Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's photo-shopped; doctors don't usually photograph their work. If a pro-life
physician did this, he's far worse than a pregnant woman with eclampsia or
gestational hypertension. It's a sick post from a sick mind.
The abortion doctor in Philly kept some of the fetal remains in jars in his office.
I believe he kept their feet...might be wrong it was a while back.
He also performed abortions in the 3rd trimester if the woman wanted.
It's photo-shopped; doctors don't usually photograph their work. If a pro-life
physician did this, he's far worse than a pregnant woman with eclampsia or
gestational hypertension. It's a sick post from a sick mind.
I doubt any doctor would photograph a late term abortion. anti choice can post all the pictures they want. it does not change a person's mind the believes in choice.
women are not breeding machines and have the right to reproductive freedom. we have the right not to look at ultrasounds that is redundant to say the least.
PUUUUUULLLLLLEEEEEEEAAAASSSSSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
More deaths from guns than terminations....... go lobby against guns.
As i said before........ up to a certain point in a pregnancy...NO LIFE HAS BEEN FORMED..... got it yet NO LIFE.... just cells dividing.
Now anyone can find awful cases of bad terminations but with proper regulation the women can go get a early termination wich meand NO loss of life and NO unwanted child that lives a life of living hell.
Cells which divide are not alive? Again with the extraterrestrial reasoning.
Living hell -- RIGHT. That's where the SCOTUS that gave us this abomination needs to be. And probably is.
Do you know how many women have gotten away with murder in this country?
Do you mean like the countless babies killed with bombing their asses??????? Haven't heard any religous right wingers upset about that when America goes to war.
This is utterly specious; it has everything to do with the woman (or girl's) body because the fetus is attached to said body via the umbilical cord, which takes nutrients and antibodies from the uterus to the fetus. That being said, have you ever seen a baby born with the brain and spinal cord outside the skull and spinal column? Have you ever seen an infant with shaken baby syndrome? Greenstick fractures from beatings? Burned with cigarettes? As a nurse I saw all of the above and more; there's no way that a loving God would want an innocent child to suffer in such ways. It's been made implicitly clear to you; now it's just trolling. Rape, incest, the mother's health or accident, the decision will never be yours to make. As Rita Mordio says, when we can keep a fetus alive through a medical uterus (or donor uterus), the issue will be moot. How about we neuter males at 13, while keeping frozen sperm samples? Then when he's older, in a stable marriage and financially able, the sperm can be withdrawn and a wanted pregnancy will occur. That takes the onus from the woman and makes it an issue of agreement between partners, and pro-lifers (as if anyone is "pro-death") can find a different control issue to obsess over.
The only ones who complain about abortion are people who are living.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
