Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2016, 02:40 PM
 
19,669 posts, read 12,260,591 times
Reputation: 26481

Advertisements

The rapist requested a female lawyer to defend him so for some reason a prosecutor recommended Clinton. WHY does the rapist get any say in WHO is assigned to his case and why would a prosecutor get involved?.... Hillary supposedly did not want the case but it was too late and she was assigned to it. This all seems to favor the rapist from the beginning by giving him a woman lawyer because he wanted one.

Clinton was young but known as smart, was a big cheese at Legal Aid and was a good get for the rapist. It seems a conflict of interest for a prosecutor to suggest anyone, much less someone likely to win against the state.

Hillary taught criminal law, she knew what she was doing, and if she was in a position to be assigned cases as a defense lawyer, this is what you can get. But she should not have been pushed into the case the way it happened.

 
Old 08-10-2016, 02:42 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,913,446 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
The rapist requested a female lawyer to defend him so for some reason a prosecutor recommended Clinton. WHY does the rapist get any say in WHO is assigned to his case and why would a prosecutor get involved?.... Hillary supposedly did not want the case but it was too late and she was assigned to it. This all seems to favor the rapist from the beginning by giving him a woman lawyer because he wanted one.

Clinton was young but known as smart, was a big cheese at Legal Aid and was a good get for the rapist. It seems a conflict of interest for a prosecutor to suggest anyone, much less someone likely to win against the state.

Hillary taught criminal law, she knew what she was doing, and if she was in a position to be assigned cases as a defense lawyer, this is what you can get. But she should not have been pushed into the case the way it happened.
There were only two practicing female attorneys in the district at the time.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 02:44 PM
 
19,669 posts, read 12,260,591 times
Reputation: 26481
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
There were only two practicing female attorneys in the district at the time.
What does that have to do with anything?
 
Old 08-10-2016, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,422,020 times
Reputation: 73937
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneyard1962 View Post
Im sure that you meant the prosecuting attorney. That said Hillary did her best to tar and feather the victim...
So much for all victims deserve to be believed. That is unless Hillary is the perps lawyer or it's her husband who is being accused.
Lawyers, all laywers, play the blame the victim and make them look sleazy game when it comes to rape.
ALL lawyers.

So you want to ban all lawyers from politics?

Ok. I'm totally on board with that.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 02:50 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,913,446 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
What does that have to do with anything?
The defendant requested a female lawyer. There were only two female lawyers in Washington County in 1975. If the prosecutor and judge wanted to comply with the request, then the choice of defense lawyers was limited to one of two attorneys.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 03:01 PM
 
19,669 posts, read 12,260,591 times
Reputation: 26481
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
The defendant requested a female lawyer. There were only two female lawyers in Washington County in 1975. If the prosecutor and judge wanted to comply with the request, then the choice of defense lawyers was limited to one of two attorneys.

The question was why does the rapist get to be choosy and be accommodated regarding assigned lawyers he isn't even paying for? Does the victim get to choose the prosecuting attorney?


If this was to be accommodated there would be no need for a prosecutor to suggest Hillary, either one could be assigned. I don't trust the whole thing, it smells of politics and back door dealings. A prosecutor should not be suggesting the defense attorney unless the defense attorney was a bumbling fool sure to lose the case.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 03:12 PM
 
14,415 posts, read 14,337,086 times
Reputation: 45774
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse View Post
Clinton VOLUNTEERED to take the case. LAUGHED about his getting off.



We all know that Hillary believes it is the fault of a woman if she is raped and in this case a child. Hillary volunteered to take the case to get a man off for raping a child. Says everything many need to know about her. Sociopath - "without a conscience".



Hillary chose to take the case and laughed about getting the man off. See most of us don't think it is funny for someone to break the law and get away with it especially when it involves a child.



Yes, she did. A child. Laughing while being interviewed about it. We know that she blames females when they are raped which makes her a perfect match for being the one to help sharia law move forward. She'll be able to see Bill's rape victims stoned to death and stand, well she can't stand, but be held up laughing while it is happening. This case shows just how sick Hillary was even when she was younger.





She still volunteered to represent a child rapist. Who volunteers to do that, gets them off and laughs about it? What sort of evil exists in a person like that?

I wonder how many Hillarybots actually listened to her laughing on the audio tape? I would say that what her supporters lack is empathy for the Clinton's victims of which there are many from the Clinton death list to the others that lost their lives at the incompetence of Hillary.
A person is innocent until proven guilty. Until that happens, she is not representing a child rapist. Your reply and a few others proves three things to me:

1. Many people are profoundly ignorant of the importance of the criminal defense lawyer in maintaining individual liberties and freedoms in this country. Criminal defense lawyers are bad news--until you need one because you have been falsely accused of a crime. Than suddenly, they are a godsend.

2. When you say something, certain people will hear a completely different message than the one you sent.

3. Any rumor or innuendo that can be used by certain groups to make Hillary Clinton look bad will be used regardless of its truth or authenticity.
 
Old 08-10-2016, 03:22 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,913,446 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
The question was why does the rapist get to be choosy and be accommodated regarding assigned lawyers he isn't even paying for? Does the victim get to choose the prosecuting attorney?


If this was to be accommodated there would be no need for a prosecutor to suggest Hillary, either one could be assigned. I don't trust the whole thing, it smells of politics and back door dealings. A prosecutor should not be suggesting the defense attorney unless the defense attorney was a bumbling fool sure to lose the case.
This was small-town America. Think To Kill a Mockingbird. The legal system was an old-boys-network. A defendant asks a judge for a female lawyer. The judge is wondering, "What female lawyers even work here?" The defense attorney says there's a new attorney married to an instructor at the University, she's working to put together a legal aid office, and the judge says, "Hah! That'll work."
 
Old 08-10-2016, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Southeast, where else?
3,913 posts, read 5,235,232 times
Reputation: 5824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroWord View Post
I could have sworn the constitution specifically said everyone deserves legal representation to defend him/herself? Even the most vile human beings on earth deserve a chance to defend themselves. This is the core of our democracy.

Clinton was doing her job at the time. Why blame her for misplaced evidence?

Are you guys actually suggesting anyone who's a suspect of a horrific crime does not deserve legal representation?
I'm sure you on the left would treat Trump equally and call it him, just doing his job, had he pulled the same stunt. She got a rapist off with about a year in prison and plea'd the rape down to "improper fondling".

Really? Since when does a 40 something year old push his penis into a 12 year old and come out with only a "improper fondling" charge? It doesn't negate his guilt, only gets him off on a technicality. You know, the kind Hillary uses when she says things like "that I can recall"....."short circuited"....spinspeak for you got me now I got to pivot and avoid the truth.

SHE defended a rapist and got him off easy, so much for "the woman's choice".....hey, if you want her to protect your daughters Moms of America, vote for Hillary. Who knows? Maybe when YOUR 12 year old kid gets raped by a grown man, her cronies can get it plea'd out for a lesser charge and set him free in about a year.

You okay with that? Crickets......
 
Old 08-10-2016, 03:52 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,245,171 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Actually a lawyer's job precludes lying to the court.

Comment on Rule 3.3 | The Center for Professional Responsibility

So a lawyer is NOT allowed to slander a 12 year old rape victim with no evidence, which is what Hillary did. And it subjected the 12 year old who was raped into a coma to repeated false attacks from this narrative and getting grilled by a psychiatrist. Hillary is one stone cold witch to lie about a 12 year old that was raped into a coma so bad that she could never have kids and was brutally beaten in the process.
Okay. Prosecute Hillary for perjury then.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top