Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I believe it, because the Democrats have been pulling this kind of crap for years. Thanks to ACORN, (which you may remember Obama worked for) these techniques have been honed a fine art.
Ohio was excited for Romney. He drew huge crowds; much larger than Obama, and they were energized crowds. That Romney lost Ohio just doesn't fit with what we saw. I'm positive there was fraud, and lots of it!
Nope, Ohio fits exactly as the polls showed as did the polling for the rest of the states.
Look out leaners, here comes another story about last week's election. I have ducked so you can start throwing your crap. I would like to have some real proof that this woman is wrong about what she says but don't think you can find any of that good old leaner proof.
I do not have proof of what she says but I am pretty sure that none of you can prove what she says to be untrue either. Maybe you know the proper words to prompt some search engine to find what you need so get to work.
I couldn't believe it when she said that one woman said she voted 4 times. It wouldn't take more than half a million people like that to get him ahead.
I believe it, because the Democrats have been pulling this kind of crap for years. Thanks to ACORN, (which you may remember Obama worked for) these techniques have been honed a fine art.
Ohio was excited for Romney. He drew huge crowds; much larger than Obama, and they were energized crowds. That Romney lost Ohio just doesn't fit with what we saw. I'm positive there was fraud, and lots of it!
2012 Is The Year Of Nate Silver And The Prediction Geeks
**Silver's bold predictions that Obama would win upset some political pundits who predicted a Romney victory, based on what they perceived as momentum, the enthusiasm of crowds, gut instinct and partisanship.
I believe it, because the Democrats have been pulling this kind of crap for years. Thanks to ACORN, (which you may remember Obama worked for) these techniques have been honed a fine art.
Ohio was excited for Romney. He drew huge crowds; much larger than Obama, and they were energized crowds. That Romney lost Ohio just doesn't fit with what we saw. I'm positive there was fraud, and lots of it!
Oh for God's sake - no one thought Romney was going to win Ohio. No one. Except Karl Rove and anyone using his Republican math.
You were misled again - by that channel that ONLY reports what they think the right-wingers want to hear.
2012 Is The Year Of Nate Silver And The Prediction Geeks
**Silver's bold predictions that Obama would win upset some political pundits who predicted a Romney victory, based on what they perceived as momentum, the enthusiasm of crowds, gut instinct and partisanship.
In the end, it is difficult to argue with hard numbers, though...
What a load of right-wing hysteria on this thread. They have come unglued over this election. How can one have a discussion with persons in denial, speaking in tongues, slobbering, arms flailing wildly? It's impossible.
Election fraud and voter suppression by democrats - when it is republicans who have been caught at it?
Repeating a list of old worn-out Fox narratives as "proof" of fraud, even if none apply. Total desperation!
Give it up guys.
Reminds me of the woman that gained 50 pounds and says her jrans don't fit because they shrunk.
The GOP lost because their candidate was a loser in the Presidential candidate arena for a variety of reasons, not because anyone stole his chances. You already have it right from the Romney camps mouth that their camapaign management sucked and was utilizing incorrect data. Combine that with the repulsive policies and constant lies...does that sound like a recipe for success to you? Nitwits!
Remember how people ridiculed the democrats for alleging voter fraud when GWB was elected?
Now, SOME republicans out there (and certainly on here) have done a fine job making the GOP look like a collection of racists, backwards hillbillies, hateful bigots, insensitive morons, out-to-lunch-tin-foil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorists, and misogynists. So much so, that moderate conservatives have simply been drowned out and that the recent election was lost.
Are you going to throw out any more insults ladled with sophomoric slurs and blatant misrepresentations of the truth. Oh yeah, lying is perfectly acceptable. Never mind the fact that you are characterizing Republicans as "racists", "backward hillbillies", "hateful bigots", "insensitive morons", etc., etc., etc., it is other people who are hateful and not you?
Well, that's a relief - so they finally worked out how to do it, eh? Shame they couldn't have perfected the technique twelve years ago and spared us George Bush's idiot son.
Oh for God's sake - no one thought Romney was going to win Ohio. No one. Except Karl Rove and anyone using his Republican math.
You were misled again - by that channel that ONLY reports what they think the right-wingers want to hear.
lolol
I'm loving every minute of this...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
