Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-16-2012, 07:53 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,221,200 times
Reputation: 18824

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
That makes absolutely no sense.
The irony of this post^^.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2012, 08:01 AM
 
2,635 posts, read 3,512,720 times
Reputation: 1686
Quote:
Originally Posted by aus10 View Post
The thing with this is.. that those who pay less (and I'm not saying they shouldn't).. have the same exact things provided for them as well, and then some. So expanding your list... to include entitlement programs...

1. Food Stamps
2. Section 8
3. Energy Assistance
4. TANIF
5. WIC
6. Medicaid
7. Free cell phones
8. Childcare Assistance (although may be on State Level?)
9. Earned Income credit (which I think should only be allowed up to tax liability)

So easily there are 9 more areas which are being paid for by someone else. Now, am I saying that they aren't necessary. No. But, given the fact that you listed 11 things that I pay for and I've added 9 more, and the fact that I pay a butt-load more than anyone receiving any of those 9, who's being ungrateful? And who's being a cheapskate?

Look, I'm not trying to be a cheapskate... but the fact remains that there are those of us who sometimes pay more in a year than most people do in 20. And not from investments or capital gains... but from the sweat of our brow. Earned Income. And while we understand that there are those who NEED.. and we are glad to assist.. we also understand that there are those who TAKE. And to put it quite bluntly.. we're sick of it. And we're sick of being told that we don't do enough and getting called ungrateful cheapskates.
Last year I paid AMT (ouch), so I know all about the uneven tax burden. The three biggest items in the federal budget are:
1) Defense
2) Social Security
2) Medicare and Medicaid

Combined these are more than 60% of the budget, and are the main drivers of the deficit. (see United States federal budget - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia for the source of my numbers)

All the items I've mentioned, and the entitlements you included, are considered discrectionary and other mandatory spending. These are just 40% of the budget. The issue is that people tend to focus on some welfare spending and believe it is much larger than it really is. Here are the numbers for 2012: 2012 United States federal budget - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services is $139B, or just 3.6% of the entire budget.

The real question is why some elected leaders keep harping on 3.6% of the budget while not addressing the real issues that are driving deficit spending?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,145,129 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
Last year I paid AMT (ouch), so I know all about the uneven tax burden. The three biggest items in the federal budget are:
1) Defense
2) Social Security
2) Medicare and Medicaid

Combined these are more than 60% of the budget, and are the main drivers of the deficit. (see United States federal budget - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia for the source of my numbers)

All the items I've mentioned, and the entitlements you included, are considered discrectionary and other mandatory spending. These are just 40% of the budget. The issue is that people tend to focus on some welfare spending and believe it is much larger than it really is. Here are the numbers for 2012: 2012 United States federal budget - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services is $139B, or just 3.6% of the entire budget.

The real question is why some elected leaders keep harping on 3.6% of the budget while not addressing the real issues that are driving deficit spending?

AMT is a big sore spot with me. We have on occasion got hit very very hard due to Schedule A. And that's where it gets even trickier. Everyone keeps saying... take away the tax breaks for those above certain income levels. What so many fail to realize is that those same "breaks" can actually cause you to pay more tax!!

While I agree that there are big pieces of the pie that need fixed, but nobody who ever ran a successful business nor family budget will ever tell you that the penny's, nickles, and dimes don't matter either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 08:26 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,745,293 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
The real question is why some elected leaders keep harping on 3.6% of the budget while not addressing the real issues that are driving deficit spending?
Because no one can cut Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, or defense, and still get re-elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 08:33 AM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,982,916 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt1984 View Post
So you are saying you have never received anything from anyone else? So clueless.
Nothing that's been taken by force from someone else, then given to me as if I am entitled to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 08:35 AM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,982,916 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
If your breakfast didn't kill you because it had to pass government food inspection, then you are a recipient.
If your health is not degraded from lead and pollutants in the air thanks to government regulations, then you are a recipient.
If your children didn't die from diarrhea because they drink clean water from public utilities, then you are a recipient.
If you got to work this morning using a public roadway, then you are a recipient.
If your car didn't kill or maim you thanks to government safety standards, then you are a recipient.
If your boss has to give you safety equipment, regular breaks, and reasonable compensation due to labor laws, then you are a recipient.
If you can transact business in the world's most reliable and trusted currency, the dollar, then you are a recipient.
If your bank can't fold in the middle of the night and take all your savings due to banking laws, then you are a recipient.
If you or your children have ever attended a public school or college, then you are a recipient.
If you have ever used emergency paramedic, fire, or police services, then you are a recipient.
If you or your parents use Medicare to access medical treatment, then you are a recipient.

If you take everything I mentioned above for granted and whine about how unfair your tax burden is, then you are an ungrateful cheapskate.
How exactly did society survive all of these things before government intrusion.....I mean intervention?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 08:39 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,134,648 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
Last year I paid AMT (ouch), so I know all about the uneven tax burden. The three biggest items in the federal budget are:
1) Defense
2) Social Security
2) Medicare and Medicaid

Combined these are more than 60% of the budget, and are the main drivers of the deficit. (see United States federal budget - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia for the source of my numbers)

All the items I've mentioned, and the entitlements you included, are considered discrectionary and other mandatory spending. These are just 40% of the budget. The issue is that people tend to focus on some welfare spending and believe it is much larger than it really is. Here are the numbers for 2012: 2012 United States federal budget - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services is $139B, or just 3.6% of the entire budget.

The real question is why some elected leaders keep harping on 3.6% of the budget while not addressing the real issues that are driving deficit spending?
The total amount of spending is not the issue. Debts and deficits are not the issue. Why do you insist on deflecting?

The issue is the scope and scale of transfer payments, and the growing number of people who receive these transfer payments.

Perhaps you should study up on what a transfer payment is instead of harping on the larger budget picture. When you figure out what it all means, then maybe you'll begin to understand what the OP is (rightfully) railing against.

Here's a 101 Class for you. Not all encompassing, but surely a good starter for you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_payment

http://wallstreetpit.com/82722-all-o...nsfer-payments

http://isharesblog.com/blog/2011/09/07/the-transfer-payment-paradox/ (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 08:46 AM
 
2,635 posts, read 3,512,720 times
Reputation: 1686
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
How exactly did society survive all of these things before government intrusion.....I mean intervention?
There are still plenty of places in this world where people survive without these services. I mentioned Haiti and Somalia, there are many other places in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Don't think that the Quality of Life we enjoy in the U.S. is a benign accident. It takes deliberate effort, with an associated cost, to create a country where people thrive and prosper instead of just survive (your word).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,145,129 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
It takes deliberate effort, with an associated cost, to create a country where people thrive and prosper instead of just survive (your word).
Doesn't it also therefore, take a deliberate effort on the individuals part to thrive, prosper and not just survive? We seem to penalize those who give that effort at a much greater clip than those who are doing nothing but standing with their hands out. I don't have a problem with hand-ups... but hand-outs have become the norm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 09:11 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,060,276 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWatson13 View Post
Did you wake up in the morning and think this was new or brilliant?
Well, it's obviously above your comprehension.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top