan, Shawn Bradley...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Basketball

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top