Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you sue a restaurant if they accidently served your 1 year old liquor?
Yes 20 27.03%
No 54 72.97%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2011, 06:58 AM
 
Location: DFW Texas
3,127 posts, read 7,631,900 times
Reputation: 2256

Advertisements

I think the restaurant was set up. I mean really? Margarita is a very different flavor than apple juice, wouldnt the parents notice the child had a strange face. Or as few of you have mentioned, the parent should have checked first.

I have waited tables before and let me tell you, there are all types out there just looking for a free meal or a buck. And it IS Applebee's, not exactly "Fine Dining", so I can just imagine the kind of trash customers that go there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2011, 08:27 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,317,854 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by imcurious View Post
A one-year old is still a baby. There is NO WAY the parents should have not known what their BABY was imbibing.
They did know their child wasn't acting right and they took him to the emergency room. That's how they found out their child was legally drunk.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
It seems to me that parents should sip the baby's drink to test it first.

I think someone should have called Child Protective Services to report these dumb parents. The parents should lose their baby.
What parent is in the habit of sipping their baby's drink first to test it? Not many, I'd guess.

They should lose their baby for taking them to an Applebee's? Talk about a police state that oversteps. There is no law against taking a child to a restaurants that serves drinks. It was a mistake, an accident, on the part of the restaurant. Why should the parents be held responsible for that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TXTwizter View Post
I think the restaurant was set up. I mean really? Margarita is a very different flavor than apple juice, wouldnt the parents notice the child had a strange face. Or as few of you have mentioned, the parent should have checked first.

I have waited tables before and let me tell you, there are all types out there just looking for a free meal or a buck. And it IS Applebee's, not exactly "Fine Dining", so I can just imagine the kind of trash customers that go there.
Wow, Applebee's is not the kind of place that attracts "trash customers." I can't believe you said that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2011, 08:35 AM
 
Location: DFW Texas
3,127 posts, read 7,631,900 times
Reputation: 2256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Wow, Applebee's is not the kind of place that attracts "trash customers." I can't believe you said that.

I worked at one in Groton, CT....customers, TRASH. I attempted to eat lunch at one in Dallas, TX.....customers, GHETTO TRASH. I was talked into going to the one here in town, Waco, TX....customers, GHETTO & TRAILER TRASH.

Why would you be shocked about me saying that? I call it like I see it, sorry if you can't handle it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2011, 08:41 AM
 
4,428 posts, read 4,483,743 times
Reputation: 1356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat
It seems to me that parents should sip the baby's drink to test it first.

I think someone should have called Child Protective Services to report these dumb parents. The parents should lose their baby.




Yeah, I said that - to get a rise out of all of you already outraged people.


This will get you upset too.


If you must be 18 to enter a bar, because it serves alcohol, why should kids be able to enter restaurants that serve alcohol?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2011, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,753,051 times
Reputation: 9330
"blood alcohol content of 0.10 — above Michigan’s drunk-driving limit of 0.08."

So, don't let the kid drive home. Remember, "Kids don't let kids drive drunk"..... or something like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2011, 08:46 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,317,854 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXTwizter View Post
I worked at one in Groton, CT....customers, TRASH. I attempted to eat lunch at one in Dallas, TX.....customers, GHETTO TRASH. I was talked into going to the one here in town, Waco, TX....customers, GHETTO & TRAILER TRASH.

Why would you be shocked about me saying that? I call it like I see it, sorry if you can't handle it.
I'm shocked because I've been in six different Applebee's---quite frequently---and they are all in upper-middle class neighborhoods and they attract a lot office type working people on their lunch hour or on their way home. I have never, ever seen trash behavior in any of their restaurants. Their prices are also not low enough to attract a lot of trailer trash types.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2011, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,228,339 times
Reputation: 7428
Simply suing over the loss or violation of a loved one is petty and greedy. I'd want some type of explanation or reasoning for it followed with an apology and a refund. No need to sue over that; however, if it was intentionally; I'd take legal action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2011, 08:50 AM
 
Location: California
11,466 posts, read 19,357,057 times
Reputation: 12713
nope I wouldn't sue, it happened to us once, my son made a face when he tasted it, the waitress was sorry no harm done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2011, 08:50 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,618,904 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by jluke65780 View Post
Simply suing over the loss or violation of a loved one is petty and greedy. I'd want some type of explanation or reasoning for it followed with an apology and a refund. No need to sue over that; however, if it was intentionally; I'd take legal action.
If your actions cause my toddler to become tipsy, I don't see it as unreasonable to sue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2011, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,228,339 times
Reputation: 7428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
If your actions cause my toddler to become tipsy, I don't see it as unreasonable to sue.
What are you trying to get out of it though??? The fact that my child is fine and healthy is good enough for me [I have no kids though]. I feel no need to try and take advantage of the situation and get money out of it. That's just being greedy and selfish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top