Hopefully, this can shed a bit more light on the constantly contentious CSA-boundaries arguments that crop up here. For instance, this map has a more expansive definition of Northeast Ohio's sphere of influence than the Census Bureau's CSA boundary, but it appears to line up pretty closely with the Washington-Baltimore CSA boundaries.
Quote:
Originally Posted by _OT
Commuter map right? people commute from Tallahassee all the way to Birmingham?
|
If some people who live near A work near B, and some people who live near B work near C (A <-> B <-> C), then yes, A and C can end up in the same "megaregion." Within the economic network of places, they have stronger ties.
This in no way implies that millions of people drive from A to C every day, or that those cities are identical in every way, or that A "deeply influences" C, or that city A has been rooting for the wrong sports team, or that city C has nothing in common with city D. It's just a measure of economic ties.
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoopygirlmi
If we are basing it on commuting patterns, Detroit would be its own thing - separate from the rest of Michigan.
|
And what you've described is exactly the situation that I've described. Some people around Lansing commute east towards Ann Arbor, some people commute west towards Battle Creek or Grand Rapids. That intertwines all of those various areas of Michigan...
not as a "Detroit" thing.
And FWIW, I know at least one person who commutes to Williamsburg, Va. from Richmond. Not every day, but does.