Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2011, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Maryland
15,171 posts, read 18,562,484 times
Reputation: 3044

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eleanora1 View Post
Or why you believe posters here are unable to see the light of god? I wasn't aware that God was in favor of driving without licensure or insurance. Or that illegal supporters could sound just as nutty as Pat Robertson. What bizarrely arrogant phraseology!
Yes, apparently if one opposes illegal immigration, or does not condone driving without a license, one has not seen the light of God.

 
Old 09-17-2011, 03:27 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,934,013 times
Reputation: 12828
Such laws to protect those who break from facing arrest or prosecution is only possible in the land of fruits & nuts!
 
Old 09-17-2011, 03:28 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 1,211,113 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benicar View Post
Please explain why you consider legitimate reservations to be a “ditch” level discussion.
I don't. Thinking this law would completely eliminate the requirement for a license or apply only to illegals are not legitimate reservations.
 
Old 09-17-2011, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Maryland
15,171 posts, read 18,562,484 times
Reputation: 3044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockmadinejad View Post
I don't. Thinking this law would completely eliminate the requirement for a license or apply only to illegals are not legitimate reservations.
No, it doesn’t eliminate the requirement for a license. But, it does lessen the penalty if caught. Do you honestly believe, if not for a substantial number of illegal aliens driving in CA without a license, the established DUI policy would have changed? Furthermore, a simple citation is hardly a deterrent, even if a nominal fine is attached. This new policy clearly creates a safety hazard for all driving on California roads. Do you support this policy?
 
Old 09-17-2011, 04:05 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,698,996 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benicar View Post
No, it doesn’t eliminate the requirement for a license. But, it does lessen the penalty if caught. Do you honestly believe, if not for a substantial number of illegal aliens driving in CA without a license, the established DUI policy would have changed? Furthermore, a simple citation is hardly a deterrent, even if a nominal fine is attached. This new policy clearly creates a safety hazard for all driving on California roads. Do you support this policy?
They can't give an undocumented driver a nomimal fine. Even if they were to try to give an illegal a ticket, they wouldn't have an address to send it to, they wouldn't have a name and the illegal would never have to pay the ticket.

It's a joke to think that you can put "undocumented driver" where the name normally goes on a traffic citation and believe the illegal is going to show up to pay it. The license is almost always the ONLY way the cop can identify the driver. By insisting illegals don't have to have one pretty much lets them off the hook for everything when it comes to driving.
 
Old 09-17-2011, 04:09 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,698,996 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockmadinejad View Post
The fact that there is a citation is in fact evidence that there's likely a fine, but whatevs, ya know. Surely you can assume your conclusion freely.

At the beginning of this thread malamute was claiming that this law only impacted illegals. It took multiple posts for people to understand that this was not the case, and that this was referring specifically to DUI checkpoints. And now, naturally, someone has hopped on ready to defend every assumption most favorable to their position that illegal immigrants are secretly running this nation from some sort of underground bunker while (accurately) pointing out that we should be aware when assumptions are not grounded in verifiable fact.

I enter, as I tend to, not trying to defend this given law or whatever negligible policy or event is being whined about at high pitches, but to remove the discussion from the ditch in which it resides, unable to see the light of god.
And how are you going to cite someone who has no proof of identity? Just ask the illegal for his name and address and believe he's really going to give you the correct one?
 
Old 09-17-2011, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Maryland
15,171 posts, read 18,562,484 times
Reputation: 3044
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
They can't give an undocumented driver a nomimal fine. Even if they were to try to give an illegal a ticket, they wouldn't have an address to send it to, they wouldn't have a name and the illegal would never have to pay the ticket.

It's a joke to think that you can put "undocumented driver" where the name normally goes on a traffic citation and believe the illegal is going to show up to pay it. The license is almost always the ONLY way the cop can identify the driver. By insisting illegals don't have to have one pretty much lets them off the hook for everything when it comes to driving.
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
And how are you going to cite someone who has no proof of identity? Just ask the illegal for his name and address and believe he's really going to give you the correct one?
How true. Even if fined, they won’t pay. They certainly won’t attend a hearing. So, exactly how would the state collect payments, or penalize illegals?
 
Old 09-17-2011, 04:28 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 1,211,113 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
And how are you going to cite someone who has no proof of identity? Just ask the illegal for his name and address and believe he's really going to give you the correct one?
Unless there is some clever system they have thought of, this problem is why I'd consider this to be a silly law.
 
Old 09-17-2011, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,346,222 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhymetime View Post
"I don't have an obligation to Mr. X" is not the same as "I am justified in doing whatever I want to Mr. X."

So then if you don't feel that the USA has no obligation to Mr. X then we do not have to allow him to come into our country.
 
Old 09-17-2011, 04:35 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 1,211,113 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
So then if you don't feel that the USA has no obligation to Mr. X then we do not have to allow him to come into our country.
What do you mean "have to"? I mean, the government has all the guns and power, they don't "have to" not shoot you and find themselves not guilty. They could do it, and it'd be terrible, but they don't abstain because they "have to."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top