Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-23-2008, 01:27 PM
 
2,137 posts, read 3,860,163 times
Reputation: 608

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
And your post contributed soooooo much!

Thank you for your really stupid analysis!


Democrats in office are better for the woman's movement than the Repressed Repugs!

Fun fact:

Barry pays women on his campaign staff less than what the men make.

McCain pays the women on his staff more than the men make.

PAY EQUALITY: IT'S A DEM THANG!

Another case of Liberal "feelings" over facts... always funny, usually wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2008, 10:12 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,391,475 times
Reputation: 18436
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDubsMom View Post
I am a registered Independent and a black woman. Because of his OBL and amnesty positions, I will not vote for Obama. That being said:

Obama like every other nominee that has run for the office of POTUS has a right to choose the person that he feels is more suited for the job and he would be most comfortable with as his VP.

Both Hillary and Bill have insulted Obama at every turn on both a personal and professional level. The fact that she implied he could possibly be asassinated ala Bobby Kennedy style (like many of the Clinton's former now mysteriously dead associates) along with being forced to endure 4 years of Bill living out his 3rd term, is a more than adequate reason for not choosing Hillary as his running mate.

I think these whiny (primarily white women) need to grow up and get over it. Hillary lost. The fact that she is a woman and Obama rejected her is not an adequate reason to whine like 3 year olds. They are collective representatives of all that is wrong with the giant set of testicles known as Hillary Clinton.
Excellent post! I could not have said it better myself. You sound like one of the enlightened and an Obama supporter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 10:14 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,391,475 times
Reputation: 18436
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
Some of these women just make me want to scream with their stupidity. I expect low class white males to be stupid and vote against themselves. They are very good at that. But women, you would think, would have the intelligence not to vote against themselves and their kids. A vote for McCain and the Republicans IS a vote against women and children. There is simply no other way to cut it. McCain is a womanizer, an adulterer and opposes abortion rights, women's rights, opposed the ERA, lied and cheated on his old wife, called his new wife names in public, opposes children's healthcare, opposes anything else for children.
So women have a choice to make and they had best choose wisely between President Obama who is 100% with them and Johnny Mac who is 100% against them.
Excellent post!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 10:36 PM
LML
 
Location: Wisconsin
7,100 posts, read 9,113,256 times
Reputation: 5191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elmonellie View Post
Fun fact:

Barry pays women on his campaign staff less than what the men make.

McCain pays the women on his staff more than the men make.

.
Please post a link that proves this. Saying it doesn't make it so. Just because some blogger makes something up and posts it doesn't make it true. Prove what you say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2008, 10:45 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,473,584 times
Reputation: 4799
Threads like this explain the "divide and conquer" quote perfectly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 12:05 AM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 19,005,607 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elmonellie View Post
Fun fact:

Barry pays women on his campaign staff less than what the men make.

McCain pays the women on his staff more than the men make.

PAY EQUALITY: IT'S A DEM THANG!

Another case of Liberal "feelings" over facts... always funny, usually wrong.

where's your proof? do you have access to their salary info?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 12:07 AM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,441,267 times
Reputation: 55562
not a setback for women if this war stops. going broke is not good for women or kids. wars cost money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 03:10 AM
 
Location: Assisi, Italy
1,845 posts, read 4,229,645 times
Reputation: 354
It just goes to show that it really takes men to fix things. Women should just stay home and make sandwiches, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 04:37 AM
 
Location: San Antonio
7,629 posts, read 16,458,823 times
Reputation: 18770
Quote:
Originally Posted by pirate girl View Post
It was stated in a news article this morning that Hilary did not need to be vetted because her financials and credentials were already gone over with a fine tooth comb when she was a presidential candidate.

The article also quoted an unnamed source as saying that Hilary declined consideration because she did not want the Bill Clinton Foundation's finances scruitinized due to the sources of some of the monies.
Does that really fly??? Would not those same fianaces have been scruitinized due to her run for President had she been the Dem's choice???

Kinda like saying I would not have gone to the dance with him EVEN if he asked me to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2008, 05:24 AM
 
3,566 posts, read 3,734,425 times
Reputation: 1364
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
As a woman in her early 50s who lived through the height of the women's lib movement, and so on, I would have loved to have had a female candidate worthy of being president. I always admired Sen. Clinton, although more during Pres. Clinton's first presidential campaign than now. I thought she was smart, accomplished and that she set a wonderful model for her daughter and mine.

The 'deal-breaker' for me was her vote for the Iraq 'conflict' - I knew in my heart that it was wrong then and nothing that has transpired since has changed my mind.
If anything Biden was a more ardent supporter of the Ira war than was Hillary. If her support of the war was a deal breaker for you you must have serious problems with Biden?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top