Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: San Francisco becoming more Influential than Los Angeles?
San Franciso is Becoming more Influential Globally 72 37.89%
Los Angeles is Still more Influential Globally 118 62.11%
Voters: 190. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-25-2015, 06:09 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,657 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239

Advertisements

This article came out in the LA Times yesterday...it's titled: Why San Francisco's way of doing business beat Los Angeles'

It simply reiterates what Ive been saying. The Bay Area has taken over as the primary engine of economic growth in California. The Bay Area is the epicenter of the most dynamic industries in California while Los Angeles, once a worthy rival, has really declined over the past 40 years, unable to keep up with San Francisco. This is not hyperbole, it's statistical fact based on years of jobs data, gdp growth data, income growth data, financial markets data etc.

It's almost as if we are now comparing two different countries with different standards of living, at least that's what the LA Times says...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Los Angeles Times
Today, the five-county Los Angeles region is ranked 25th on the income scale, while the 10-county Bay Area region remains No. 1. Per capita, workers in the Bay Area make 30% more than those in greater Los Angeles. That's almost as great a difference as divides high-income and middle-income countries...

...What happened to Southern California?

Put simply, Los Angeles' business class, its movers and shakers, were too conservative, too backward looking in their goals and their style to recognize and nurture what would become the new economy...

...In the end, there is no single explanation for L.A.'s long fall from economic grace. It is a story of good intentions and mistaken beliefs, of fragmented business relationships and out-of-date ideas...
Why San Francisco's way of doing business beat Los Angeles' - LA Times

 
Old 10-25-2015, 06:31 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,657 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlasTraveler View Post
Why do people always equate San Francisco as the epicenter of the Bay Area? And tech?

San Jose is larger and Silicone Valley isn't San Francisco.... it's much farther down the peninsula.

San Jose is the anchor city for the CSD - Bay Area.... #5th in the US.
Incorrect. The San Francisco Metro Area accounts for the majority of the Bay Area population and economy. The San Jose Metro Area is less than half the size of SF.

Quote:
The problem with the Bay Area is it is too reliant on technology... it's in these listings because of tech. Similarly, Detroit was once the "Paris of America." A region completely dominated by one industry is too specialized to wield far reaching influence in areas outside its specialty.
The problem with this statement is that 'tech' is not just websites and semiconductors. Every industry in the world is now reliant on technology to grow their business and to become more efficient.

And as such, the Bay Area is now also a major player in automotive, energy, telecommunications, media, life sciences, medical devices etc.



Quote:
LA is similar to NYC -
No actually economically, the Bay Area is a bit more similar to NY while Los Angeles has languished.

Quote:
Don't get me wrong - I love the Bay Area. It's quirky and weird with lots of really bright people. The World is being revolutionized here through technology, but that doesn't mean it's Los Angeles... far from.
Correct. The Bay Area is very far from LA these days. LA is way behind.
 
Old 10-25-2015, 06:32 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadicalAtheist View Post
Cuz the list criteria is contiguous zip codes. SF is small and incomes vary drastically zip code to zip code, too much to string enough zip codes together that meet the other criteria.

understood and the same dynamic plays out everywhere else as well. SF is higher income per capitia generally so am surprised actually and SF is by no means alone with disparity by zip, actually probably less so compared to others on the list
 
Old 10-25-2015, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,657 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
The income difference between these 2 areas is staggering.

Here are the Metro Areas with 1 Million+ population in each region by median family income.

Median Family Income, 2014
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim Metro Area $67,575
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metro Area $61,320

San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Metro Area $100,827
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara Metro Area $107,840
 
Old 10-25-2015, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Westminster/Huntington Beach, CA
1,780 posts, read 1,760,758 times
Reputation: 1218
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
This article came out in the LA Times yesterday...it's titled: Why San Francisco's way of doing business beat Los Angeles'

It simply reiterates what Ive been saying. The Bay Area has taken over as the primary engine of economic growth in California. The Bay Area is the epicenter of the most dynamic industries in California while Los Angeles, once a worthy rival, has really declined over the past 40 years, unable to keep up with San Francisco. This is not hyperbole, it's statistical fact based on years of jobs data, gdp growth data, income growth data, financial markets data etc.

It's almost as if we are now comparing two different countries with different standards of living, at least that's what the LA Times says...



Why San Francisco's way of doing business beat Los Angeles' - LA Times
Yawwwnnnn.

Can we close this thread yet? Everyone else seems to know the answer.

Yes, the Bay Area economy is booming. Good for them. But there is hardly any cultural output from the bay relative to greater LA. It's biggest strength is economics, and it falls pretty far after that.
 
Old 10-25-2015, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
2,985 posts, read 4,884,402 times
Reputation: 3419
Quote:
Originally Posted by NativeOrange View Post
Yawwwnnnn.

Can we close this thread yet? Everyone else seems to know the answer.

Yes, the Bay Area economy is booming. Good for them. But there is hardly any cultural output from the bay relative to greater LA. It's biggest strength is economics, and it falls pretty far after that.
So you're saying that no one cares about SF's economic output compared to "cultural output"? Right...
 
Old 10-25-2015, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Westminster/Huntington Beach, CA
1,780 posts, read 1,760,758 times
Reputation: 1218
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatsbyGatz View Post
So you're saying that no one cares about SF's economic output compared to "cultural output"? Right...
No. Never said that. Anywhere. Just tired of the same old dribble out of Monty.
 
Old 10-25-2015, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,657 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by NativeOrange View Post
Yawwwnnnn.

Can we close this thread yet? Everyone else seems to know the answer.

Yes, the Bay Area economy is booming. Good for them. But there is hardly any cultural output from the bay relative to greater LA. It's biggest strength is economics, and it falls pretty far after that.
Nope. This is 2015, nobody cares about the fall TV lineup on the CW--and quite frankly, nothing very important happens there to be honest. What happens in LA is shocking celebrity gossip...how does that equate to global influence exactly?

TV ratings are dropping like a rock because people find the internet more entertaining.
Broadcast And Cable TV Ratings Keep Declining: Viacom, A&E Struggles Underscore Industry In Flux

Furthermore,
LAs cultural contribution is very weak compared to how the Bay Area has permeated into people's daily lives. LA creates some creative content but at this point, the Bay Area controls the flow of information around the world.
 
Old 10-25-2015, 01:05 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 1,437,252 times
Reputation: 354
Lol, you do know Netflix takes up more bandwith than anything else. It's not Netflix itself. It's the movies and TV shows, which comes from LA.

Nobody cares about Netflix if LA doesn't supply the content. It's a no brainer.

I dont think you understand people go to the internet to watch movies and their tv shows rather than watch it on cable. Broadcast and TV are stuff that's headquartered in NYC more than LA.

All LA does is provide the content for the channels.
 
Old 10-25-2015, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,657 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy K View Post
Lol, you do know Netflix takes up more bandwith than anything else. It's not Netflix itself. It's the movies and TV shows, which comes from LA.

Nobody cares about Netflix if LA doesn't supply the content. It's a no brainer.

I dont think you understand people go to the internet to watch movies and their tv shows rather than watch it on cable.
Yawns and it's so SAD that you refuse to see what everyone else sees. THIS WAS IN THE LA TIMES YESTERDAY:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Los Angeles Times
...What happened to Southern California?

Put simply, Los Angeles' business class, its movers and shakers, were too conservative, too backward looking in their goals and their style to recognize and nurture what would become the new economy...

...In the end, there is no single explanation for L.A.'s long fall from economic grace. It is a story of good intentions and mistaken beliefs, of fragmented business relationships and out-of-date ideas...
You pin all of your hopes on LA's sickly and shrinking entertainment industry. I actually feel sorry for you.

I can talk about the Bay Area kicking serious @** in many industries, it's quite breathtaking. On the other hand, your biggest bragging point is Bay Area companies expanding their presence in LA. That's really telling.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top