Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which would you live in if you HAD to choose.
East St Louis 25 20.33%
Camden 98 79.67%
Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2014, 08:45 PM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,407,718 times
Reputation: 5368

Advertisements

Neither. They both suck regardless of location.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2014, 10:40 PM
 
96 posts, read 245,567 times
Reputation: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maintainschaos View Post
Neither. They both suck regardless of location.
I think the argument is that Camden would suck less because of its given location. At least with Camden you've got NYC, Philly, etc. only a couple of hours away, and will have a better opportunity to move elsewhere better if given the chance.

With East St. Louis, you've got STL from one end and nothing but farmland the other direction (that and Chi, KC and Memphis are more like day trips). But yeah, hell naw to both...Either you can live in a dilapidated project or row home with the odds of being a victim increased 20 fold, or end up being stranded in some random country ghetto. pick your poison. I don't think either choice is a real winner.

If you're gonna go out like that, might as well do it in the more vibrant and seemingly bustling city...East St. Louis would depress the hell out of me after a couple of days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2014, 12:11 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,201,963 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadro77 View Post
Camden does seem more lively looking at the pics (never been). One thing about ESTL is that if you drive through during the day, you don't really see anyone. Kinda eerie.

ESTL, Madison, Sauget etc. are all crappy. I'm not a huge fan of the metro east minus a few cities.
Actually the one thing I found weird about Camden was how empty its downtown seemed even during afternoon rush hour when you'd think it would be teeming with people leaving work and heading home. You expect to see few people in places where the infrastructure has crumbled into disrepair, but to see so few people in this intact-looking downtown just didn't compute. I remember thinking what a waste of resources to have a rather new looking (at the time anyway) light rail station that was almost completely unused at rush hour.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2014, 03:36 AM
 
Location: Paris
1,773 posts, read 2,676,743 times
Reputation: 1109
Quote:
Originally Posted by VIBЄ View Post
I think the argument is that Camden would suck less because of its given location. At least with Camden you've got NYC, Philly, etc. only a couple of hours away, and will have a better opportunity to move elsewhere better if given the chance.

With East St. Louis, you've got STL from one end and nothing but farmland the other direction (that and Chi, KC and Memphis are more like day trips). But yeah, hell naw to both...Either you can live in a dilapidated project or row home with the odds of being a victim increased 20 fold, or end up being stranded in some random country ghetto. pick your poison. I don't think either choice is a real winner.

If you're gonna go out like that, might as well do it in the more vibrant and seemingly bustling city...East St. Louis would depress the hell out of me after a couple of days.
Not true, there are actually about 700,000 people in the metro east, ESTL is just a tiny sliver. (not that I'm advocating for either ESTL or Camden)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2014, 04:13 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
2,752 posts, read 2,408,559 times
Reputation: 3155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
Actually the one thing I found weird about Camden was how empty its downtown seemed even during afternoon rush hour when you'd think it would be teeming with people leaving work and heading home. You expect to see few people in places where the infrastructure has crumbled into disrepair, but to see so few people in this intact-looking downtown just didn't compute. I remember thinking what a waste of resources to have a rather new looking (at the time anyway) light rail station that was almost completely unused at rush hour.
East St Louis' downtown is much worse and there are even less people there than in Camden's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2014, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,407,718 times
Reputation: 5368
Quote:
Originally Posted by VIBЄ View Post
I think the argument is that Camden would suck less because of its given location. At least with Camden you've got NYC, Philly, etc. only a couple of hours away, and will have a better opportunity to move elsewhere better if given the chance.

With East St. Louis, you've got STL from one end and nothing but farmland the other direction (that and Chi, KC and Memphis are more like day trips). But yeah, hell naw to both...Either you can live in a dilapidated project or row home with the odds of being a victim increased 20 fold, or end up being stranded in some random country ghetto. pick your poison. I don't think either choice is a real winner.

If you're gonna go out like that, might as well do it in the more vibrant and seemingly bustling city...East St. Louis would depress the hell out of me after a couple of days.
Yeah, I understand the location argument, I just don't think proximity to NYC (and even less to Philly) lends enough justification for ever wanting to or choosing to live in Camden. The people stuck in those project row homes aren't spending their weekends taking in cultural institutions in either city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2014, 09:31 AM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,527,199 times
Reputation: 9193
Luxury loft living in Camden--with a nice view of the Philly skyline.

Camden Apartments - Luxury Apartments in Camden, NJ - The Victor

I looked up the price--a good sized 1 bedroom apartment rents for about $1,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2014, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY $$$
6,836 posts, read 15,412,690 times
Reputation: 1668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
Luxury loft living in Camden--with a nice view of the Philly skyline.

Camden Apartments - Luxury Apartments in Camden, NJ - The Victor

I looked up the price--a good sized 1 bedroom apartment rents for about $1,000.
I love philly and have family down there. I'm also not afraid of east coast ghettos mainly because crimes tend to be more personal on these sides.

I would rent out this apartment in a heart beat. Parking is probably good in Camden so driving to philly wouldn't be an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2014, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY $$$
6,836 posts, read 15,412,690 times
Reputation: 1668
Also there is plenty of hope for Camden going on to the future. As long as gentrification in philly picks up it's pace (not a huge gentrification fan but it is what it is). As for east saint Louis the only option would be to increase the police force and have it go through redevelopment rather than gentrification. If the redevelopment is a success than we can talk gentrification.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2014, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,978,882 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
That was from a self-styled ESL "expert" who believes it's safer there than Oshkosh, WI. You can pretty much ignore him on this subject, if you haven't done so already.
I think I'm going to have to write him off as mentally deranged. I would have expected better from such a prolific poster.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
I've been in East St. Louis many times. Quite a bit of the city looks like any other suburb.
Really?

Here is what comes up when I search East St. Louis in Google.

https://www.google.com/search?q=east...%3B3264%3B2448

Here is what comes up when I search Carmel Indiana

https://www.google.com/search?q=east...=isch&imgdii=_

Here is what comes up when I search Franklin Tennessee.

https://www.google.com/search?biw=12...42.xJ__PPQLOBE

Here's what I see when I search Ridgeland Mississippi.

https://www.google.com/search?biw=12...82.F88wLUZuCM0

Do you now understand how East St. Louis is not like most suburbs? Gary Indiana is a suburb of Chicago, it looks nothing like Aurora Illinois another suburb of Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top