Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mmmm, yes. Yes, she lost & I suppose people can say she's a poor loser for talking about it. You know what's worse than a poor loser? A poor winner, like the orange turd you've got in the white house.
You just committed one of the worst of logical fallacies. Here is your flow of "logic": Hillary is a woman who ran for office. Women always lose elections. Therefore Hillary lost the election because she is a woman.
Do you not see the flaw with one (actually two) of your assumptions?
If not, let me help you out a little bit: current numbers of women in government, federal executive, 7, US supreme court, 3, US senate, 21, US house, 83, statewide executive, 75, state legislature, 1840, state senate, 442, state house/assembly, 1398, mayors, 312. (source: Rutgers)
She lost because her, and her husband are some of the most corrupt politicians in US history. The FBI refusing to proscute her was the last straw, the corruption was too much.
And yet she won 3 million more votes than Trump. What does that say about Trump's ability to connect with voters?
Let's put this bullcrap to rest:
1) 100% of her popular vote margin came from deep blue California
2) Her margin of victory in California far exceeded her average margin of victory in other blue states she won.
3) Had she maintained her average margin of victory (12.5%) in California (30%), she would not have even come close to winning the popular vote.
In other words, had the popular vote - which is 100% irrelevant anyway - decreased by even 2% across the 16 other states she won, her California popular vote margin would have still left her with losing the national popular vote as well as the Electoral College.
She quite literally won the popular vote ONLY because California has so many Democrats concentrated in one area. Not because she was more popular. Do you understand?
She lost because her, and her husband are some of the most corrupt politicians in US history. The FBI refusing to proscute her was the last straw, the corruption was too much.
She lost because hillbilly rednecks thought it was a good idea to vote for a good ol' white boy (no matter how stupid). Sorry this country is a mess!!
Of course conservatives will cry and have someone remove my comments, go ahead, we will remember next election when the ultra left dems take everything back!
She lost because hillbilly rednecks thought it was a good idea to vote for a good ol' white boy (no matter how stupid). Sorry this country is a mess!!
Yes, it is a mess--quite literally because of folks with the sentiments you display here. Nothing much good ever comes from hate. And for you to dismiss "hillbilly rednecks" and look down your nose at these alleged "hillbilly rednecks," just as Hillary did, is a good way for you guys to keep losing elections. So please keep dismissing and calling stupid anyone who doesn't agree with you. Please keep your venom on display. It's the best way for your side to keep losing elections. Because reasonable people are not attracted to hate and viciousness (on either side).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
