Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The reason Khan was there in the first place was as a counter point to Trumps calling for the end of Muslim immigration to the USA and his vilifying those Muslims already here in the USA.
Exactly, but that went over some peoples heads including Trump.
If Hillary is responsible for the war in Iraq, isn't the republican party even more responsible for that ware. After all they were in power. Trump is not just one man show (well it seem like he is) but he is part of a party that started the war. So his party is even more at blame
^^^ This!
Looks like people just don't read carefully, don't listen, or don't comprehend. Trump did not "attack" anyone.
So, this how it happens. Now you will be calling this an attack on your military relatives? Or, on ALL veterans??
It's the run-of-the-mill liberal that is dim-witted. You know, the ones that follow the MSM mantras and don't think for themselves.
Again, there was NO attack. And it was not about their son. Do liberals not get it, or choose to not get it?
There was no berating done. Those who keep repeating that should provide the proof. That "most Americans" (you know most?) or that "many Republicans" have disagreed carries no weight when those politicians who disagree are afraid to admit that he really said nothing wrong. They don't want to land on the wrong side of 'popular opinion' which itself is wrong.
The VFW leadership did not wake up a couple days ago and just make that statement for the fun of it. They were serious. You can be certain they are thinking for themselves. Feel free to disagree if you prefer, but they would not have done so if Trump had not crossed the line. Some people don't want to call a spade a spade when it does not fit their preconceived worldview.
Donald Trump has no one to blame but himself for this incident and for his standing in the polls (trails by 10% now).
Trump didn't attack her. He said exactly what others were thinking about why she said nothing too. I've even read a comment in this thread where someone was wondering why she didn't say anything also.
In the end, this thread is going to keep going around in circles.
Whether someone else was thinking it doesn't negate that Trump's comments were insulting. He intended to demean her by implying that her religious faith or culture compromised her ability to exercise her free speech.
How telling it is that these dim-wit liberals suddenly care about the military. I doubt 90% of liberals never even knew what a gold star family was until this farce. Hillary and Obama treat military officers and soldiers like their own personal servants. Their fake outrage over Capt Khan just shows the absolute disdain and disgust they have for the fine men and women serving in the armed forces
Do you agree or disagree with the statement made by the VFW? Or is that also "fake outrage" in your opinion?
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 17 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,544 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6029
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds
Yeah, I heard he reads the American Constitution, the joke is on you.
Anyone needing to use this many question marks and exclamation marks is not worthy of a response!
Regardless of how you feel about the number of question marks used in the response, the fact remains that they never blamed Trump for the death of their son. His response to Trump was strictly about they way he speaks about Mulsims in America as if they arent really americans.
Smoke and mirrors friend. They fail to see the connection and it's right in front of them. He is a proponent of Sharia so his little stunt with the Constitution was all lies.
And a stunt it was! It was discovered that the copy of the Constitution he held up was purchased for him just hours before he gave his speech, which had also been prepared for him hours earlier.
Please provide a NONPARTISAN source link to factually back your claim that Mr. Khan is an advocate for Sharia in America.
Good luck in finding that..
And if you don't find it, please plan to return here & state that you were misinformed & thus wrong in your accusation.
Then I may rep you for accountability which I admire when people admit their error.
To paraphrase the quote from the old Dragnet show, just the facts please...
“All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.” - Khizr Khan
Will you accept his own words?
Last edited by nononsenseguy; 08-04-2016 at 12:31 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
SMH