Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-04-2012, 12:50 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post

Hahahahahaha.......The chart that proves he promised that came from the White House website.

Then the Wall Street Journal article (dated from when he said it) ALSO backs-up the chart.

NO ONE has stated that he ever said it would never go above 8% anyhow.

What he DID say was that it would be at 5.2% by now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-04-2012, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,958,729 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Hahahahahaha.......The chart that proves he promised that came from the White House website.

Then the Wall Street Journal article (dated from when he said it) ALSO backs-up the chart.

NO ONE has stated that he ever said it would never go above 8% anyhow.

What he DID say was that it would be at 5.2% by now.
charts don't make promises.

As Politifact said, The administration never characterized it as a promise and included plenty of disclaimers saying the predictions had "significant margins of error" and a higher degree of uncertainty due to a recession that is "unusual both in its fundamental causes and its severity." It was an economic projection with warnings of a high margin for error, not a take-it-to-the-bank pledge of an upper limit on unemployment.

Nobody at the time knew that the economic downturn was a negative 6% of GDP. Given what they thought they knew at the time, the economic team made a prediction and said it could be wrong.

You want to call that a promise? Go right ahead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2012, 02:57 PM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,702,384 times
Reputation: 5132
Default How quickly some forget...

FLASHBACK: Obama: My Presidency Will Be 'A One-Term Proposition' If Economy Doesn't Turn In 3 Years - YouTube

He promised to leave, and now he wants more time. That's another promise he's broken.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2012, 04:17 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
charts don't make promises.

OMG!!!!!! Liberals tried to say bull-eyes on a MAP meant Palin wanted someone SHOT for god's sake!!!

This CHART was on the White House Website boasting about how the stimulus would save the economy and jobs!!!!

But...nevermind, we didn't really mean it huh? You've GOT to be kidding? That is the lamest thing I ever heard.

Quote:
As Politifact said
Screw PolitFact...they are the White House's apology dog.

Quote:
Nobody at the time knew that the economic downturn was a negative 6% of GDP.
They didn't know? That's the SECOND lamest thing I ever heard! It's only his JOB to KNOW!!!!!

Quote:
You want to call that a promise? Go right ahead.
Call it anything you want too, but putting that chart up on the White House website and telling people that if they got the Stimulus passed that would be the result sure does seem an awful lot like a promise!!

I'll bet you wouldn't excuse Bush so quickly.

Besides....Obama and his adminstration talked about it AND they RELEASED a big thick blue BOOK detailing HOW it would accomplish that.

Which is how the Wall Street Journal got it's information about his plan. If they "didn't know it" then why does the Wall Steet Journal talk about that fact?:



The Wall Street Journal reported:

The famed Rosy Scenario, coined in the early days of the Reagan White House when large tax cuts and higher defense spending were assumed to be paid for in part by strong economic growth, is a cornerstone of the Obama administration’s first multiyear budget.

After contracting at a 1.2% rate in 2009, a more modest drop than the Congressional Budget Office and Blue Chip Consensus forecasts assume, the White House sees growth domestic product growth snapping back by 3.2% next year and then 4% or higher the three years after that.

........................


The unemployment rate at the end of President Barack Obama‘s term in 2013 will be just 5.2%, according to the White House. The rate currently sits at 7.6%, and many economists expect it to climb past 9% before the recession ends. A report Thursday showing jobless claims at a 26-year high supports the more pessimistic forecasts, at least in the short run.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2012, 04:20 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,839,921 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimar View Post
LOL @ responding to your own post... twice.

Get some fresh air dude!!
I've notced that as well. There's an edit button. They don't use it. I think they just like bumping their own threads to somehow make it seem relevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2012, 04:22 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Ford View Post
I've notced that as well. There's an edit button. They don't use it. I think they just like bumping their own threads to somehow make it seem relevant.

Not when I have a sock-puppet to do it for me...thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 09:44 AM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,425,615 times
Reputation: 1179
In Washington DC unemployment is down in the 5% range.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 10:48 AM
 
1,698 posts, read 1,823,677 times
Reputation: 777
Quote:
Originally Posted by eRayP View Post
In Washington DC unemployment is down in the 5% range.
*buzzer*

Do you ever write something that you haven't just made up?

It's at 9%. You've never been to D.C., have you?

Unemployment in the U.S. - Google Public Data Explorer

In the metropolitan D.C. area., which is enormous and spans 3 states, it is 5.7%.

Region
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 11:21 AM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,425,615 times
Reputation: 1179
Washington Metro Division Shows an Overall Increase of 11,000 Jobs in June | does

(Washington, DC) - The District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (DOES) reported today that the preliminary June job estimates show an increase of 11,000 jobs for a total of 2,477,600 jobs in the Washington Metropolitan Division. The public sector decreased by 2,400 jobs, accompanied by an increase of 13,400 private sector jobs. The Washington Metropolitan Division's not seasonally adjusted June 2012 unemployment rate was 5.8 percent, which is up 0.4 percent from the May rate of 5.4 percent.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2012, 11:23 AM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,425,615 times
Reputation: 1179
Regardless, Obama is doing a terrible job and has not done a thing for middle America but spend our money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top