Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Really? Because I just found more articles about it and this one I liked to was just posted an hour ago.
If you hadn't already woken up to the dangers of trusting the echo chamber, I would've thought events over the last few days would have made for an object lesson? You're falling into the unskewed polls trap again.
Look out leaners, here comes another story about last week's election. I have ducked so you can start throwing your crap. I would like to have some real proof that this woman is wrong about what she says but don't think you can find any of that good old leaner proof.
I do not have proof of what she says but I am pretty sure that none of you can prove what she says to be untrue either. Maybe you know the proper words to prompt some search engine to find what you need so get to work.
I couldn't believe it when she said that one woman said she voted 4 times. It wouldn't take more than half a million people like that to get him ahead.
I believe it, because the Democrats have been pulling this kind of crap for years. Thanks to ACORN, (which you may remember Obama worked for) these techniques have been honed a fine art.
Ohio was excited for Romney. He drew huge crowds; much larger than Obama, and they were energized crowds. That Romney lost Ohio just doesn't fit with what we saw. I'm positive there was fraud, and lots of it!
I believe it, because the Democrats have been pulling this kind of crap for years. Thanks to ACORN, (which you may remember Obama worked for) these techniques have been honed a fine art.
Ohio was excited for Romney. He drew huge crowds; much larger than Obama, and they were energized crowds. That Romney lost Ohio just doesn't fit with what we saw. I'm positive there was fraud, and lots of it!
Aha, proponents of faith-based election results don't need proof.
Look out leaners, here comes another story about last week's election. I have ducked so you can start throwing your crap. I would like to have some real proof that this woman is wrong about what she says but don't think you can find any of that good old leaner proof.
I do not have proof of what she says but I am pretty sure that none of you can prove what she says to be untrue either. Maybe you know the proper words to prompt some search engine to find what you need so get to work.
I couldn't believe it when she said that one woman said she voted 4 times. It wouldn't take more than half a million people like that to get him ahead.
Maybe you should get some proof, ever think of that?
Here's an idea - you get to work on that search, since you have a lot of time on your hands.
This election has made you more hysterical than usual, it seems.
This says about all you need to know from that article:
Reputable polls and pundits did not predict an easy win for Romney. They didn't even predict a win at all for Romney. Sane people using real data all concluded that Romney was going to lose, and that's exactly what happened.
Of course, that must be it cause there is no way Romney could of lost this election.....I see you are still in the denial stage, don't worry good buddy, you will make it through this and finally make it to acceptance....have you thought about seeking therapy to help you through these troubled times?
You didn't even read the article.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
