Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I TOTALLY AGREE THAT YOUR MAP OF DOWNTOWN CHICAGO IS WHAT THE CITY SHOULD DECARE... AS ITS FULL DOWNTOWN TODAY Your Map includes the Gold Coast to Lincoln Park.... As I said in previous pages. It should, and stretch it a bit further Down....to include the new skyscrapers that developed across from Solder Field.
Compare though YOUR map of Downtown Chicago? With The OFFICIAL CITY WEBSIGHT SHOWING DOWNTOWN BOUNDARIES.
These new residential skyscrapers �� and high-rises and New Townhouses on the left of picture. Currently are NOT OFFICIALY DOWNTOWN. IN YOUR MAP IT IS INCLUDED
IN THIS PICURE.... ALL THE BUILDINGS TO START OF LINCOLN PARK AT CENTER TOP PART OF PHOTO, ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR MAP. BUT NOT OFFICIALLY BY THE CITY IN ITS MAP OF OFFICIAL DOWNTOWN CHICAGO. BUILDINGS TO RIGHT OF LINCOLN PARK. STILL WOULD NOT BE INCLUDED? ��
Location: East Central Pennsylvania/ Chicago for 6yrs.
2,535 posts, read 3,281,063 times
Reputation: 1483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531
Steep's posts always seem hyperbolic.
If someone is hyperbolic, they tend to exaggerate things as being way bigger deals than they really are. Hyperbolic statements are tiny dogs with big barks: What you also are saying of my pictures is.....an excess, and it’s not necessary, which is exactly what being hyperbolic is all about: making statements bigger than necessary.
I simply used pictures to give extra enhancements and factual reasons for my viewpoint on the Topic. For the city being claimed to have been Bested. One could say to Topic is hyperbolic on how and what it is promoting. I gave points of why Chicago's borders could and should be expanded on what now is part of Downtown? As others even did for adding to Philly's.
The point of the threads topic is.... the Census using 1 Square from the Cities City Hall, and 1 additional mile buffer area also. I noted even with a picture. How Chicago is in a disadvantage. Even a city like NYC. Because a 1/3 then is Grant Park/Millennium Park, and Harbor of Lake Michigan.
pictures of areas defined as Downtown and areas it easily could and should also include? in my view and another posted a map of his saying the exact same area added as I.
You posted then THESE COMMENTS on another thread.......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531
Philly is the only city in America with a neighborhood I think to have close to a perfect walk, bike, and transit score according to walkscore.com. Pretty impressive.
I do agree Philly is more walkable than Chicago, but I don't find Philly to be an aesthetically pleasing city to walk. Walking along rowhouse after rowhouse would get boring and tedious. I like Chicago's neighborhoods like Lincoln Park a lot more. More interesting street scenes and architecture.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531
Most would agree Chicago has better architecture than Philly does. It's one of the top cities for it.
BUT THIS AT THE START, FIRST PAGE... IN THIS ONE⤵
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531
Chicago falling further and further behind in just every metric these days.
Congrats, Philly!
Chicago still has SIGNIFICANTLY larger and more numerous skyscrapers/high rise buildings.
So what? Chicago has SIGNIFICANTLY more high-rise buildings than Paris, but Paris is much denser and more pleasant to walk around. The Loop only looks good from the air. From the ground, where people actually live, it's just a monotonous maze of wind tunnels.
So what? Chicago has SIGNIFICANTLY more high-rise buildings than Paris, but Paris is much denser and more pleasant to walk around. The Loop only looks good from the air. From the ground, where people actually live, it's just a monotonous maze of wind tunnels.
Philly and Chicago are two of my favorite cities and favorite DTs, both are large in the US perspective, Chicago larger. Chicago is on a larger scale and Philly more intimate. I like both very much even if slightly different appeals. Both are very active and vibrant.
So what? Chicago has SIGNIFICANTLY more high-rise buildings than Paris, but Paris is much denser and more pleasant to walk around. The Loop only looks good from the air. From the ground, where people actually live, it's just a monotonous maze of wind tunnels.
Well, Paris and Chicago do have one thing in common. They are both better cities than Philadelphia.
I think few would dispute that Paris is a much more pleasant place to walk around than the Loop. The area around Market Street in Philadelphia is also not very pleasant. Same goes for Midtown and FiDi in New York.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.