Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-25-2019, 11:59 AM
 
2,669 posts, read 2,091,516 times
Reputation: 3690

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlarnla View Post
Property tax is not a wealth tax. There are plenty of low and middle income families that are paying property tax.

Personally, I think property tax should be limited to only property that is excessive. So don't tax a person's home or the land needed for their farm or business, but do tax any surplus property they have. This is in line with Benjamin Franklin's views:

"All the Property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other Laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. "


Property: Benjamin Franklin to Robert Morris
Then we would have to abolish public schools since they are mostly financed from property taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-25-2019, 12:06 PM
 
2,669 posts, read 2,091,516 times
Reputation: 3690
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
Most of those billions haven't been "earned" yet. They are stock options. When Bezos sells off $50 million in stock to build a mansion, he pays taxes on it.

Well yes and he probably pays 15 or 20% on those earnings. While middle class has an effective tax rate of 30% or so. This needs to be changed so that billionaires at least pay the same or slightly larger effective tax rates than middle class.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
You are never going to become rich by taking from those already rich. Get over it not gonna happen.
Who is talking about being rich? We are talking about meeting all Government obligations without running unsustainable deficits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2019, 12:10 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,960,195 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by karpo1 View Post
In general, government should spend less rather than trying to tax more.
You want government to spend less than the typical $500 a month that people who are born disabled get?

I think most sane people think government should spend far MORE than $500-$700 a month on people who had bad luck and cant work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2019, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,345,962 times
Reputation: 21891
Quote:
Originally Posted by DefiantNJ View Post
Well yes and he probably pays 15 or 20% on those earnings. While middle class has an effective tax rate of 30% or so. This needs to be changed so that billionaires at least pay the same or slightly larger effective tax rates than middle class.


Who is talking about being rich? We are talking about meeting all Government obligations without running unsustainable deficits.
If you want to meet your obligations you make cuts. The Government has so so much to cut.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2019, 01:32 PM
 
2,669 posts, read 2,091,516 times
Reputation: 3690
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
If you want to meet your obligations you make cuts. The Government has so so much to cut.
Yes, I agree. This what I would cut as a first priority:

1) Defense & other anti terrorist operations. Cut by 40%. More Americans die from driving accidents & gun accidents than from terrorism.

2) Cut corporate welfare:
a) Increase effective corporate tax rate from 1 - 5% to at least 25% or so. Forbid companies from hiding
profits abroad.

b) Stop the government from paying ridiculous amounts for medicines and medical scanning and other procedures. Cut corporate welfare to pharmaceutical and devices companies.

3) Cut welfare for the rich. Instead of figuring out which taxes to increase or which loophole to close, I would just make a minimum mandatory effective tax rate. This will apply to anyone making $500,000 of pre tax income from any source. No income source should be exempt from taxation. This will ensure that rich pay similar tax rate as middle class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2019, 01:42 PM
 
10,609 posts, read 5,647,123 times
Reputation: 18905
Q: Why would anyone be against a 2% wealth tax over $50 million?

A: Why would anyone be in favor of it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2019, 01:46 PM
 
10,609 posts, read 5,647,123 times
Reputation: 18905
Quote:
Originally Posted by latunafish View Post
Following up on the above post, the high income /assets people that I have been acquainted with, know the loopholes and use them. This includes moving assets out of the city, county, state and/or country, if need be.
Please name 5 loopholes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2019, 01:47 PM
 
Location: Maryland
2,269 posts, read 1,639,050 times
Reputation: 5200
I am probably more against it than for it for the simple reason that the stupid government is already too damn big. It was too big decades ago. No amount of money would ever be enough. They bring in ridiculous amounts of dollars now and are 20+ trillion dollars in debt. They spend without restraint. If, and when, the interest rates go back up, that buzzard is coming home to roost with a vengeance. We don’t need to send more money to the government. They need to demonstrate some ability to reasonably manage they money they bring in now. It’s absurd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2019, 01:48 PM
 
10,609 posts, read 5,647,123 times
Reputation: 18905
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlarnla View Post
Property tax is not a wealth tax.
Of course it is. All economists agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlarnla View Post
There are plenty of low and middle income families that are paying property tax.
I think I've missed your point. Why did you bring this up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2019, 01:54 PM
 
2,557 posts, read 2,681,266 times
Reputation: 1860
Taxing super wealthy is not as easy as taxing them a higher percentage. Many wealthy can easily pay less tax abroad basically by changing their citizenship. That has to be considered too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top