Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-05-2015, 05:40 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,406,698 times
Reputation: 4025

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macgregorsailor51 View Post
Since when did the GOP and the Koch bros start giving a damn about the working class?
I never argued such
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-05-2015, 08:08 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,375,883 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
Obama is a Democrat, is he not?

Don't at like Big Money Corporate Democrats are not in the same camp as Republicans. If your argument is Elizabeth Warren, fine. Barack Obama is not a liberal; he is a neoliberal corporate Democrat (along with Clinton).
Make you a deal, I wont vote for Obama, or my local rep Wyden if you wont vote for anyone on your team that votes to fast track or pass TPP.

Maybe you should actually check your local reps opinion, this is being protested by mainly Democrats....most of the Republicans are on board....and working with Obama on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2015, 09:18 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,867,563 times
Reputation: 18304
This has been on agenda long before Obama. Now days the senate and house are powerful in doing their own thing on subjects like this. Likely the final agreement will come long after Obama is gone anyway. Not much different than swing to east after cold war and much like the pact made by EU. Not a currency union just agreements on trade. Been happening for decades in the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2015, 09:23 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,639 posts, read 18,235,725 times
Reputation: 34515
I agree. The secrecy and the way that the administration/GOP leaders are pushing this thing is very suspect to me. If a plan is truly good, let's debate it out in the open.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2015, 10:20 PM
 
1,820 posts, read 1,655,355 times
Reputation: 1091
The founders went to a lot of trouble to keep the masses from being involved in any significant way in the new government. Seems to me that they might have been onto something there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2015, 10:54 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,867 posts, read 25,154,836 times
Reputation: 19089
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
its amazing to see statists argue in favor of lack of transparency in government. our elected criminals are certainly no better than us. 99% of everything that is currently "classified" should be public knowledge.
True.

But diplomatic negotiations are one of those things that are in the 1%. Once a proposed final version is hashed out, then it should become public knowledge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2015, 07:49 AM
 
Location: Durham, North Carolina
774 posts, read 1,857,712 times
Reputation: 1496
Default .. and you helped them

Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/17/bu...rtnership.html

This is essentially NAFTA for the Pacific. Obama is trying to fast track this without public support.
You're Right ... and Wrong.

Obama did help ram-rod the REPUBLICAN Bill through. (Remember who is the Majority of so-called, "Law Makers" right now?)

It looks like a done deal. Game over.
The U.S. hasn't been a Democracy for a very long time. We're not even a Republic. We live in an Oligarchy that with each additional Billionaire, becomes more aristocratic and Oligarchial.

It's a done deal serfs.
This Trans-Pacific International Trade Agreement gave what was left away to the international cartel of the super rich. It's disgusting. They play us like the puppets we are. Distract us with idiotic stuff ... "Obama is going to invade Texas !" ... and the size of Kim's butt, and racism and distractions like homophobia or some new war threat ... when all along the main agenda is your money.

And people go along with it.
Well, I hope people are finally happy being divide over one thing or another because the corporations own you now. They were already more powerful than the U.S. government ... now the weak serfs have to pay them (through wage-slave taxation) for everything ... real and imagined ... and all most nim-wits can think about is that "Obama is Colored!! "

Idiots keep letting the super rich screw them in exchange for the allure of confirming their narrow-minded lunacy. Now this bill appears to be the last nail in the coffin. The lineage of the Norman Conquest lives and laughs. Citizens = serfs and indentured servants now... and you will pay them even more now for the costs of your chains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2015, 08:08 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,705,240 times
Reputation: 24590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malloric View Post
True.

But diplomatic negotiations are one of those things that are in the 1%. Once a proposed final version is hashed out, then it should become public knowledge.
then they shouldnt be asking for any special privileges until we know the details.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2015, 08:55 AM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,710,630 times
Reputation: 25616
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
i believe the accusation has been that china is keeping their currently cheap to give them a competitive advantage. im not exactly sure how they accomplish that but thats the typical complaint, not that america is keeping its currency overvalued.
We can't devalue our currency as it is because we are a consumption driven society. If we compete with China in a currency battle, nobody wins but we lose more. China is a socialist country, they can subsidize necessities for the people and influence prices. If we were to devalue our currency and suddenly oil and commodity prices shot up by 200-300%, any politician in power will be yanked out right way.

We can't compete with a socialist/communist country directly via currency. They're doing big businesses a favor by making buying their goods cheaper and sell it here at a premium but at the expense of smaller businesses that are at a cost disadvantage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2015, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,668 posts, read 6,596,333 times
Reputation: 4817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Barbara View Post
The Fed's mission is to pursue maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates. Where exactly does keeping the US$ "perpetually overvalued to force a trade deficit, so the US can be a big "sink" for foreign production" fit in? How did all that QE stuff come into play?
QE was awesome for bailing out the banks and inflating the stock market. That's it.

The Fed controls treasury sales. If we run a trade deficit with a country, then they have to buy US treasuries. Specifically, interest rates were too high up until the **** hit the fan in 2008.

It wasn't only the Fed though, the federal government was all-in with this "project". Perpetual stimulus via tax cuts, deficit spending, and loose credit all boosted the US$ value and the trade deficit.

Quote:
So far, it seems that we have only gotten richer by doing whatever it is that we have been doing.
I guess it depends on who you define as "we". The "owners" of the US have done great. Pretty much no one else though.

From 1864 to 1934 real income increased by 3x. About 1.6%/yr.
From 1934 to 1974 real income increased by 3.5x. About 3.2%/yr.
From 1974 to 2014 real income increased not at all. About 0.0%/yr.




Per capita GDP has grown at the good clip since 1974. Right on our long term trend of 1.9%/yr.



So where did the wealth go? Most of it to some select group of mega-rich.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top