Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-14-2017, 03:00 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,684 posts, read 9,406,200 times
Reputation: 7267

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by _OT View Post
Most of Birmingham's peers within the Sunbelt seem to start from the ground up, brand new, and implement a sense of developing projects that complies with "new urbanism." Those core areas seem to be a bit more suburban, wider streets, modern highrise/midrise, more sterile, cleaner. Birmingham embraces its gritty culture while also doing a good job of incorporating the newer development, with the old.

Most Sunbelt cities are prioritizing on building more and more within its' core, especially when it means increasing foot traffic. Well Birmingham already has that model in place, it's only job is refurbishing those buildings and putting business within these buildings, or in other cases making them mixed-use. While also infilling nearby vacant lots or parking spaces, with much more newer development (apartments).

Example: Turning an old run down Motel in Avondale, into something that'll increase foot activity, and shed growth withing that particular area as a whole.

One thing I also noticed is that Birmingham would rather develop within its neighborhoods instead of focusing on one particular task that'll only benefit one area in the long run; the frequent adjustments are being distributed within the Central, East, South, and Western parts of the city. Keep in mind that Birmingham is a legacy city, and from one of the articles I read a few months ago, some of the key elements for revitalization are...

Rebuilding the central core
Sustaining viable neighborhoods
Repurposing vacant land for new activities
Re-establishing the central economic role of the city
Using economic growth to increase community and resident well-being
Building stronger local governance and partnerships
Building stronger ties between legacy cities and their regions

Something you don't see being applied to other Sunbelt peers.
I see. I would argue that Memphis and Knoxville are following a similar model as Birmingham. And although Chattanooga may not be a peer, and Louisville and Richmond not in the sunbelt, those cities have also long taken advantage of the existing infrastructure rather building solely from the ground up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top