Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-31-2011, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,229,228 times
Reputation: 2536

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Exactly, so people also need to acknowledge that this doctor, who is a renegade and a criminal, does not represent legal abortion providers.
The pro abortionist will say there is a different between legally killing and illegal killing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2011, 09:43 AM
 
Location: THE USA
3,257 posts, read 6,129,903 times
Reputation: 1998
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
The pro abortionist will say there is a different between legally killing and illegal killing.
Well by law after 24 weeks is murder and by my own opinion I think after 22 weeks is as well. But but but, they don't do ultrasounds til 20 wks or more for abnormalities, so if you have a baby with no brain or other defects which don't present until later development, you should have the right to end the pregnancy up until whenever the defects are found out. If you don't find out until 30weeks there is no spine or something, You can abort then. For healthy babies I believe 22 weeks is plenty of time to know you don't want it.

This man lied to women who thought they were within their legal rights. The one who died was not committing a crime. Many women, had they known they were past the limit, would opt to not have one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2011, 10:33 PM
 
Location: Durham, NC
2,622 posts, read 3,152,470 times
Reputation: 3620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Exactly, so people also need to acknowledge that this doctor, who is a renegade and a criminal, does not represent legal abortion providers.
The only difference is he's doing it later instead of earlier. It's a sad thing that the law sees a young developing baby as not human until a certain point. "It" has a heartbeat, brainwaves, movement, etc. What is "it", a rock, a piece of newspaper, something else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 02:43 AM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,057,064 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmellc View Post
The only difference is he's doing it later instead of earlier. It's a sad thing that the law sees a young developing baby as not human until a certain point. "It" has a heartbeat, brainwaves, movement, etc. What is "it", a rock, a piece of newspaper, something else?
It is a fetus. It has the potential to become a baby. It is a fetus when it is aborted, not a baby.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2014, 02:39 PM
 
1 posts, read 550 times
Reputation: 11
Abortion should be legal at any stage of the pregnancy. An adult life and happiness is more important than the life of a bunch of organized cells (foetus, baby) unable to think nor to decide. Life is such a common thing in humanity (more than 7 billions of humans) that we should wisely decide to a minimal reproduction process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2014, 01:20 AM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,523,461 times
Reputation: 7472
No one says it is just a bunch of cells anymore, not when modern science tells us differently. Some just do not want to accept it but the abortionist does. He will tell you he is killing a baby.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2014, 02:29 AM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,057,064 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
No one says it is just a bunch of cells anymore, not when modern science tells us differently. Some just do not want to accept it but the abortionist does. He will tell you he is killing a baby.
Link?

And please, an unbiased source, not Life News.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2014, 08:58 AM
 
59,132 posts, read 27,349,464 times
Reputation: 14290
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
Funny how those "conservative, family values, pro-life" Republican's didn't introduce a single, solitary bill to overturn Roe v. Wade during the 6 years they held complete control of the federal government and could have passed anything they wanted, nor did Fox push them to do so.

In fact, as I recall, the subject never came up.

Why should they?

DuH, the Supreme Court already ruled on R vs. W

I am NOT surprised you didn't know that.

I am so glad some repubs have values.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2014, 05:50 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,523,461 times
Reputation: 7472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Link?

And please, an unbiased source, not Life News.
Why would you not like Life News? Would it be because they were spot on with the Kermit Gosnell reports when all other news outlets ignored it and wished it would go away? Ole, Kermit knew he killed babies, even after they were born, didn't matter to him. Killed the women and mained them for life as well, all in a day's work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2014, 02:08 AM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,057,064 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
Why would you not like Life News? Would it be because they were spot on with the Kermit Gosnell reports when all other news outlets ignored it and wished it would go away? Ole, Kermit knew he killed babies, even after they were born, didn't matter to him. Killed the women and mained them for life as well, all in a day's work.
Because Life News is extremely biased, short on facts, long on fiction.

Kermit Gosnell broke the law, just like thousands of priests who broke the law.

Kermit Gosnell doesn't represent legal abortion anymore than those priests represent religion.

Using your line of thinking.....all religion should be banned because some use it to victimize others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top