Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The bottom line is that Pro-Abortionists don't want to have to face up to their decisions because looking at a fetus on an ultrasound would force them to deal with the consequences of their irresponsible actions.
Nowhere in this thread have I seen one single Pro-Abortionist argue for Front Side Personal Responsibility.
Instead, front side personal responsiblity is a total inconvenience as asserted by the comments on this thread. Killiing a fetus, however, is considered personal responsbility.
I would have no problem with that. I don't want the kid. End of discussion. Fine, want me to watch it on tv? Okay. Can I sign the paperwork now? I don't want 9 months of pregnancy. I don't want the child, or to deal with anything to do with it. It won't bother me a bit to have to watch a monitor for a few minutes.
I would have no problem with that. I don't want the kid. End of discussion. Fine, want me to watch it on tv? Okay. Can I sign the paperwork now? I don't want 9 months of pregnancy. I don't want the child, or to deal with anything to do with it. It won't bother me a bit to have to watch a monitor for a few minutes.
That is how it would seem to me...if you had made up your mind,why would it be so easily swayed by some grainy picture?
I would have no problem with that. I don't want the kid. End of discussion. Fine, want me to watch it on tv? Okay. Can I sign the paperwork now? I don't want 9 months of pregnancy. I don't want the child, or to deal with anything to do with it. It won't bother me a bit to have to watch a monitor for a few minutes.
Did you ever stop to think that you could have NOT gotten pregnant by taking the appropriate precautions?
Of course you didn't. Asking you to take personal responsbility on the front side is asking you to do WAY too much.
Did you ever stop to think that you could have NOT gotten pregnant by taking the appropriate precautions?
Of course you didn't. Asking you to take personal responsbility on the front side is asking you to do WAY too much.
I find that to be digusting.
The only birth control that's 100% effective is abstinence. A female can be abstinent yet still be raped or forced into incest that results in a pregnancy.
How would such victims "take responsibility" in such situations? (As if this hasn't come up 20 or 30 times in this thread already.)
Did you ever stop to think that you could have NOT gotten pregnant by taking the appropriate precautions?
Of course you didn't. Asking you to take personal responsbility on the front side is asking you to do WAY too much.
I find that to be digusting.
How about the male side of this equation. How about asking HIM to take personal responsibility on the front side - or is that asking him to do WAY too much?? Do you find the behavior of men who are sexually irresponsible to also be disgusting?
A woman can become impregnated only once a year. A man can impregnate dozens of women a year. Which of the two should be more conscientious about birth control?
Last edited by ray1945; 10-28-2011 at 06:21 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
