Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Senate parliamentarian has dealt a new blow to congressional Republicans' Obamacare repeal campaign, ruling that the GOP can use a special procedure to advance repeal legislation with 50 votes only until the end of September.
"It was not just rhetoric. Trump tweeted a quote from the New York Times in April noting the problem. The Kaiser Family Foundation created an animation showing counties without providers over the course of the year; in the spring, as the debate raged, entire states lacked an insurer."
So right this minute, looks like maybe everyone has a choice of at least 1 provider. Will it still be true during open enrollment? Who knows. Maybe we should be praising Trump for getting insurers back on the exchange everywhere??
"It was not just rhetoric. Trump tweeted a quote from the New York Times in April noting the problem. The Kaiser Family Foundation created an animation showing counties without providers over the course of the year; in the spring, as the debate raged, entire states lacked an insurer."
So right this minute, looks like maybe everyone has a choice of at least 1 provider. Will it still be true during open enrollment? Who knows. Maybe we should be praising Trump for getting insurers back on the exchange everywhere??
that's not my article. I just thought it fit the discussion. I don't know who to praise.
The Senate parliamentarian has dealt a new blow to congressional Republicans' Obamacare repeal campaign, ruling that the GOP can use a special procedure to advance repeal legislation with 50 votes only until the end of September.
All of those repeal votes, including the House bill were "pretend" votes since the legislators in question had no intention of following through. I actually think we would be better off without any health insurance (link) except catastrophic coverage and maybe coverage for the elderly. The insurance-based system has created a massive overallocation of society's resources to health care. And single payer would be worse.
All of those repeal votes, including the House bill were "pretend" votes since the legislators in question had no intention of following through. I actually think we would be better off without any health insurance (link) except catastrophic coverage and maybe coverage for the elderly. The insurance-based system has created a massive overallocation of society's resources to health care. And single payer would be worse.
That's for sure.
I wonder why people assume that anything is really "free."
Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and ranking member Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) convened the hearing as one of four over the next two weeks aimed at developing limited fixes for markets that serve nearly 20 million Americans who don’t get health coverage through an employer or a government health plan.
Leaders of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, who have a reputation for pragmatism and compromise, are trying to pull together a narrowly focused, bipartisan bill this week that would have a direct and rapid effect on premiums.
Prospects for the new repeal legislation — sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — remain uncertain, but the proposal won an important endorsement Monday from a key Republican governor, Arizona’s Doug Ducey.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.