Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Indiana > Indianapolis
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2009, 12:54 PM
 
38 posts, read 132,023 times
Reputation: 22

Advertisements

This story appeared from Indystar.com today and it says that Ballard is proposing a 9 county 1 percent sales tax increase that would benefit Indianapolis and 9 other counties. The 9 other counties can keep their amount and Indianapolis would be able to get the CIB out of a debt and still have money left over.

My question is what do you think? I think that it is a good idea and woudn't affect anyone really. I mean we tax smokers so I don't think that taxing drinkers is going to affect them. They won't care. Someone though however will blow this way out of proportion. We could be like Nashville, TN and tax the **** out of Tourists and then offer more tourist destinations. But of course that won't happen!

What do you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2009, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Indy
163 posts, read 659,873 times
Reputation: 107
I think we should institute a 15% pro sports tax. This is a state tax on incomes of professional athletes and employees of the teams that operate in Indiana. The money is put towards operating, maintaining and future construction of any facilities that are state/locally constructed and supported.

If a pro sports franchise wishes to operate/construct their own facility, then they would be exempt from the tax.

The pols need to quit stickin it to the citizens to support private business, where the only qualification for that tax support is because they are in sports entertainment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2009, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Englewood, Near Eastside Indy
8,981 posts, read 17,297,321 times
Reputation: 7377
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUSHDOG14 View Post
This story appeared from Indystar.com today and it says that Ballard is proposing a 9 county 1 percent sales tax increase that would benefit Indianapolis and 9 other counties. The 9 other counties can keep their amount and Indianapolis would be able to get the CIB out of a debt and still have money left over.

What do you think?
I think the sooner they do this, the better. Too bad the alcohol lobby is so strong and will fight this tooth and nail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2009, 01:49 PM
 
891 posts, read 2,451,027 times
Reputation: 661
Alcohol taxes have not gone up since something like 1973 in Indiana - so it is time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2009, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Western Hoosierland
17,998 posts, read 9,065,071 times
Reputation: 5943
I agree the taxes need to be risen. I hear that soft drinks are also going to be taxed but that is going to be a national thing. So expect the price of soft drinks to go up as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2009, 09:48 PM
 
Location: Fishers, IN
6,485 posts, read 12,539,085 times
Reputation: 4126
The problem I have with going straight to tax increases is that we really don't know the extent of the problem just yet. For one, the Pacers' lease has yet to be renegotiated, so we don't know for sure how much CIB will have to take on (although admittedly, it looks like the whole $15 million at this point). Secondly, it's expected that additional revenues will come once the convention center expansion is complete next year.

I would much prefer that we find a quick fix to get the CIB through the next year (Like, say, the idea someone proposed of using the huge sum of cash being hoarded by the township trustees as security), then put together an ad hoc committee ala Kernan-Shepherd to find a long-term solution that is comprehensive, creative and fair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2009, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Plainfield
77 posts, read 245,165 times
Reputation: 40
Don't like it?

Quit drinking and stop smoking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 08:07 AM
 
1,095 posts, read 3,998,954 times
Reputation: 665
I don't have a huge problem with the added tax, although there is a fundamental difference between taxes on alcohol and taxes on cigarettes. Many people who smoke are addicted and will continue to buy cigarettes regardless of how high the price goes, up to a point. And the tax on smokes is partially justified on the argument that smokers cost taxpayers money in the form of added healthcare costs, although there are some flaws with that argument.

For most drinkers, beer is discretionary, so there's no real reason to tax beer and not, say, soda. "Don't like it? Quit buying coke" wouldn't go over very well, I'm afraid. But in any event, my problem is with what the revenue is going to be used for. This tax could have been levied years ago to help replace our inadequate sewer system, or for any number of other purposes that would help the average citizen more than this CIB bailout.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2009, 05:14 AM
 
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
17,764 posts, read 39,738,186 times
Reputation: 8253
Must
Keep
Irsay
Family
Happy

Will
Move
in
the
middle
of
the night







AGAIN
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2009, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Western Hoosierland
17,998 posts, read 9,065,071 times
Reputation: 5943
lol ^^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Indiana > Indianapolis
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top