Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Select all metros that you would describe as "big cities"
New York 552 83.89%
Los Angeles 526 79.94%
Chicago 538 81.76%
Dallas 396 60.18%
Philadelphia 480 72.95%
Houston 418 63.53%
Miami 383 58.21%
Atlanta 380 57.75%
Washington DC 430 65.35%
Boston 436 66.26%
Detroit 307 46.66%
Phoenix 246 37.39%
San Francisco 453 68.84%
Inland Empire, CA 34 5.17%
Seattle 342 51.98%
Minneapolis 249 37.84%
San Diego 214 32.52%
St. Louis 175 26.60%
Tampa 117 17.78%
Baltimore 213 32.37%
Denver 242 36.78%
Pittsburgh 170 25.84%
Portland 123 18.69%
Cincinnati 142 21.58%
Sacramento 91 13.83%
Cleveland 167 25.38%
Orlando 100 15.20%
San Antonio 128 19.45%
Kansas City 134 20.36%
Las Vegas 143 21.73%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 658. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-03-2017, 02:52 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Gilead
12,716 posts, read 7,805,986 times
Reputation: 11338

Advertisements

Everything over 2 million is a "big city." Metro areas between 1 and 2 million depend on the metro. I would consider New Orleans and Louisville big cities but would not consider OKC as such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2017, 09:56 AM
 
89 posts, read 140,487 times
Reputation: 101
Why is Cincinnati considered a "big city" and Indianapolis is not? Both cities are the same size.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 10:49 AM
 
5,546 posts, read 6,870,564 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjb122982 View Post
Why is Cincinnati considered a "big city" and Indianapolis is not? Both cities are the same size.
For the same reason some people didn't vote for NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 10:51 AM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,904,687 times
Reputation: 27274
It's relative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 07:32 PM
 
205 posts, read 249,318 times
Reputation: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDX_LAX View Post
Is it based on feel? Strictly population? What else? (we're talking about metros, not propers)

Elaborate.
In general, I'd say a big city is relative to the surrounding metro area. It also is the density, and the greater vibrancy compared to its suburbs in terms of amenities.

I'd say for a good metro, the city proper should have a population of at least 250,000 with a population density of at least 1,900 people per square mile, and with a metro area or CSA of over 1,100,000 million.

A large city should be able to support amenities like multiple movie theaters, a vibrant downtown filled with unique independent restaurants, Shops galore, and bars and brewpubs and breweries; and it should also have plenty of vibrant historic neighborhoods (even if some are mixed in with a few bad neighborhoods) and have a good 4 year or Masters of doctorate level college in it or nearby, as well as several heavy industry or logistics works taking place in the city and its suburbs and exurbs.

In the greater area should be plenty of vibrant suburbs, with several lifestyle or regional shopping centers, maybe one superregional shopping center. There should be an abundance and good variety of chain restaurants and variety in shopping options.

Maybe a Wal-Mart or two in the exurbs in the counties surrounding the city would make some good shopping, but only in the most basic of areas in the exurbs.

Anything else would work just fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2017, 08:13 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,848,510 times
Reputation: 8651
Are you describing your home town?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2017, 07:33 AM
 
5,546 posts, read 6,870,564 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by emmerich01 View Post
In general, I'd say a big city is relative to the surrounding metro area. It also is the density, and the greater vibrancy compared to its suburbs in terms of amenities.

I'd say for a good metro, the city proper should have a population of at least 250,000 with a population density of at least 1,900 people per square mile, and with a metro area or CSA of over 1,100,000 million.

A large city should be able to support amenities like multiple movie theaters, a vibrant downtown filled with unique independent restaurants, Shops galore, and bars and brewpubs and breweries; and it should also have plenty of vibrant historic neighborhoods (even if some are mixed in with a few bad neighborhoods) and have a good 4 year or Masters of doctorate level college in it or nearby, as well as several heavy industry or logistics works taking place in the city and its suburbs and exurbs.

In the greater area should be plenty of vibrant suburbs, with several lifestyle or regional shopping centers, maybe one superregional shopping center. There should be an abundance and good variety of chain restaurants and variety in shopping options.

Maybe a Wal-Mart or two in the exurbs in the counties surrounding the city would make some good shopping, but only in the most basic of areas in the exurbs.

Anything else would work just fine.
Wow, that's an incredibly low population density. That's just above the density of the entire state of NJ. Only 4 cities in the top 5 largest cities have a population density lower.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._by_population
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2017, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Orlando Metro Area
3,595 posts, read 6,944,113 times
Reputation: 2409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
As long as it looks and functions like a big city, it is one to me. Honolulu has less than 1M people and it feels/looks much larger.
This is what most non city info buffs probably go by. It's also very relative based on where you've lived, etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Buster View Post
Orlando is similar in metro size to Charlotte but its not urban.
I would hesitate to call either one "big" cities, but they are both highly urbanized. Orlando being the larger UA and denser metro but CLT having a taller more "big city" looking and feeling skyline/Uptown. The light rail also boosts the big city quotient if were comparing DTs, but ORL has a very active and beautiful city core so good on both places regarding that.

Just driving around the metro immediately outside the core and beyond, Orlando does feel more developed and busier. We also have more clusters of intrest than does Charlotte. Both cities have top notch and tremendously busy airports for their size.

No clear winner here and it's not really a competition. Both big metros, midsized cities, with very bright futures and lots to be proud of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2017, 05:29 AM
 
14,019 posts, read 14,998,668 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Soul Bro View Post
It's all about perspective, but for me any metro above 1 mill is a big city. Being from Macon, GA (150,000 city proper, 230,000+ metro, 417,000+ CSA), many people from the countless dozens and dozens of truly small and rural towns across Middle and South Georgia consider coming here or to Savannah, Augusta, Montgomery, Columbus, Tallahassee, etc. as going to a "large" city. Going to a Jacksonville or Birmingham would definitely be a trip to a "big city" to them (and most of us). It seems many on here talk from the perspective of being from and/or used to very large cities like Boston, NY, Chicago, etc. There are a ton more smaller metros, rural, and small towns than there are major cities. So, I think to your average person in Basic Town, USA a "big" city would be most places with metros of 1 mill+
I would disagree, even people in Buffalo, Birmingham, Rochester, Grand Rapids etc seem to recognize they don't live in a "Big City" even though the metros are all 1M+. Residents start believing they live in a big city at ~2M.
I think if you asked Clevelanders or Kansas Citians they live in a major city the results would be ~65/35 yes, in Buffalo or El Paso the answer would be probably 80/20 no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2017, 06:25 AM
 
Location: North Raleigh x North Sacramento
5,819 posts, read 5,620,852 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
I would disagree, even people in Buffalo, Birmingham, Rochester, Grand Rapids etc seem to recognize they don't live in a "Big City" even though the metros are all 1M+. Residents start believing they live in a big city at ~2M.
I think if you asked Clevelanders or Kansas Citians they live in a major city the results would be ~65/35 yes, in Buffalo or El Paso the answer would be probably 80/20 no.
Buffalonians And Rochesterians definitely think they live in a big city. What you'll get is, if asking is Buffalo big compared to Cleveland, is "we're not that big, but we're the 2nd biggest city in New York." Same thing for Rochester: "We're bigger than everybody else in New York besides The City and Buffalo"...

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrlFlaUsa View Post
This is what most non city info buffs probably go by. It's also very relative based on where you've lived, etc.



I would hesitate to call either one "big" cities, but they are both highly urbanized. Orlando being the larger UA and denser metro but CLT having a taller more "big city" looking and feeling skyline/Uptown. The light rail also boosts the big city quotient if were comparing DTs, but ORL has a very active and beautiful city core so good on both places regarding that.

Just driving around the metro immediately outside the core and beyond, Orlando does feel more developed and busier. We also have more clusters of intrest than does Charlotte. Both cities have top notch and tremendously busy airports for their size.

No clear winner here and it's not really a competition. Both big metros, midsized cities, with very bright futures and lots to be proud of.
Charlotte's UA is misleading because for some reason Concord (215,000) has its own UA, Gastonia has its own UA (169,000), and Rock Hill has its own UA (105,000), all of which are not only in the metro, but in adjacent counties. Add those figures into Charlotte's official UA, and Charlotte's UA more accurately reflects it's relation to peer cities, at 1,738,814, which is over 200,000 more than Orlando, and in line with other peers like Vegas, Portland, Cleveland, San An, and Pittsburgh...

They are both big cities; they aren't small cities...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top