Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-16-2012, 04:18 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,956,603 times
Reputation: 5661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Well finally the Bainers admit they are fishing. They know none of their Bainer questions can be answered by a tax return. I suspect he will release them soon. And just like the birthers when Obama's BC was released, the Bainers will look foolish.
The fact that you call them "Bainers" as if to equate them with "birthers," who have absolutely been discredited with contrary evidence says a great deal.

The fact is that it is customary for Presidential candidates to release multiple years of tax returns. John McCain was an exception and only released two years. Romney's father released a dozen years.

Where there is smoke there is fire. Romney Jr. would have released more if there wasn't something to hide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2012, 05:30 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,760,703 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
The fact that you call them "Bainers" as if to equate them with "birthers," who have absolutely been discredited with contrary evidence says a great deal.

The fact is that it is customary for Presidential candidates to release multiple years of tax returns. John McCain was an exception and only released two years. Romney's father released a dozen years.

Where there is smoke there is fire. Romney Jr. would have released more if there wasn't something to hide.
Lol, as if his tax returns and the dates of his tenure at Bain have any thing to do with each other. Thats a good one. Ok so back to reality. The Bainers have been discredited by contrary evidence by the MSM and are now joined by the Huffington Post. They are kooks who now count Obama amongst their number. It's a problem for him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,956,603 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Lol, as if his tax returns and the dates of his tenure at Bain have any thing to do with each other. Thats a good one. Ok so back to reality. The Bainers have been discredited by contrary evidence by the MSM and are now joined by the Huffington Post. They are kooks who now count Obama amongst their number. It's a problem for him.
If Romney's tax returns for pre-2010 show that he paid no taxes at all due to his slick tax avoidance schemes, that's an embarrassment that nobody can deny. They may also show how much compensation he earned from Bain while he was 'not involved.' That's also an embarrassment.

Moreover, the Huffington Post doesn't discredit the claims. They underscore them: Mitt Romney 'Legally' Bain Capital CEO Until 2002, Former Partner Says (VIDEO)

Quote:
A former Bain Capital partner acknowledged Sunday that Mitt Romney "legally" remained the head of the private equity firm until 2002, contradicting Romney's claims that he left the company in February 1999.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 06:00 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,863,405 times
Reputation: 4585
Why won't the Mittster release? Hmmmm...

Why Won't Romney Release More Tax Returns? : The New Yorker
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 06:07 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,760,703 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
If Romney's tax returns for pre-2010 show that he paid no taxes at all due to his slick tax avoidance schemes, that's an embarrassment that nobody can deny. They may also show how much compensation he earned from Bain while he was 'not involved.' That's also an embarrassment.

Moreover, the Huffington Post doesn't discredit the claims. They underscore them: Mitt Romney 'Legally' Bain Capital CEO Until 2002, Former Partner Says (VIDEO)
Then you haven't read the link I posted. From the link above.

"The nonpartisan group Factcheck.org has investigated the claims made by President Obama stating that Mitt Romney, during his time at Bain Capital, outsourced jobs overseas. Factcheck.org researched the issue and found the president's claims to be untrue and based on evidence that was "weak or non-existent." The organization released an additional statement after The Boston Globe published its much ballyhooed report. Factcheck continued to say they saw "little new in any of these SEC filings" and that "none of the SEC filings show that Romney was anything but a passive, absentee owner during that time, as both Romney and Bain have long said." The Washington Post fact-checker, Glenn Kessler, also refuted the accusations: "Just because you are listed as an owner of shares does not mean you have a managerial role." There have also been several legal and economic scholars that have weighed who also find the claims against Romney to be dubious. Yet, President Obama continues to run the deceptive attack ads anyway. It appears that the promises of "Hope & Change" have been totally thrown out of the Obama re-election campaign."

But you have swerved into the truth. It is a fishing expedition intended to embarass. It is cler for all to see. Independents aren't fond of games like this. The economy is in shambles, the middle class is hurting, the gap between rich and poor is greatest in history, his administration is corrupt. Yet he engages in stupid games like this. The reality is, he has no choice.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...FXmW_blog.html

"So the Obama team has shot its wad. Its opponent has more ammo and more money now. Romney hasn’t been mortally wounded. And there isn’t money from Obama to keep up the 4-to-1 spending barrage. In fact without it, Obama might well have fallen behind in the race. So the Obama team pleads for money and turns up the volume of the attacks. (After calling Romney a criminal in July, what’s left for September and October?)

Obama is now committed to a strategy that isn’t working. He’s left to unleash his attack dogs and to pray for a miracle. Maybe the economy will rebound. Perhaps Romney will implode or pick a Sarah-Palin-type for vice president.

The reason, you see, that Obama’s camp has become so frantic in July is that its ineffectiveness in the summer subjects its side to grave risks. Having to defend his record, rely on his debate prowess and be evaluated on the economy over the last three years is as risky as, well, as sending thousands across a vast, empty field as enemy fire rains down upon them."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 06:26 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,956,603 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Then you haven't read the link I posted. From the link above.
Yes, I did read it and it is dated and all available information wasn't available for them. The Huff Post piece was 15 hours ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,760,703 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Yes, I did read it and it is dated and all available information wasn't available for them. The Huff Post piece was 15 hours ago.
Lol, of course you didn't read it!

From the link.

"" The organization released an additional statement after The Boston Globe published its much ballyhooed report. Factcheck continued to say they saw "little new in any of these SEC filings" and that "none of the SEC filings show that Romney was anything but a passive, absentee owner "

It is completely up I date. Silly Bainer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 06:52 AM
 
13,694 posts, read 9,016,074 times
Reputation: 10417
I will simply observe that the Constitution requires that a President of the United States be 1) a natural born US citizen; 2) at least 35 years of age and 3) been a resident within the United States for fourteen years.

As a True Conservative I reject the notion that a candidate must produce income tax returns or school records. It is simply not a requirement.

Of course, the Democratic or Republican party may impose their own requirements concerning their own nominees, if they choose to do so. The Constitution makes no reference to a President being a member of either party.

Those who demand that Mr. Romney submit any tax returns whatsoever are probably not inclined to vote for him anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 07:14 AM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,497,657 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Lol, of course you didn't read it!

From the link.

"" The organization released an additional statement after The Boston Globe published its much ballyhooed report. Factcheck continued to say they saw "little new in any of these SEC filings" and that "none of the SEC filings show that Romney was anything but a passive, absentee owner "

It is completely up I date. Silly Bainer.
NPR ran a lengthy report on the Bain Scandal. Replays of interviews with Mr. Romney, journalists who broke the stories, etc. Bottom line: He ran the organization. People can pick at small threads which are almost all insignificant, but he was in on all the big decisions. I think that's been establised beyond doubt. He should not just fess-up to his involvement and get the issue behind him. Or the scandal, and the scandal over hidden assest, foreign government contributions to his PACs, etc., will consume him and he'll fight from the Convention to Election Day on ground the Obama campaign will have defined.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 07:21 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,760,703 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
NPR ran a lengthy report on the Bain Scandal. Replays of interviews with Mr. Romney, journalists who broke the stories, etc. Bottom line: He ran the organization. People can pick at small threads which are almost all insignificant, but he was in on all the big decisions. I think that's been establised beyond doubt. He should not just fess-up to his involvement and get the issue behind him. Or the scandal, and the scandal over hidden assest, foreign government contributions to his PACs, etc., will consume him and he'll fight from the Convention to Election Day on ground the Obama campaign will have defined.
You see what I mean about Bainers? In the face of overwhelming evidence they continue to insist they are right. They are simply no different than birthers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top