Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
now that is oversimplified at best... yet I have never seen a jew simplify any of their own works.. no they expand on the expansions... .. just christians views of Hebrew had to corrected with oversimplifications right? Richard .
but yes that would be true-ish ( though extremely over simplified ) .. but he was a poor man ( I said was ) who did do both little and big miracles and he is right here ! ..
so that works too!
But still if I drop that into the ancient ways and ancient paths ..
well natives will get it.
now that is oversimplified at best... yet I have never seen a jew simplify any of their own works.. no they expand on the expansions... .. just christians views of Hebrew had to corrected with oversimplifications right? Richard .
but yes that would be true-ish ( though extremely over simplified ) .. but he was a poor man ( I said was ) who did do both little and big miracles and he is right here ! ..
so that works too!
But still if I drop that into the ancient ways and ancient paths ..
well natives will get it.
First thanks for the response,
No, not me, because I would know that he is false. because the true God made the man and the elephant.
so that would not work for me, maybe on some one else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by n..Xuipa
neither can he lay hands on LIFE... a rock cut with mans hands is Not God and can give instruction or can heal or raise itself from the dead, it can not create life or sustain it .. because it is dead and can never live.. ..
this hindu lacks basic knowledge of even the definition of life.. much less will he never understand an author of that 'life' he can't even fathom if he can call a rock God without cracking up...
Exactly !!
And the Hindu person will counter with the same sentiments. According to his faith, he would not consider Jesus as God no matter how you try to convince him. He will consider you, lacking the basic knowledge of theology, just as you think he lacks basic theology.
So it comes back to my original post. We do NOT have a universal frame of reference where EVERYONE agrees as to what and who God is?
And since we don't have that frame of reference, we can't use any proof or evidence of God.
You can't define and agree on what something is, how can you prove it's existence?
You can prove the existence of Jesus, and the Hindu person will agree with it, but when you say, Jesus is God, then it goes down the hill from there.
But yes indeed, there is no problem when someone claims that Jesus is the God in Christian faith. There is no argument in that.
Faith without evidence is dead faith...So says the book of James...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
