Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Better scenery?
Los Angeles 263 75.79%
Chicago 84 24.21%
Voters: 347. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2013, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,890,665 times
Reputation: 4054

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
Once you take away the beautiful beaches and coastline and Mediterranean-looking hills and occasionally snow-capped rugged peaks on the northern horizon, what does Los Angeles really have?

It's basically Detroit with palm trees, at least that's what Don Draper said the other night. (I just wanted to use that line, I don't actually believe it)
Haha I wanted to use that line too! Note it was 1969 Detroit he was talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2013, 01:52 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,555,356 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Haha I wanted to use that line too! Note it was 1969 Detroit he was talking about.
Yeah, and in the same episode Pete Campbell said the Detroit Airport circa 1968 looked like Calcutta. I guess Detroit didn't really hit the skids until the 70s though...

"Detroit with palm trees" though is now one of my favorite city put-downs on a TV series along with the time a character on the Sopranos referred to Boston by saying "That place is Scranton...with clams".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2019, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
2,752 posts, read 2,420,381 times
Reputation: 3158
This is like me asking: "Which city has better public transit, LA or Chicago?"

If you have even the slightest of knowledge about either city, the answer should be obvious...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2019, 04:36 PM
 
381 posts, read 351,315 times
Reputation: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by CCrest182 View Post
This is like me asking: "Which city has better public transit, LA or Chicago?"

If you have even the slightest of knowledge about either city, the answer should be obvious...
Way to bring up a thread from before I was even born.


If you dropped me on the side of the Chicago river or even up in Lincoln Park.... Chicago would win due to the man made awe.

But even a ghetto basic neighborhood in LA that is elevated will beat Chicago due to just being able to see a lot more.
Like the Pino in East L.A. sitting atop of a hill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2019, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
2,752 posts, read 2,420,381 times
Reputation: 3158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago_Person View Post
Way to bring up a thread from before I was even born.


If you dropped me on the side of the Chicago river or even up in Lincoln Park.... Chicago would win due to the man made awe.

But even a ghetto basic neighborhood in LA that is elevated will beat Chicago due to just being able to see a lot more.
Like the Pino in East L.A. sitting atop of a hill
Yeah I hate bumping threads, but I saw this in the "Similar Threads" section and thought it was a ridiculous question. Had to say something lol

Btw, you're very young.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2019, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Chicago
6,359 posts, read 8,861,183 times
Reputation: 5871
Chicago guy here.

The answer is obvious:

Los Angeles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2019, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,851 posts, read 5,906,667 times
Reputation: 11467
Overall, LA pretty easily. If you are limiting to “downtown scenery,” I prefer Chicago, but overall scenery (palm trees, mountains, water, etc)- LA takes it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2019, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Portsmouth, VA
6,509 posts, read 8,476,514 times
Reputation: 3822
Strange thread.

I like Chicago, but I think that LA has more going on for it, with valleys, hills, etc. More varied topography.

Voted Chicago anyway out of spite due to the audacity of the thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2019, 10:39 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,273 posts, read 39,596,627 times
Reputation: 21340
Maybe Chicago should build a mountain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2019, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Portsmouth, VA
6,509 posts, read 8,476,514 times
Reputation: 3822
Quote:
Originally Posted by oycrumbler View Post
maybe chicago should build a mountain.
ikr
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top