Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2015, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Rockville, MD
929 posts, read 1,902,079 times
Reputation: 554

Advertisements

So NYC clearly has the Urban scale of the largest two European metros, Paris and London; but I'm wondering that is there any metro in the US (and perhaps Canada) that has the urban scale of Madrid or Berlin...i.e. just as many square miles (preferably contiguous of walkable/transport-friendly areas with mixed uses development); I'd imagine that Chicago,Toronto,San Francisco and Montreal might be in the discussion, but I'd still imagine that none of these cities have as much contiguous area that's walkable,transport-friendly and mixed-use.

Based on what I've experienced, though NYC can certainly match and surpass any large European city on urban scale/contigous density/pedestrian-friendliness, I'd imagine it'd be tough for any other US/Canadian city to match the urban scale of large European cities (e.g. Berlin, Madrid, Barcelona, Rome, Milan); of course we're excluding the European megacities Paris and London in this comparison.

Would love for anyone else who's visited/lived in large European and American/Canadian cities to chime in!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2015, 07:55 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,329,498 times
Reputation: 10644
I would say Mexico City, probably. Yeah, it's sprawly but there's still a very big, walkable core.

Chicago, Toronto, SF, Philly, Boston, DC, and Montreal are not THAT far behind, but I would still put them a bit behind Madrid and Berlin.

I would also put Madrid a tiny bit ahead of Berlin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 08:52 PM
 
Location: Rockville, MD
929 posts, read 1,902,079 times
Reputation: 554
Quote:
I would say Mexico City, probably. Yeah, it's sprawly but there's still a very big, walkable core.

Chicago, Toronto, SF, Philly, Boston, DC, and Montreal are not THAT far behind, but I would still put them a bit behind Madrid and Berlin.

I would also put Madrid a tiny bit ahead of Berlin.
I figure that's a fair comparison. How does Mexico City's scope of walkable areas compare to NYC's? I think another poster posted a density distribution of NYC Boroughs and it showed that even in Queens >30% of the population lived at densities of >62,000 ppsm, and that's certainly believable when you look at the walkability of many Queens neighborhoods...so NYC is pretty walkable throughout- even more than 10 miles away from midtown...how does Mexico City compare in that regard?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 08:58 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
233 posts, read 333,900 times
Reputation: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballniket View Post
I figure that's a fair comparison. How does Mexico City's scope of walkable areas compare to NYC's? I think another poster posted a density distribution of NYC Boroughs and it showed that even in Queens >30% of the population lived at densities of >62,000 ppsm, and that's certainly believable when you look at the walkability of many Queens neighborhoods...so NYC is pretty walkable throughout- even more than 10 miles away from midtown...how does Mexico City compare in that regard?
https://lsecities.net/media/objects/...ompared/en-gb/
From this graphic, it looks while like Mexico City doesn't have peak densities to match NYC, it does cover a huge area at consistently high densities
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Rockville, MD
929 posts, read 1,902,079 times
Reputation: 554
Quote:
https://lsecities.net/media/objects/...ompared/en-gb/
From this graphic, it looks while like Mexico City doesn't have peak densities to match NYC, it does cover a huge area at consistently high densities
Wow! Thanks so much for the link! Some really great visuals there.. It's peak doesn't too TOO far off NYC's and it does continue out quite far. I'm interested more in the streetscape though- does the streetscape and transportation infrastructure around 8-12 miles from the CBD lends itself to walking/being about at all hours of the night to the extent of the inner/middle parts of NYC's outer boroughs (excluding Staten Island)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 11:59 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,329,498 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballniket View Post
Wow! Thanks so much for the link! Some really great visuals there.. It's peak doesn't too TOO far off NYC's and it does continue out quite far. I'm interested more in the streetscape though- does the streetscape and transportation infrastructure around 8-12 miles from the CBD lends itself to walking/being about at all hours of the night to the extent of the inner/middle parts of NYC's outer boroughs (excluding Staten Island)?
I would say no. Mexico City is dense, and consistently urban, but not very pedestrian friendly outside the core. It's a huge, dense city, like a NYC or Sao Paulo, but more like a Madrid-sized urban core, and then just a mess of highways/slums/middle-upper class areas.

It's kind of a denser, multinodal LA-type city, so the core is small relative to overall city size. And even the core is kind of auto-oriented and pedestrian hostile, except for the oldest part (the historical center).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 06:30 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,352 posts, read 17,015,156 times
Reputation: 12406
I'd say Philly comes the closest to a mid-density European city overall in terms of sheer size, dense development, and mixed-use status. Admittedly it's marred by blight in North and West Philadelphia in ways no European city is. But it's one of the few American cities which only has a handful of detached single-family housing neighborhoods. It probably has less of them (adjusting for city size) than NYC even.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:18 AM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,337,794 times
Reputation: 6225
Madrid completely stole my heart and I've never loved anything in my life as much as that city. I've been searching for anything even close and nothing. No luck. I haven't made my way to Montreal yet. But if it means anything, my favorite American city is Chicago and my favorite global city is Madrid. So maybe they're similar enough? Not sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,926,582 times
Reputation: 8365
^Barcelona looks even more beautiful to me, but I've always wanted to see both cities for sure!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:36 AM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,337,794 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
^Barcelona looks even more beautiful to me, but I've always wanted to see both cities for sure!
I studied abroad in Madrid. Yes, actually studied. I speak Spanish fluently and befriended many Madrilenos. I went to strictly Spanish-speaking establishments and hung out where Madrilenos do. I avoided the tourist spots and truly immersed myself in the culture. I tried to do so in Barcelona too. But Barcelona is a more superficial beautiful. People and tourists fall in love easy because it is beautiful. However, for a living city, Madrid is more appealing to most. It doesn't have the beauty that attracts tourists to it. There's a few tourists locations, but not the whole city like Barcelona. But once you truly meet Madrid and its people, there's no pulling you away. It's been over 2 years and every single day I wish I was back. The Metro system is extremely modern and the cleanest I've ever ridden. Extremely friendly and outgoing people. Extremely accepting and liberal. And there is NOTHING like Madrid street life that I've ever experienced. At any time of day the streets are full of people. Wednesday at 10pm will be like most cities peak pedestrian traffic hour. And on a weekend night as the Madrilenos have "la marcha" while they "botellon" in the streets, I've never seen a city so alive and I've been to 19 countries. Only cities that come close are Barcelona and Tel Aviv.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top