Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you think NYC will still be the largest city in 2050?
Yes 628 81.56%
No 142 18.44%
Voters: 770. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-15-2009, 07:42 PM
 
28 posts, read 90,293 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

I think Orange County will see more growth than L.A. True, it's not one city, but in 40 years that will probably change. At least people will perceive OC as one city.

I think most of the growth will take place in Anaheim, near the platinum triangle.

Orange County - population six to eight million people in 2050.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-15-2009, 07:55 PM
 
1,868 posts, read 3,068,800 times
Reputation: 1627
I think i read a census projection for 25 years from now a while back and it listed NYC as still the most populous metro region.

I think it was...

NYC
LA
Chicago
Dallas
Houston
Atlanta


Who knows really though. We might all be dead in 2012 anyway! :P
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2009, 11:19 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
654 posts, read 1,910,472 times
Reputation: 911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spire View Post
Out of context. It's because of how much Houston and Pheonix are sprawled. Houston and Pheonix are nowhere near as Urban as Philadelphia. Philadelphia has over 10,000 people per square mile, Phoenix is just below 3,000, and Houston is just over 3,300.

Basically what I'm saying is Houston and Pheonix are examples of overgrown suburbia, not that that's bad, while Philadelphia has earned the traditional meaning of a city.
Is Phoenix so freaking hard to spell? Over and over I see it misspelled on this thread. Make it stop!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2009, 11:23 PM
 
Location: Surprise, AZ
8,634 posts, read 10,152,688 times
Reputation: 8002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marat View Post
Is Phoenix so freaking hard to spell? Over and over I see it misspelled on this thread. Make it stop!
Thanks! Can we also add Tucson to the spelling list?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 07:04 AM
 
141 posts, read 480,165 times
Reputation: 82
NYC

L.A

CHI/HOU

PHX

But there is to many unknows to really no what will happen
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 07:16 AM
 
Location: USA
13,255 posts, read 12,129,807 times
Reputation: 4228
1) NYC (Just don't see any other cities catching up to its city or metro)
2) LA (See above)
3) Chi (The city seems to be going through a revival)
4) Houston (I see the city continuing to gain population but not at the same rate it has in the past)
5) Dallas or Phoenix
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Czech Republic / United Kingdom
383 posts, read 1,590,304 times
Reputation: 367
Detroit, MI
New Orleans, LA
St. Louis, MO
Gary, IN
Compton, CA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 11:09 AM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,812,854 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marat View Post
Is Phoenix so freaking hard to spell? Over and over I see it misspelled on this thread. Make it stop!
...but it has that strange "o" in it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Avondale and Tempe, Arizona
2,852 posts, read 4,503,358 times
Reputation: 2562
I can imagine Las Vegas overtaking some of the cities that we think of as sustained population centers. Same with Phoenix.

Phoenix and Las Vegas are a lot alike except Las Vegas has more going in the entertainment arena and Phoenix has a better assortment of job opportunities. Both are very fast-growing desert cities that attract lots of new arrivals. Both depend highly on their good weather for economic indicators.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:41 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX (78201)
604 posts, read 1,872,086 times
Reputation: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
My Guess for the Top 10.
New York 9.5 Million
Los Angeles 6.0 Million
Houston 4.0 Million
Chicago 3.3 Million
Phoenix 3.0 Million
San Antonio 2.4 Million
Dallas 2.3 Million
Las Vegas 2.0 Million
San Diego 1.8 Million
Philadelphia 1.6 Million

San Antonio is actually projected to have 2.4 mil by 2020...
I think Dallas and Houston would have more ppl by 2050 as well
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top