Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will Houston surpass Chicago as the 3rd largest city by 2020?
Yes 497 41.49%
No 701 58.51%
Voters: 1198. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2010, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Austin/Houston
2,930 posts, read 5,272,017 times
Reputation: 2266

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SwisherSweet1 View Post
Idk if this has been said before but if it has not been, here it goes.

Chicago has about 3 million people living on only 227 square miles.

Houston has about 2.2 million people living on 601 square miles.

Pretty unfair, i'd say. So you got Chicago.....looks and feels like a big city and you got Houston which has alot of unpopulated land and feels like a suburb. Back to the question, will Houston pass Chicago in population by 2020? ........no, becuase people forget that Chicago is also growing.

Chicago Metro-10 million
Houston Metro-5.8 million
People always love to talk about Houston's 600 sq mi population but fail to realize inside those city limits are many lakes and parks. Lake Houston in Kingwood is very large. Do you think people live on the water? People also don't live on the parks. Houston's urbn area is only like 570 sq miles. The main difference is the City of Chicago doesn't count large lake of Michigan within their city limits. Part of it may run along the shores of Cook County but not in the actual city of Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-08-2010, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
I think the point is because area size is so inconsistent on city size that population comparisons sometimes are worthless. Is Boston as a city 1/5th the size of Houston? Well the population would suggest that but is covers a land area (city proper) 1/14th that of Houston.

Another example the urban area (UA) population of Houston is 4.4 Million versus the UA of Chicago at 8.5 million

Pheonix is larger in population than Philly, does that mean it is a bigger city?
who cares about your fancy divisions? the fact of the matter is phoenix has more people than philly and Houston will inevitably have more people. It means nothing. who the heck cares? It is my home and I love it the way it is
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2010, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by C2H (ComingtoHouston) View Post
People always love to talk about Houston's 600 sq mi population but fail to realize inside those city limits are many lakes and parks. Lake Houston in Kingwood is very large. Do you think people live on the water? People also don't live on the parks. The main difference is the City of Chicago doesn't count large lake of Michigan within their city limits. Part of it may run along the shores of Cook County but not in the actual city of Chicago.
Geoerge Bush Park, Memorial, cullen, and Hermann parks are some of the largest parks in the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2010, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Austin/Houston
2,930 posts, read 5,272,017 times
Reputation: 2266
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
Geoerge Bush Park, Memorial, cullen, and Hermann parks are some of the largest parks in the country.
exactly, and people (i.e. northeasterners) love to tout about Houston's 600 sq miles totally ignoring the fact that no one lives in many of those areas. Houston's true density is inside the loop
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2010, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by C2H (ComingtoHouston) View Post
exactly, and people (i.e. northeasterners) love to tout about Houston's 600 sq miles totally ignoring the fact that no one lives in many of those areas. Houston's true density is inside the loop
Best places to retire 2007: Most parks - MONEY Magazine

In terms of parks alone Houston has 56000 acres of parks

Chicago only has 11 000


and for those of you who are going to want to play with the numbers and say Houston has more land, in terms of percentage, Houston is 15% parks while Chicago is 8 %
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2010, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,215,611 times
Reputation: 7428
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
Best places to retire 2007: Most parks - MONEY Magazine

In terms of parks alone Houston has 56000 acres of parks

Chicago only has 11 000


and for those of you who are going to want to play with the numbers and say Houston has more land, in terms of percentage, Houston is 15% parks while Chicago is 8 %
And that's almost 90 sq. miles alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2010, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by jluke65780 View Post
And that's almost 90 sq. miles alone.
The space center alone accounts for another 2000 acres


Lake Livingston- 95000 acres
Lake Conroe is 21000 acres

Lake Houston 12000 acres

Sheldon Lake 1230 acres
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2010, 12:46 PM
 
765 posts, read 1,861,001 times
Reputation: 504
Come on guys, who cares if Houston will surprass Chicago as the nation's third largest city? Phoenix has already surprassed Philly in population, yet nothing has changed. Philly is still considered "bigger" since its metro is still significantly larger.

The question is when will Houston's MSA surprass Chicago's MSA? That is what matters more.

Houston has 5.8-5.9 million in its MSA, Chicago has 9.6 million. That's a really big margin...so who knows
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2010, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
571 posts, read 1,282,096 times
Reputation: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by C2H (ComingtoHouston) View Post
I agree with pretty much all of Omshahi's points. I think Houston better start thinking more like Dallas and investing in aesthetic landmarks in its downtown area before even trying to compete with a big boy like Chicago. That is one thing that Dallas beats the hell out of Houston on. If you're driving through each of the cities, especially at night, Dallas appears to be the more hype city but come to find out that everything that glitters ain't gold. Not a shot at Dallas but just saying that it may look more hype, but that doesn't necessarily mean it is, but at least it knows how to "act" like it is.
Yall should refer to my post in the Houston page about The Power of Houston festival.

I 100% agree w/ the whole thread about establishing a place. That said, I, personally, feel like part of doing that is establishing an identity. I feel like Houston's physical "face", so to speak, is pretty much non-existant.

New York = empire state building, brooklyn bridge, statue of liberty

Los Angeles = hollywood sign

Chicago = Sears Tower (or is it the Willis Tower now?)

San Francisco = TransAmerica Pyramid Tower, Golden Gate Bridge

Houston = ???. We have unique buildings and what not but I just feel like part of our problem is we don't have a concrete physical identity/face that EVERYONE (not just Houstonians or Texans) think of when they think of Houston. MAYBE the Williams Tower...maybe. I think part of it has to do w/ the fact that Houston's new found size is...well...new. Metro Chicago, San Fran, NY and LA have been the size they are for a LONG time now and in that time they've had things built and established...stuff to make them destinations...places people want to visit. Houston is trying to do that but this has always been a working town. People come here to work. I think, even for Houston leadership, thinking of making Houston into a "destination" is a new concept but you can tell they're trying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2010, 01:08 PM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,955,543 times
Reputation: 3545
But only Lake Houston is in Houston city limits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top