Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will LA remian the Capital west of the Mississippi
Yes 38 57.58%
No 28 42.42%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:13 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,357,090 times
Reputation: 21212

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost of Blasphamany View Post
You really take your post over the top with your political agenda, get over it kid. Let me ask you has a Republican ever touched you or of the sort or is it just crazed media that you always bring politics into everything?
Listen kid, you havent gotten the 411 about the real world yet, but start working and youll know not everyone gives a flying f about your city like how you want them to. As for Texas's relevancy, seriously? You obviously dont know a thing about Texas's economic industries. California is in a league of its own, I agree but basing things off politics to decide whether a place is relevant or not is dumb.

Its also funny that a person from Los Angeles is lecturing about educated when it is of the least educated metros in the country, California has high educated metros but Los Angeles isnt one of them, its just another normal metro.
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA CSA - Selected Social Characteristics in the United States: 2008
Los Angeles; Bachelor degree 27.5%, Highschool degree 77.3%
Dallas; highschool degree 81.3%, bachelor degree 28.9%.
Houston; highschool degree 28.0%, bachelor degree 80.1%

This thread isnt even for Texas but knowing you and your liberal conscience you sure know how to make it apart of the conversation, grow up kid. Experience life before you come here talking like youre a political sage.
Also throw in that neither Dallas nor Houston are particularly strong Republican strongholds. Neither Dallas nor Houston represent all of Texas, and whatever one perceives of Texas as a whole doesn't necessarily hold for all of Texas (because Texas is pretty goddamn big).

 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:17 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,384,032 times
Reputation: 1802
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Also throw in that neither Dallas nor Houston are particularly strong Republican strongholds. Neither Dallas nor Houston represent all of Texas, and whatever one perceives of Texas as a whole doesn't necessarily hold for all of Texas (because Texas is pretty goddamn big).
Texas is a Red\ Republican state; there is no way to water down reality.
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:19 PM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,169 posts, read 13,239,989 times
Reputation: 10141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost of Blasphamany View Post
You really take your post over the top with your political agenda, get over it kid. Let me ask you has a Republican ever touched you or of the sort or is it just crazed media that you always bring politics into everything?
Listen kid, you havent gotten the 411 about the real world yet, but start working and youll know not everyone gives a flying f about your city like how you want them to. As for Texas's relevancy, seriously? You obviously dont know a thing about Texas's economic industries. California is in a league of its own, I agree but basing things off politics to decide whether a place is relevant or not is dumb.

Its also funny that a person from Los Angeles is lecturing about educated when it is of the least educated metros in the country, California has high educated metros but Los Angeles isnt one of them, its just another normal metro.
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA CSA - Selected Social Characteristics in the United States: 2008
Los Angeles; .Highschool degree 77.3% Bachelor degree 27.5%
Dallas; .........Highschool degree 81.3%, Bachelor degree 28.9%.
Houston; , ....Highschool degree 80.1%, Bachelor degree 28.0%.

This thread isnt even for Texas but knowing you and your liberal conscience you sure know how to make it apart of the conversation, grow up kid. Experience life before you come here talking like youre a political sage.
Fixed the wording for you on the degree part, because Houston was backwards. I did not check whether the figures are accurate or not.
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:23 PM
 
301 posts, read 639,727 times
Reputation: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by LINative View Post
Fixed the wording for you on the degree part, because Houston was backwards. I did not check whether the figures are accurate or not.
Had link for LA already in post but here is for Houston Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX CSA - Selected Social Characteristics in the United States: 2008 and here is for Dallas http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet...mat=&-_lang=en
Frankly, whether a state is red or blue, does not affect tolerance. Acceptance is earned in all states and equally distributed, I have been accepted in CA and TX (am not minority) but have seen minorities do just fine. So start coming up with new theories for your political agenda kid.
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:24 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,357,090 times
Reputation: 21212
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
Texas is a Red\ Republican state; there is no way to water down reality.
Reality is not black or white (or red or blue). A state is huge, and we're talking about cities here. If you take a look at the fine print of most of these voting maps, you'll see that many blue states also have huge tracts that vote red (California included). There isn't a single state that consistently votes for one side with an overwhelming majority (the closest in the last presidential election was slightly less than 3 to 1 in Hawaii). Even California in the last presidential election went 8 to 5 for Obama. Texas had far closer results. Meanwhile, we have a Republican governor in CA.
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,514 posts, read 33,519,512 times
Reputation: 12147
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Do you really think Houston will pass LA in population, maybe if it annexes more land but it would need a denisty of like 6,800 ppsm. There are very few areas today that surpass that today in the 600 sq miles so it will require a ton of in fill to surpass LA.
Which is what Houston is currently doing.
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,384,032 times
Reputation: 1802
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Reality is neither black or white (or red or blue). A state is huge, and we're talking about cities here. If you take a look at the fine print of most of these voting maps, you'll see that many blue states also have huge tracts that vote red (California included). There isn't a single state that consistently votes for one side with an overwhelming majority (the closest in the last presidential election was slightly less than 3 to 1 in Hawaii). Even California in the last presidential election went 8 to 5 for Obama. Meanwhile, we have a Republican governor in CA.
To compare a Republican ala Schwarzenegger to a governor Perry of Texas is so distorted as to be unrecognizable. Any Republican who manages to gain statewide office in California would be considered a Democrat in states like Texas. Arnold would never be elected in Texas or any Southern state.
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:30 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,357,090 times
Reputation: 21212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Which is what Houston is currently doing.
Though the amount of infill we're talking about is pretty enormous.
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC (in my mind)
7,943 posts, read 17,247,259 times
Reputation: 4686
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
Anyone who suggests that Texas\ Houston will ever overtake Los Angeles as the capitol of the West is some sort of Republican puritan who believes the Bible-belt has any influence on the country beyond the South. Los Angeles is the absolute antipathy of Texas; liberal, tolerant, educated and relevant. How the largest city in Texas can replace the capitol of the West Coast is nothing more than a fantasy that will never come about in our life times.
LA is losing power, Houston is gaining. The facts prove it, deal with it kid.

40 years ago Detroit was in the top 4. Look at it now. LA is going the way of Detroit.
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,514 posts, read 33,519,512 times
Reputation: 12147
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Though the amount of infill we're talking about is pretty enormous.
Oh no doubt. It will take Houston to build a different type of density to increase its population at least in its core. It's starting to happen inside the loop though but I don't know if it's enough. Not to mention that highrise living isn't exactly popular in Houston yet.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top