Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Congress Funded Continued FEDERAL Unemployment Insurance for the LONG TERM Unemployed?
Yes, keep the checks coming until the economy goes back to normal 52 42.98%
Stop it at 99 weeks, no longer 26 21.49%
There should be no Federally Funded Unemployment Extensions 36 29.75%
There should be no unemployment insurance for anyone State or Federal (Work or Die!) 7 5.79%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2010, 03:21 AM
 
154 posts, read 526,714 times
Reputation: 112

Advertisements

A number of people I know are unemployed and all they can talk about is the debate in Congress about FEDERALLY FUNDED EXTENDED Unemployment Coverage. These friends and relatives who are long term unemployed are nearing the end of their extended coverage and are still no closer to a job. In fact many believe that it is unlikely they will find anything in the next year or two until the recession finally ends. So they believe they should be eligible to collect unemployment benefits until the jobless rate goes back to normal.

What do you think? Should Congress find the money to somehow pay for extending the unemployment benefits for the LONG TERM UNEMPLOYED beyond the 99 week limit? Answer my poll and discuss. (I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT REGULAR STATE UNEMPLOYED BENEFITS FOR THE NEWLY UNEMPLOYED)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2010, 03:58 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,861,032 times
Reputation: 4585
Of course they should. There's not much more that can be said about that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 04:20 AM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,449,725 times
Reputation: 3647
There is precedent for this. In the past fifty years, these benefits have always been extended when unemployment is this high. It is nothing new. What is new is people using this issue to play politics, and I don't like it. This should be done as it always has been in the past, not used to try to score points in the election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 04:27 AM
 
3,875 posts, read 3,872,295 times
Reputation: 2527
Only after they deport the Illegal Aliens that take jobs away, not all of them are in the fields, there is no way that we have a need for 20 million+ crop pickers. Star with the expired 401b visa holders(high paying tech jobs). And Illegals employed at fastfood restaurants,carwashes( entry level jobs for teens and other down and out AMERICANS) and especially in the hard hit area of Construction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 05:34 AM
 
57 posts, read 81,114 times
Reputation: 57
A lot of hard luck out there, but also way too many people waiting for the perfect job...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 05:36 AM
 
3,767 posts, read 4,531,341 times
Reputation: 1395
We are becoming The Netherlands. lol. Where more people will soon be on unemployment than work. Our country cannot support this and we will soon be so in debt that we have no power but are in debted to China and are basically owned. Obviously a lot of people are deceived and do not understand this.

Let charity begin at home, not in our government. So many people do not understand the purpose of our government. it is not to provided money to those who don't work. People need to educate themselves. The results so far in this poll just show how many people do not understand how gov't and entitlements work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 05:37 AM
 
4,399 posts, read 10,673,812 times
Reputation: 2383
Quote:
Originally Posted by email_lover View Post
A number of people I know are unemployed and all they can talk about is the debate in Congress about FEDERALLY FUNDED EXTENDED Unemployment Coverage. These friends and relatives who are long term unemployed are nearing the end of their extended coverage and are still no closer to a job. In fact many believe that it is unlikely they will find anything in the next year or two until the recession finally ends. So they believe they should be eligible to collect unemployment benefits until the jobless rate goes back to normal.

What do you think? Should Congress find the money to somehow pay for extending the unemployment benefits for the LONG TERM UNEMPLOYED beyond the 99 week limit? Answer my poll and discuss. (I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT REGULAR STATE UNEMPLOYED BENEFITS FOR THE NEWLY UNEMPLOYED)
I am all for unemployment extensions for those who are having a hard time. However 99 weeks? That is nearly two years. I cannot fathom how you can make it much longer. At that point people are nearly unemployable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 05:46 AM
 
814 posts, read 670,588 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Booya View Post
We are becoming The Netherlands. lol. Where more people will soon be on unemployment than work. Our country cannot support this and we will soon be so in debt that we have no power but are in debted to China and are basically owned. Obviously a lot of people are deceived and do not understand this.

Let charity begin at home, not in our government. So many people do not understand the purpose of our government. it is not to provided money to those who don't work. People need to educate themselves. The results so far in this poll just show how many people do not understand how gov't and entitlements work.
You are mistaken if you think we can step back and have a "less is more" attitude" towards government. I'll admit that there is too much corruption on both sides, but clearly corporations have consolidated our society much further than we ever imagined. The only thing that will get this country back on track is if we strip corporate money out of DC,reduce military funding, and bring back manufacturing. If this fails the only thing left is higher taxes (like every civilized country in the world) and more socialistic policies. We need to stop the people that want to further consolidate our middle class. Capitalism has expired(.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 05:49 AM
 
3,767 posts, read 4,531,341 times
Reputation: 1395
The sad truth is this; most people do not start looking for a job, or more pointedly will no accept a job until the benefits run out regardless of how long they receive them. If it is 6 months or 2 years. Because most will be settling in their mind and would rather take a hand out at $250.00 a week than work for $400 a week.

A sad commentary on a lot of people's work ethic but so true. And I have seen it time and time again. I knew a gal who worked in a call center and make 15 an hour. She got layed off and was offered $10 an hour at another call center. She said, I am worth a lot more than that. Same job type it is just that she was making $15 an hour because she had been there for years. No eduation needed but she would not take the job.

People have skewed views of their "worth" in most cases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2010, 05:53 AM
 
3,767 posts, read 4,531,341 times
Reputation: 1395
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal77 View Post
You are mistaken if you think we can step back and have a "less is more" attitude" towards government.. . .
If this fails the only thing left is higher taxes (like every civilized country in the world) and more socialistic policies. We need to stop the people that want to further consolidate our middle class. Capitalism has expired(.)
Oh, capitalism has expired and "the only thing left is higher taxes like every civilized country."

So a mark of a civilized country is higher taxes? Just goes to show how skewed your thinking has become and how you have bought into the left wing media hook line and sinker. I am really sad that you think higher taxes and bigger gov't is the only way to solve our countries problems. It hasn't worked in Europe I would think you could see that.

If you think higher taxes is the only way, to tax our way out of our problems you are deceived. Clearly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top