Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-22-2008, 10:52 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,985,890 times
Reputation: 4555

Advertisements

Again from your own link. Another example refuting what you claim

Total taxation in Sweden, including local taxes, is equal to 59.2 percent of that country's economy, the highest level in the 27-member Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. In contrast, the U.S. total tax burden is 30.6 percent, lowest among the OECD members. Yet unemployment for the past two years in Sweden has been considerably lower than U.S. levels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-22-2008, 10:58 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,985,890 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCN View Post
Those rich people will just take their money and leave the country. When a person is rich, they have that option.

Would it be too much to ask for you back up your B.S with a source?

That Obama's plan to tax the rich will cause them to leave in significant numbers??

I mean really? Stop being lazy and ignorant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 04:55 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,143,658 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
More from your own link. ( Remind me to come to you whenever I need a source to embarass you)

some prominent conservative economists, including Harvard University's Martin S. Feldstein, predicted wrongly that the Clinton tax cuts would choke off the 1990s recovery and kill jobs, while the millions of new jobs that Bush said his $1.7 trillion in tax cuts would generate have not materialized.
I sure did, you asked for an OBJECTIVE link, I provided, you ignored.

"The bottom line is, cuts in taxes lead to economic growth, which leads to improvements in the labor market to levels that are better than they otherwise would have been," said Mark J. Warshawsky, acting assistant Treasury secretary for economic policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 04:57 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,143,658 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Again from your own link. Another example refuting what you claim

Total taxation in Sweden, including local taxes, is equal to 59.2 percent of that country's economy, the highest level in the 27-member Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. In contrast, the U.S. total tax burden is 30.6 percent, lowest among the OECD members. Yet unemployment for the past two years in Sweden has been considerably lower than U.S. levels.
I dont live in Sweden, thanks for trying..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 05:07 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,921,177 times
Reputation: 4459
here is a fact:

The Reagan tax cuts were followed by America's longest peacetime economic expansion in history up to that point, which led to the creation of over 20 million jobs. The unemployment rate was virtually halved between the peak of the 1982 recession and when Reagan left office in 1989.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 06:20 AM
 
1,652 posts, read 2,551,138 times
Reputation: 1463
Any small business that is paying their full percentage of taxes is either ignorant or has a really, really bad accountant. Most small businesses show a net loss on taxes each year after salaries and business reinvestment.

A CPA firm should be better at legally sheltering their profits.

Even Warren Buffett says he pays a lower tax rate then his secretary.
YouTube - Tom Brokaw interviews Warren Buffett
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 06:27 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,811,485 times
Reputation: 24863
The rich would remain rich but would not have enough money left over to gamble on Derivitices etc. the result woulf be a much more stable economy and a financial system biased toward equities not speculation.

INHO - this would be a "good thing"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Louisiana
1,768 posts, read 3,414,755 times
Reputation: 604
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Again the thread starter doesn't understand.

Obama is talking about an incremental increase in the rates.

It will not tax rich people out of existence....that's absurd.
Understood... you don't want to be killing the goose that lays the golden egg, now do you?

Let's just tax them to the point that they cannot grow their wealth, and sufficient to support a couple million people who do not want to work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 06:55 AM
 
1,862 posts, read 3,344,103 times
Reputation: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by WinterinAmerica View Post
There has never been a shortage of rich people, regardless of tax rate. In the pre-Bush tax period more godzillionaires were created in the history of the country. Anyway, as I have posted already, a family making $280,000 pays a grand total of $257 more under the Obama tax plan than McCains.
Gosh, that's tough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Louisiana
1,768 posts, read 3,414,755 times
Reputation: 604
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
here is a fact:

The Reagan tax cuts were followed by America's longest peacetime economic expansion in history up to that point, which led to the creation of over 20 million jobs. The unemployment rate was virtually halved between the peak of the 1982 recession and when Reagan left office in 1989.

Hey, don't you go be confusin' these dumbocrats with facts! Billy Boy also has a lot to thank Reagan for the good economic times during the first 6 years of his term. And lots of smarter people know that Klinton turned the beginnings of a recession over to Bush. Don't believe me? Click on my pitcher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top