Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-01-2013, 11:16 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,470,309 times
Reputation: 5305

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
Bill Bolling would've beaten McAuliffe by 20 points. Dems would've stayed home like they did in 2009
Doubt it. Boiling would have been a MUCH better candidate, but I doubt it would be 20 points or anything close. McAuliffe isn't exactly the best candidate for the Dems, but he is certainly stronger than Creigh Deeds was, especially in NOVA. Regardless, we aren't going to find that out since the VA GOP decided to nominate a loon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-01-2013, 11:26 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 25 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,561 posts, read 16,552,753 times
Reputation: 6043
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
It's quite a shame. Mcauliffe would've been beaten by double digits by any moderate Republican
since when do you support Moderate Republicans ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 01:49 AM
 
Location: DFW
2,964 posts, read 3,533,056 times
Reputation: 1835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fancy-Schmancy View Post
Alas for the poor white male...who have been having things their own way for the past 300 years or so and are now weeping over the rise of equality.

At least 2 of your 'points' are happening because men have had all the advantages since, well, forever. 2 & 5 are only true in the last 10 years or so. Prior to that, men lead that 'gender gap' in both medical and college. Get used to the new paradigm, y'all.
What the hell does this post have to do with the Virginia Governor Race? LOL, you liberals.

Last edited by D-Towner; 11-02-2013 at 02:05 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 03:49 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,315,673 times
Reputation: 8958
Default Green Tech Automotive under SEC scrutiny

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fancy-Schmancy View Post
McAuliffe continues to hold a double-digit lead with women...who vote more than men do.
Why would women, who seemed to be the loudest voices against Wall Street types, be for McAuliffe, who is a Wall Street insider, having spent much of his life in banking? He is the Democrat's Mitt Romney in terms of his dealings in banking and venture capitalists.

He has a reputation for shady deals, and now his Green Tech Automotive is under investigation by the SEC.

I don't understand this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 03:58 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,315,673 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fancy-Schmancy View Post
Alas for the poor white male...who have been having things their own way for the past 300 years or so and are now weeping over the rise of equality.

At least 2 of your 'points' are happening because men have had all the advantages since, well, forever. 2 & 5 are only true in the last 10 years or so. Prior to that, men lead that 'gender gap' in both medical and college. Get used to the new paradigm, y'all.
Huh? Who's weeping? I don't think you are describing the majority of men. My wife was a department store General Manager in a large up-scale southern CA department store chain for many years. I am very proud of her (we're both retired now). We raised to lovely daughters together and home schooled them besides. No easy task, but they did well. Our schedule was such that we could both do this.

I have no problem at all with smart and strong women. I love them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 04:02 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,315,673 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Statistical tie means that the margin in the poll is equal to Margin of Error. 4 is not equal to 2.9.

Any "likely voter poll" is going to be wrong. For example Last year, Rassmussen defined a "likely voter" as anyone who had voted in the last 2 presidential elections. That means anyone who had turned 18 in 08 and voted for the first time was not called a likely voter. Anyone who turned 18 after 2008 and was planning on voting for the first time was not counted as a likely voter. That poll had Romney 49, Obama 48 (11/03/12), as you know. Romney actually lost by 3.9%
Likely voter polls are the most accurate. Polls of people not likely to vote are meaningless. Any pollster will tell you this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 04:33 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,315,673 times
Reputation: 8958
Default Women like the Wall Street banker, scandal ridden types?

Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Cuccinelli won't win. Women will see to that
Wasn't it women that were the most vocal about Mitt Romney and his ties to Bain Capital?

McAuliffe has spent most of his life in banking and as a venture capitalist, like Mitt Romney. His Federal City National Bank donated $125,000 to Richard Gephard's campaign while McAuliffe sat on the board, and also loaned money to Tony Coelho and Jim Wright. Wright was forced to resign from the House amid scandal concerning an aide's assault on Pamella Small, and also charges of ethics violations.

In the 1980's McAuliffe was entangled in the financial collapse of lawyer Richard Swan, who was in charge of fund raising for Jimmy Carter. McAuliffe used his political contacts to help Swan.

McAuliffe made millions off his investment in Global Crossing, when he sold his holdings just before they filed for bankruptcy the same month. Investors lost over $54 Billion, and 10,000 employees lost their jobs.

Currently, his Green Tech Automotive is under investigation by the SEC.

I guess you could ask, "What's not to like about McAuliffe?" He's your typical lying, cheating, Washington insider Democrat who always seems to be involved in scandal.

Is this the kind of man women like?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 04:35 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,315,673 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fancy-Schmancy View Post
Is there such a thing as a moderate Republican anymore?

This race was decided way back at the beginning when the GOP decided to skip their primary and nominated the candidates at a conference. Doing an end-run around your base never works.
Is there such a thing as an Honest Democrat? Not Terry McAuliffe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 04:38 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,315,673 times
Reputation: 8958
Default Honesty and integrity or dishonesty and scandal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
Poll: Virginia governor race a nail-biter - Tal Kopan - POLITICO.com

What looked like a 17% lead for McAuliffe is now a statistical tie. Here are the numbers:

45% McAuliffe
41% Cuccinelli
9% Sarvis (Libertarian)

The question at this point is who comprises the 9%? We know that this 9% won't hold on election day. So IMO, the winner of this election comes down to the composition of the 9% and who leaves the 9.

Also, a Roanoke College poll in the same article has McAuliffe up 15% over Cuccinelli; however, they have McAuliffe with 46% of the vote, similar to the Quinnipiac, but have more undecideds and thus, less share for Cuccinellli.
This race comes down to a contest between honesty and integrity, and a scandal ridden, dishonest Washington insider.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 05:52 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,469,142 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
Poll: Virginia governor race a nail-biter - Tal Kopan - POLITICO.com

What looked like a 17% lead for McAuliffe is now a statistical tie. Here are the numbers:

45% McAuliffe
41% Cuccinelli
9% Sarvis (Libertarian)

The question at this point is who comprises the 9%? We know that this 9% won't hold on election day. So IMO, the winner of this election comes down to the composition of the 9% and who leaves the 9.

Also, a Roanoke College poll in the same article has McAuliffe up 15% over Cuccinelli; however, they have McAuliffe with 46% of the vote, similar to the Quinnipiac, but have more undecideds and thus, less share for Cuccinellli.

If it's really gotten this close, the Libertarians will break 2-1 for Cuccinelli:

McAuliffe 47&
Cuccinelli 45%
Sarvis 3%

which means that the winner will be determined by the remaining 5% and how they break.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top