Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which metros could Atlanta overtake?
Washington D.C. (pop. 5.3 million) 99 46.92%
Miami (pop. 5.4 million) 121 57.35%
Houston (pop. 5.6 million) 48 22.75%
Philadelphia (pop. 5.8 million) 88 41.71%
Dallas/Ft. Worth (pop. 6.1 million) 26 12.32%
Chicago (pop. 9.5 million) 8 3.79%
Los Angeles (pop. 12.8 million) 5 2.37%
New York City (pop. 18.8 million) 7 3.32%
None of the above 50 23.70%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-19-2009, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
2,848 posts, read 6,438,593 times
Reputation: 1743

Advertisements

Breaking news: Fulton county (Atlanta's the seat of) has passed the 1 million population mark.

Census: Despite economy, Fulton population swells | ajc.com (http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2009/03/19/georgia_census_growth.html?cxntlid=homepage_tab_ne wstab - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-04-2009, 04:31 PM
 
12 posts, read 21,557 times
Reputation: 11
Your right.Depends on who is giving the facts.Atlanta city actually only has a few more people than Birmingham,Al.....and what they call "metro Atlanta" is silly....take the metro area of DC,Houston,Dallas,Miami,etc. and extend it as far as Atlanta claims,and..well Atlanta has a long way to go all things being equal..plus there`s nothing to do there except work.It`s cold in the winter.95 in the summer.200+ miles from the beach.1 decent lake,and 2 tiny lakes that are overcrowded,and dry lately...traffic that would make even a Floridian cringe......but for some it`s heaven.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:00 PM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,810,197 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by luvdaweather View Post
Your right.Depends on who is giving the facts.Atlanta city actually only has a few more people than Birmingham,Al.....and what they call "metro Atlanta" is silly....take the metro area of DC,Houston,Dallas,Miami,etc. and extend it as far as Atlanta claims,and..well Atlanta has a long way to go all things being equal..plus there`s nothing to do there except work.It`s cold in the winter.95 in the summer.200+ miles from the beach.1 decent lake,and 2 tiny lakes that are overcrowded,and dry lately...traffic that would make even a Floridian cringe......but for some it`s heaven.
Somebody has some jealousy issues. A few facts, in response to the above assertions:

1. Atlanta's population is not "a few more people than Birmingham".
Birmingham population - 230,000
Atlanta population - 537,000

2. Atlanta doesn't "claim" any particular area in its MSA...as most people know, the Census Bureau determines the boundaries of metro areas. Additionally, Metro Atlanta (8,376 sq mi) isn't any larger than and somewhere in the middle of those listed above...

Houston - 10,062 sq mi
Dallas - 9,286 sq mi
Washington D.C. - 8,000+ sq mi
Miami - 6,137 sq mi

3. The lakes aren't below level anymore...you'll have to find something else wrong with Atlanta to bad-mouth, that one is old and won't work anymore. The drought is over. Atlanta's "tiny" lakes - Lake Lanier (37,000 acres) and Lake Allatoona (12,000 acres).

4. 200 miles is MUCH closer than the majority of the U.S. to beaches.

5. As anyone who lives in a large city understands, there is much more to do in Atlanta than "work".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,215,611 times
Reputation: 7428
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconJ View Post
A few facts, in response to the above assertions:

1. Atlanta's population is not "a few more people than Birmingham".
Birmingham population - 230,000
Atlanta population - 537,000

2. Atlanta doesn't "claim" any particular area in its MSA...as most people know, the Census Bureau determines the boundaries of metro areas. Additionally, Metro Atlanta (8,376 sq mi) isn't any larger than and somewhere in the middle of those listed above...

Houston - 10,062 sq mi
Dallas - 9,286 sq mi
Washington D.C. - 8,000+ sq mi
Miami - 6,137 sq mi

3. The lakes aren't below level anymore...you'll have to find something else wrong with Atlanta to bad-mouth, that one is old and won't work anymore. The drought is over.

4. 200 miles is MUCH closer than the majority of the U.S. to beaches.

5. As anyone who lives in a large city understands, there is much more to do in Atlanta than "work".
Now how much of that land is developed?? Atlanta's developement is very spread out when compared to cities like Dallas, Houston, and Miami.

Also lots of Houston's land can't be built on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Midwest
1,004 posts, read 2,772,232 times
Reputation: 253
I always question why has Atlanta population grown/ is , since as I observe the city I don't find anything attracting about it as many sunbelt cities. I would have thought St. Louis doing better than Atlanta. I will take another look at it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,544,005 times
Reputation: 12157
Quote:
Originally Posted by jluke65780 View Post
Now how much of that land is developed?? Atlanta's developement is very spread out when compared to cities like Dallas, Houston, and Miami.

Also lots of Houston's land can't be built on.
I was going to ask the same thing. Many parts of Harris County have yet to be developed or cannot be developed on. Other counties in the Houston area are in the same situation. I think Houston is slightly more compact than Atlanta. Could be wrong. But there isn't really much a difference. I have to look it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by timeofseasons View Post
I always question why has Atlanta population grown/ is , since as I observe the city I don't find anything attracting about it as many sunbelt cities. I would have thought St. Louis doing better than Atlanta. I will take another look at it.
Job creation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:32 PM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,810,197 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by jluke65780 View Post
Now how much of that land is developed?? Atlanta's developement is very spread out when compared to cities like Dallas, Houston, and Miami.

Also lots of Houston's land can't be built on.
What do you mean? The MSA isn't determined by developed land...it's determined by social and economic ties to the core city and commuting and employment patterns.

Atlanta isn't anymore "spread out" than Dallas, Houston, or Miami: Houston MSA density is 630/sq mi. Dallas MSA is 634/sq mi. Miami MSA is 890/sq mi. Atlanta MSA is 630/sq mi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:33 PM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,810,197 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by timeofseasons View Post
I always question why has Atlanta population grown/ is , since as I observe the city I don't find anything attracting about it as many sunbelt cities. I would have thought St. Louis doing better than Atlanta. I will take another look at it.
WHAT?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:36 PM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,810,197 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
I was going to ask the same thing. Many parts of Harris County have yet to be developed or cannot be developed on. Other counties in the Houston area are in the same situation. I think Houston is slightly more compact than Atlanta. Could be wrong. But there isn't really much a difference. I have to look it up.
Houston, at 10,062 square miles and a population density of 630/sq mi, certainly isn't anymore compact than Atlanta. It doesn't really matter how many areas are undeveloped - if they are included in the Houston Metro area then they are part of the Houston Metro area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top