Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-08-2008, 09:07 AM
 
1,490 posts, read 2,252,951 times
Reputation: 288

Advertisements

I teach high school English, and the first time I came across these terms was a few weeks ago when I was in the computer lab with my students while they were doing some research. They kept asking me, "What does THIS term mean?!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-08-2008, 09:08 AM
 
2,957 posts, read 7,386,627 times
Reputation: 1958
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiek View Post
Call it what you wish, the fact is that B.C. and A.D. or B.C.E and C.E all boil down to the period before and after Christ.

Hope this makes the atheists feel better.
Unlike "Before Christ", BCE does not define a Christ or even acknowledge one. Rather, it acknowledges the appearance of Christians. And, yes, that does make me feel better.

It's literally funny to me that Christians feel "attacked" by this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2008, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Just a few miles outside of St. Louis
1,921 posts, read 5,623,586 times
Reputation: 1251
Quote:
Originally Posted by via chicago View Post
BCE and CE have been used for centuries...they're hardly anything "new"
Can you give us some examples? I'd be curious, because until the last few years, all I'd ever heard was the B.C., and A.D., including history books, etc. It doesn't particularly bother me, as such, 'though I do find it odd. When I come across the newer terms, (at least for me), I just wind up translating it into the old terms anyway, (i.e. before Christ and after Christ, which merely gives me a timeframe to work with), so I'm not sure what the point is. I just wish "someone" would make up their minds as to which terms to use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2008, 09:13 AM
 
2,329 posts, read 6,637,756 times
Reputation: 1812
Quote:
Originally Posted by CelticLady1 View Post
Can you give us some examples? I'd be curious, because until the last few years, all I'd ever heard was the B.C., and A.D., including history books, etc. It doesn't particularly bother me, as such, 'though I do find it odd. When I come across the newer terms, (at least for me), I just wind up translating it into the old terms anyway, (i.e. before Christ and after Christ, which merely gives me a timeframe to work with), so I'm not sure what the point is. I just wish "someone" would make up their minds as to which terms to use.
from Wikipedia
Quote:
Origins of usage of Common Era terminology The term "Common Era" is traced back in English to its appearance as "Vulgar Era" (from the Latin word vulgus, the common people, i.e. those who are not royalty) at a time when vulgar did not mean "crudely indecent". The first use of the Latin equivalent (vulgaris aerae) discovered so far was in a 1617 table of ephemerides.[7] A 1635 English edition of that book has the title page in English - so far, the earliest-found usage of Vulgar Era in English.[19] (A 1652 ephemeris is the first instance so far found for English usage of "Christian Era".[20]) A 1701 book edited by John LeClerc includes "Before Christ according to the Vulgar Æra, 6".[21] A 1716 book in English by Dean Humphrey Prideaux says, "before the beginning of the vulgar æra, by which we now compute the years from his incarnation."[22][23] A 1796 book uses the term "vulgar era of the nativity". [24]
The phrase "common era" appears at least as early as 1715 in a book on astronomy.[25] Common era and vulgar era are used as synonyms in 1770, in a translation of a book originally written in German.[26] The 1797 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica uses the terms vulgar era and common era synonymously.[27] In 1835, in his book Living Oracles, Alexander Campbell, wrote: "The vulgar Era, or Anno Domini; the fourth year of Jesus Christ, the first of which was but eight days",[28] and also refers to the common era as a synonym for vulgar era with "the fact that our Lord was born on the 4th year before the vulgar era, called Anno Domini, thus making (for example) the 42d year from his birth to correspond with the 38th of the common era..."[29] The Catholic Encyclopedia uses the sentence: "Foremost among these [various eras] is that which is now adopted by all civilized peoples and known as the Christian, Vulgar or Common Era, in the twentieth century of which we are now living."[18] During the 19th century, "Vulgar Era" came to be contrasted with "Christian Era", and "vulgar" came to mean "crudely indecent", thus no longer a synonym for "common".
The phrase "common era", in lower case, also appeared in the 19th century in a generic sense, not necessarily to refer to the Christian Era, but to any system of dates in common use throughout a civilization. Thus, "the common era of the Jews",[30][31] "the common era of the Mahometans",[32] "common era of the world", [33] "the common era of the foundation of Rome".[34] When it did refer to the Christian Era, it was sometimes qualified, e.g., "common era of the Incarnation",[35] "common era of the Nativity",[36] or "common era of the birth of Christ".[37]
Some Jewish academics were already using the CE and BCE abbreviations by the mid-19th century, such as in 1856, when Rabbi and historian, Morris Jacob Raphall used the abbreviation in his book, Post-Biblical History of The Jews.[38]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2008, 09:18 AM
 
4,440 posts, read 9,073,068 times
Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by b. frank View Post

It's literally funny to me that Christians feel "attacked" by this.
funny and sad.. ditto again to b.frank
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2008, 09:20 AM
 
4,440 posts, read 9,073,068 times
Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by CelticLady1 View Post
Can you give us some examples? I'd be curious, because until the last few years, all I'd ever heard was the B.C., and A.D., including history books, etc. It doesn't particularly bother me, as such, 'though I do find it odd. When I come across the newer terms, (at least for me), I just wind up translating it into the old terms anyway, (i.e. before Christ and after Christ, which merely gives me a timeframe to work with), so I'm not sure what the point is. I just wish "someone" would make up their minds as to which terms to use.
Common Era - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The term "Common Era" is traced back in English to its appearance as "Vulgar Era" (from the Latin word vulgus, the common people, i.e. those who are not royalty) at a time when vulgar did not mean "crudely indecent". The first use of the Latin equivalent (vulgaris aerae) discovered so far was in a 1617 table of ephemerides"

Its obvious to me that the left wing media started this back in the 1600's in preparation for the 2008 election by running shows on the Food network via subliminal placement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2008, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Oz
2,238 posts, read 9,759,196 times
Reputation: 1398
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiek View Post
Call it what you wish, the fact is that B.C. and A.D. or B.C.E and C.E all boil down to the period before and after Christ.

Hope this makes the atheists feel better.
I'm an atheist. Why should I care what it's called? Call it purple monkeys for all I care, it's still just a way of marking the date.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2008, 09:28 AM
 
Location: ARK-KIN-SAW
3,434 posts, read 9,747,499 times
Reputation: 1596
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoaminRed View Post
I'm an atheist. Why should I care what it's called? Call it purple monkeys for all I care, it's still just a way of marking the date.
Im a Christian but I agree with RoaminRed.

Whenever Christians are persecuted thruout history, Christian numbers have grown..just a thought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2008, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Just a few miles outside of St. Louis
1,921 posts, read 5,623,586 times
Reputation: 1251
Thank you, Via Chicago and BigThirsty! I didn't know that these seemingly new terms have actually been around so long. I've learned something new, today. Which is cool, because I believe in always trying to learn something new, every day, if possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2008, 12:31 PM
 
Location: San Antonio-Westover Hills
6,884 posts, read 20,414,488 times
Reputation: 5176
Quote:
Originally Posted by b. frank View Post
Unlike "Before Christ", BCE does not define a Christ or even acknowledge one. Rather, it acknowledges the appearance of Christians. And, yes, that does make me feel better.

It's literally funny to me that Christians feel "attacked" by this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigthirsty View Post
funny and sad.. ditto again to b.frank

Well, good. I'm glad you're getting a good laugh out of it. Some of us don't think it's that funny. Attacked? YES! Every single day I feel attacked for just being a Christian. Why shouldn't I, when things are removed from my life without so much as a "kiss my butt" from some studio jerk driving his 500SL all over Malibu with a Bluetooth strapped to his ear, hoping that more people will watch a show or see a movie or buy a book as a result--all signs of the dollar and no signs of anything else. Yes sir, I am attacked, and on all sides, with everything I do and everything I am. Just saying I am a Christian here, in these forums, yields an entirely new type of attack, an anonymous one, with stones hurled at glass houses by people who simply don't care because they don't have to.

So, please, feel free to yuk it up all you want. Obviously, it shows how stupid we all are and how smart you must be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top