Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2012, 08:43 AM
 
994 posts, read 725,041 times
Reputation: 449

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
Why don't we just "easternize" and convert our form of government to a theocracy?

Why should THEY change to be like us in order to avoid conflict? Why can't WE change instead?
Uh...maybe because we're the society that values life and freedom and they're the repressive theocracy?

I get your point about seeing things from other perspectives, but when one society is deciding whether homosexuals should get civil unions or full marriages while the other one is deciding whether they should be buried waist deep or neck deep before you stone them to death, is there really a moral equivalency there?

Plus, I'm pretty sure the comment about westernizing was referring to how similar to Americans they already seemed in their dress and cars and manner of speaking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2012, 08:51 AM
 
4,127 posts, read 5,067,345 times
Reputation: 1621
All roads lead to Rome, eh? That worked out so well for the Romans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,645 posts, read 38,651,238 times
Reputation: 11780
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Joe, I think the Iranian people are, and have been, ready to westernize. They don't control the government so even rioting won't work, at least as long as the US has President who won't help them when they do try.
If he did help them, you'd be calling him a warmonger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,645 posts, read 38,651,238 times
Reputation: 11780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kkaos2 View Post
Uh...maybe because we're the society that values life and freedom and they're the repressive theocracy?

I get your point about seeing things from other perspectives, but when one society is deciding whether homosexuals should get civil unions or full marriages while the other one is deciding whether they should be buried waist deep or neck deep before you stone them to death, is there really a moral equivalency there?

Plus, I'm pretty sure the comment about westernizing was referring to how similar to Americans they already seemed in their dress and cars and manner of speaking.
The Republicans have been trying to change that for the past 30 years now..........they like the way the Ayatollahs run things over there and want to transfer that energy to America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 09:52 AM
 
Location: USA
31,050 posts, read 22,077,427 times
Reputation: 19085
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
The c's are trying their best to do that in the US these days.
No difference.

Being western isn't always the best thing to be.
"Being western isn't always the best thing to be"
Yes it is. Every Region, Country and Culture in the world thinks theirs is the best, it's just human nature. How to tell which is the best: See how many people want to move there!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 02:05 PM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,745,361 times
Reputation: 9728
What is the West anyway? There are huge differences between Brazil, Britain, the US, Spain, Finland etc.

I guess one of the few things we all have in common in the West is our secular laws, which I support. That however would be one of the most difficult aspects to implement in Iran. The leadership will defend the Islamic supremacy at all cost as they know that many Iranians are rather open-minded, much more so than Saudis etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 04:49 PM
 
674 posts, read 698,516 times
Reputation: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebaldknobber View Post
It's not my concern, but it would be nice to see a civilized country in that part of the world.
On western civilization Ghandi famously said "It would be a good idea." I don't agree with him on much other than this phrase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 06:19 PM
 
2,652 posts, read 8,582,247 times
Reputation: 1915
How can they "westernize" when the west keeps putting crippling sanctions on them and promising war in the near future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 06:29 PM
 
1,724 posts, read 1,471,430 times
Reputation: 780
It is called Operation Ajax. However, many Americans are ignorant of the fact that Iran tried to Westernize on their own by being the first Middle East country to hold a democratically election that resulted in a freedom, loving secularist.

However, Mossadegh didn't care for the British oil companies who were raping his home country. After all, Britain was living high off the hog, while Iranians were receiving wages to support Western opulence. So, he decided to nationalize that oil companies.

However, Churchill didn't like this so he rallied up the aid of the Americans (Eisenhower) and the CIA to overthrow the freedom loving Mossadegh and install a puppet regime. This puppet regime consisted of the Shah. The Shah was backed by the SAVAK, who were the Iranian secret police that tortured political dissenters using Nazi torture tactics taught to them by the CIA and Mossad.

After decades of oppression by the Shah, the SAVAK, and "freedom" loving Western countries, Iranians decided to overthrow their government in 1979 from the same embassy that the CIA/Mossad planned the coup of Mossadegh.

The moral of the story: Iran was westernizing until American ****ed it up.

Last edited by A Common Anomaly; 02-17-2012 at 07:44 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,530,289 times
Reputation: 7807
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Common Anomaly View Post
It is called Operation Ajax. However, many Americans are ignorant of the fact, that Iran tried to Western on their own by being the first Middle East country to hold a democratically election that resulted in a freedom, loving secularist.

However, Mossadegh didn't care for the British oil companies who were raping his home country. After all, Britain was living high off the hog, while Iranians were receiving wages to support Western opulence. So, he decided to nationalize that oil companies.

However, Churchill didn't like this so he rallied up the aid of the Americans (Eisenhower) and the CIA to overthrow the freedom loving Mossadegh and install a puppet regime. This puppet regime consisted of the Shah. The Shah was backed by the SAVAK, who were the Iranian secret police that tortured political dissenters using Nazi torture tactics taught to them by the CIA and Mossad.

After decades of oppression by the Shah, the SAVAK, and "freedom" loving Western countries, Iranians decided to overthrow their government in 1979 from the same embassy that the CIA/Mossad planned the coup of Mossadegh.

The moral of the story: Iran was westernizing until American ****ed it up.

There's a little more to that story. Mossadegh was also being courted by the German's to cut off the flow of goods across Iran into the Soviet Union. And, it looked like that courting was about to pay off. Since the majority of our aid to the Soviets at that time was going through Iran, the Allies could not take the chance of it being ended. Incidently, that was an important reason that Britain occupied Iraq too, at about the same time.

I'm not saying that was the primary reason for his overthrow, or that the Pahlavi family were sterling characters. I'm just pointing out that the coup had bigger implications as well.

By the way...does anybody know who built Savak for the Shah?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top