Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2010, 08:11 AM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,116,346 times
Reputation: 4794

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
lol, you don't believe me? Come see them, they are all huge.
Ive seem them many times, theyre in Dallas too....
All I saw in your pic was two freeways intersecting, with the largest being 5 lanes in ea direction. You mentioned 20? Are you just poking fun, or counting every lane in the picture?

Last edited by slo1318; 11-15-2010 at 08:38 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2010, 08:17 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
ugh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2010, 08:21 AM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,116,346 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by polo89 View Post
Houston only has 2 more 500+ skyscrapers then Miami. Both skylines are HUGE.

Both cities have large skylines. If you are talking CBD Houstons is taller, and thicker. Miami seems to have more buildings and is more linear. If you take metro than Miami wins, easily.....

This shot of Miami Beach up the coast is easily in view with DT Miami, this doesnt even catch the tip of South Beach which has multiple highrises. All the way up the coast, Sunny Isles, Ft Lauderdale has a nice skyline




Downtown Miami: sorry for the bad aerial

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2010, 08:39 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
908 posts, read 1,829,184 times
Reputation: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrlFlaUsa View Post
KORL the exec airport is the problem in Orlando not KMCO. Sucks but hey it is what it is, I'll take a great downtown over skyline anyday.
Is the castle at Disney the tallest building in Orlando?


Downtown Disney Area | Walt Disney World Resort
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2010, 10:30 AM
 
2,744 posts, read 6,110,118 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
he was the one who said SA had more, and he was adamant about it.
San Antonio at one time had the second highest amount of state highways after L.A. according to Txhywman website. Of course that was several years ago it might have lost that status. I've also heard sources say San Antonio had the second largest freeway system after L.A. in total freeway miles. San Antonio's total is around 3,200 miles of total freeway. It doesn't have the same traffic counts as Houston freeways but overall freeway size it is bigger.

Houston total freeway system 2,548
http://mobility.tamu.edu/mmp/FHWA-HOP-05-018/appendices/PDFs/houston.pdf (broken link)

San Antonio total freeway system 3,260
The San Antonio Area Freeway System
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2010, 10:49 AM
 
1,581 posts, read 2,824,761 times
Reputation: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweethomeSanAntonio View Post
San Antonio at one time had the second highest amount of state highways after L.A. according to Txhywman website. Of course that was several years ago it might have lost that status. I've also heard sources say San Antonio had the second largest freeway system after L.A. in total freeway miles. San Antonio's total is around 3,200 miles of total freeway. It doesn't have the same traffic counts as Houston freeways but overall freeway size it is bigger.

Houston total freeway system 2,548
http://mobility.tamu.edu/mmp/FHWA-HOP-05-018/appendices/PDFs/houston.pdf (broken link)

San Antonio total freeway system 3,260
The San Antonio Area Freeway System
Thats to bad the more freeways create a much more suburban city. With so much freeway it would be hard to create a urban city lanscape. Instead it creates sprawl and several skylines or vertical office parks if you want to call them that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2010, 10:52 AM
 
2,744 posts, read 6,110,118 times
Reputation: 977
True...but nothing will take away from Downtown S.A.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2010, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Austin,Tx
1,694 posts, read 3,622,115 times
Reputation: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
he was the one who said SA had more, and he was adamant about it.

410 is longer than 610 by the way 610 is 38 miles long while 410 is 49.49 miles long.

Interstate 410 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_610_(Texas)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2010, 12:19 PM
 
2,744 posts, read 6,110,118 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgrn198 View Post
410 is longer than 610 by the way 610 is 38 miles long while 410 is 49.49 miles long.

Interstate 410 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_610_(Texas)



Loop 1604 is 96 miles and beltway 8 is 83 miles. HTown swears it was bigger.

Texas State Highway Loop 1604 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Texas State Highway Beltway 8 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2010, 12:49 PM
rah
 
Location: Oakland
3,314 posts, read 9,236,154 times
Reputation: 2538
If you were to change the definition of "skyscraper" then these numbers would change too--sometimes drastically, depending on the city. For example, the SF MSA only has 18 building over 500 feet, but if we were to count 400 foot buildings as skyscrapers, than the SF MSA jumps up to 45. If we count all highrises from say, 200 feet upwards, than the SF MSA jumps to at least 189 (189 for SF and Oakland alone)...and if we count all buildings of about 100' and taller (Commercial Real Estate Information and Construction Data | Emporis.com seems to define a "high rise" as 100+ feet) within SF city limits alone, then you get a total of 418; more high rises than any US city aide from NYC, LA, Chicago, and Honolulu.

A list like this implies that city A, with 50 total high rises, 10 of which are 500'+ tall, is "taller" than city B, with 200 total high rises, of which only 4 are 500'+ tall. Doesn't really make sense except for arbitrary comparison of ultimately arbitrary and meaningless stuff...yeah i guess Dallas may have more "tallest" buildings than SF does, but SF undoubtedly has more tall buildings in total. Hell SF alone has more total high rises than Dallas and Fort Worth combined.

Last edited by rah; 11-15-2010 at 01:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top