Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2020, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,307,990 times
Reputation: 34059

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finper View Post
And that’s just what’s reported. Most people don’t report crimes like stolen bikes or car break ins because cops don’t do anything .....it’s a waste of time
Right...lol as if cops ever launched an investigation for a stolen bike or a car break in. People file reports for very minor crimes like those usually because they need it for an insurance claim and it's been that way for the last 30 or 40 years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2020, 05:22 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,741 posts, read 16,369,041 times
Reputation: 19836
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCalMan View Post
Let's hear it. And don't quote the Cato Institute or any organization that uses Cato Institute statistics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
I don't think you get to pick sources another person uses, or is that now part of the terms of service?
Been out hiking. Have to get back to this later. But quick laugh: the Cato Institute is a right-leaning Libertarian organization - which ideology typically runs anti-illegal immigration bias and hard right on crime. Very interesting that right-wing identifying NorCalMan doesn’t want data from his own ideological cousins .

But no problem. There are various sources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 05:22 PM
 
590 posts, read 932,485 times
Reputation: 1314
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
I don't think you get to pick sources another person uses, or is that now part of the terms of service?
Because the Cato Institute findings on illegal alien crime rates have been debunked, yet news sources like CNN and the NYT site it's findings in their news because it fits their agenda, and then people like you who don't care to learn the truth on their own believe fake news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 05:25 PM
 
590 posts, read 932,485 times
Reputation: 1314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
Been out hiking. Have to get back to this later. But quick laugh: the Cato Institute is a right-leaning Libertarian organization - which ideology typically runs anti-illegal immigration bias and hard right on crime. Very interesting that right-wing identifying NorCalMan doesn’t want data from his own ideological cousins .

But no problem. There are various sources.
So quick to make assumptions. Par for the course for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 05:51 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,307,990 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by augiedogie View Post
I dont think Ca. crime would be more under reported than La. But it might be underreported more than a low crime state like Iowa. My point is that the crime in general is worse than the statistics would show in comparison to most other states.

Yes, the theft is not a violent crime. But the new law that decriminalizes thefts under 1000 dollars encourages crimonals and will probably attract more criminals to the state. Criminals tend to commit all kinds of crimes and so violent crimes will increase also.
OMG a felony threshold of $950 attracts criminals to California? If that were true then you would think all the crooks would move to Texas where the threshold for felony theft is $2500, dontcha think?

And no, non-violent criminals do not all go on to commit violent crimes, I don't need statistics to prove that just ask a local cop. But if they did, so what? Would you advocate that we execute shoplifters because they might go on to commit a violent crime?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,307,990 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCalMan View Post
Because the Cato Institute findings on illegal alien crime rates have been debunked, yet news sources like CNN and the NYT site it's findings in their news because it fits their agenda, and then people like you who don't care to learn the truth on their own believe fake news.
Actually CATO has debunked the garbage regarding the cost of immigrants coming out of FAIR and Numbers USA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 05:59 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,307,990 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by veritased View Post
Kevroqs: 1, Tulemutt 0.
I didn't expect you to post on this thread given that Arizona came in 10th in the same study https://247wallst.com/special-report...-america-5/10/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 06:09 PM
 
590 posts, read 932,485 times
Reputation: 1314
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Some of those sources were behind paywalls, but I saw none that that had 2018 data which is what we should be discussing. You can't complain about prop 47 and then use 2014 data to make your case because prop 47 didn't become effective until November 2018. What you should be looking at is 2018 data which is the latest that we have data for, then use prior years as a comparison. Here are some highlights of a report in the Sac Bee analyzing 2018 crime data.



You can dislike prop 47 but you are going to have a tough time making it out to be a failure. For one thing it reduced the prison population which was mandated by SCOTUS. The feds had warned the state that if they didn't reduce the prison population on their own, they would do it for them, using any criteria they chose. And I'm guessing you probably missed this in your research, but after California passed prop 47 four other states reclassified drug possession to a misdemeanor; Alaska, Oklahoma, Utah and Connecticut and the sky has not yet fallen

Putting drug addicts in prison never 'fixed them', and while some District Attorney's claim they were using the threat of a felony to force people arrested for drug possession into treatment, they are for the most part lying. And how successful is treatment, whether coerced or voluntary? NA /AAA have about a 5-10% long term success rate, other programs don't fare much better.

You seem to think that long term incarceration in state prisons reduces crime, but it does just the opposite, everyone sent to prison comes out a felon meaning they are marked for life and will likely have trouble getting a job, renting an apartment or qualifying for low income housing, and to what effect? Because people like you can feel that society got it's "pound of flesh" from some addict who happened to have a little bit of dope in their pocket?

And last but not least, you seem very upset about the threshold for felony theft being raised from $400 to $950 in California. There are only 12 states with a threshold of $750 or less, the rest have felony thresholds far higher. In 2010 South Carolina raised their felony theft threshold from $1,000 to $2,000 and crime went down
I appreciate your response, despite some assumptions and generalizations you made regarding my positions and character. That said, while prop 47 only officially started in 2018, it was passed in 2014 based on public safety realignment in 2011, thus, while the crime statistics I sited might not all fall within the time frame of 2018 to present that you might prefer, crime statistics are crime statistics and can't be ignored.

Even though prop 47 is relatively new, prop 57 and AB 109 have existed longer and as a result once felonious crimes like domestic violence, solicitation to commit murder, human trafficking, and raping an unconscious individual have all been downgraded.

Voters were promised that Proposition 57 would only grant early release to ‘non-violent’ offenders, but the drafters of that initiative never defined which crimes were ‘non-violent.’ As prosecutors have pointed out, that loophole has meant sex traffickers, rapists, abusive spouses and even drive-by shooters have qualified for early release under the state’s "nonviolent" parole process. Do these crimes sound nonviolent to you?

As Prop. 57 paved the way for early release of hardened felons, AB109 amended more than 500 criminal statutes, reduced penalties for parole violations, and shifted thousands of convicted felons from state prison to county jails. Both have been exacerbated by Prop. 47, which makes it almost impossible to lock up serial offenders for drug and property crimes. So we can sit here all day and say crime is down, no it's up. But the truth is, crime has not gone down, it's gone up. "Serious crime" may have gone down but that's only because many of those crimes have been reclassified.

Both of us will have to wait a while longer to get a full picture on prop 47 and it's unintended outcomes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 06:11 PM
 
590 posts, read 932,485 times
Reputation: 1314
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Actually CATO has debunked the garbage regarding the cost of immigrants coming out of FAIR and Numbers USA
I'm not interested in quoting anything from those two organizations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 06:17 PM
 
Location: San Diego CA>Tijuana, BC>San Antonio, TX
6,508 posts, read 7,545,217 times
Reputation: 6878
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
I didn't expect you to post on this thread given that Arizona came in 10th in the same study https://247wallst.com/special-report...-america-5/10/
But their is a perfectly logical explanation for that....

Our other neighbor, Nevada also makes the top 10.

Top states for rape (classified as a violent crime) are Louisiana followed by Alaska.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top