Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-29-2012, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,653 posts, read 6,130,209 times
Reputation: 3368

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isitmeorarethingsnuts? View Post
So you actually CAN be against a minority candidate without being a racist? Good to know!
Wow, and you continue with this nonsense... Everyone already knows this...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2012, 03:40 PM
 
5,036 posts, read 5,135,940 times
Reputation: 2356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minethatbird View Post
Well let's see ..... we have BO deciding he's not going to follow immigration laws if he doesn't feel like it.

We have his AG deciding he's not going to obey supeonas if he doesn't feel like it.

Maybe Gov Jindal is following the example set by those in Washington.
This.

The left is unbelievable. Obama has come damn close to committing impeachable offenses. He disregards or skirts the law. And the left cheer him on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 03:54 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,529,473 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
Obama is unlikely to win the election with his approval in the mid 40's given that no incumbent president running for re-election since Carter in 1980 has overperformed his approval rating in terms of the percentage of the vote he received (I still think Romney's chances are about 50/50 and Obama's chances are also, of course, about 50/50 for whatever reason...but you Obama supporters seem to be clueless about this reality). Even Democrats are now starting to realize Obama could lose. This is from the liberals' beloved HuffingtonPost: Dems: Obama Could Lose, Donors Better Get Moving

And, the GOP is very likely to have 50 senators even if Obama wins the election (and all it takes is 51 OR 50 plus a Republican VP to pass legislation repealing it using the reconciliation process...Dems could not filibuster), not that it would matter if Obama won the election though. And chances are virtually none for the Democrats to take back the House. And, if Romney is elected, even if Democrats were to control the House and/or Senate - the law provides that the president can simply issue waivers to states - and Romney has said that he would simply issue waivers on his first day in office to all 50 states.
So what about the uninsured? What plan does romney have for them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 06:01 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,677,756 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
States are allowed to opt-out as I understand the law to be written.
That would be smart -- states should go with the opt-out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 06:02 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,677,756 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
And he'll lose federal funding for his fine state.
Dumb choice, but his to make.
Wrong -- but if Obama decides to withhold all federal funding, then no one in Lousiana should be required to pay any federal income tax. It's time the states take a stand for their citizens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,653 posts, read 6,130,209 times
Reputation: 3368
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Wrong -- but if Obama decides to withhold all federal funding, then no one in Lousiana should be required to pay any federal income tax. It's time the states take a stand for their citizens.
Ha Ha, funny... The last states that tried standing up to the federal government didn't turn out to well...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 06:25 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,677,756 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
Ha Ha, funny... The last states that tried standing up to the federal government didn't turn out to well...
Oh no, you are very wrong. States like California and Illiniois are opting out of the federal drug laws and getting by with doing that. And states like California have opted out of the federal immigration laws, and harbor illegals.

If a state can opt out of one law for whatever reason, then other states should have the same option to opt out of laws that don't suit them. Can't have it both ways you know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 06:37 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,476,176 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
My healthcare plan is the one provided by my employer.

Now answer one for me - why should the middle class pay for healthcare for those that DON'T pay?
They have been paying this for many many years...it's called medicaid and it been around for ages. It''s not new for Obamacare.

What's new for Obamacare is the 'exchanges'. These allow regular folks to PURCHASE health insurance without having to rely on their employer for this. Someone that is 62 and retired and has enough money where they don't need to work. But they can't get medicare until 65. They'll pick a health plan from the exchange, sign up for it and then pay the monthly premium. It similar to having a list of health plans every year like your employer lets you choose from. But there will be many more choices.

The states are supposed to set up these exchanges and this is separate from the medicaid expansion issue that was ruled by SCOTUS where states can opt out of medicaid expansion. If the states don't set up the exchanges, the feds will step in and offer this for the state's residents las per current. Not sure if the feds charge the states for this but likely they charge the states.

Basically the exchanges are lists of health insurance plans and costs and ways for you to sign up and then you get billed and you pay the premium.

Last edited by sware2cod; 06-29-2012 at 06:50 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 06:42 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,476,176 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
What are you talking about? Bobby Jindal is clearly differentiating himself and a Rubio pick will ensure Florida goes GOP...
NOT. Florida does not really give a hoot about Rubio. He' too new and really hasn't done anything. He just talks fast and sounds like he is reading. He goes on national TV shows. He's not well liked in the state like some former FL politicians. He won the senate with 49% of vote less than 2 years ago. that whole time he has been groomed for VP and treated like the next big thing just because he is young and dashing and hispanic. He'll fall flat on his face and will ensure a landside win for Obama. He's about as smart a VP choice as Palin was. All talk, no experience, good attack dog, looks nice. Nothing more. Oh, Palin is a much more charismatic speaker than Rubio. He cannot energize and audience...he puts them to sleep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 06:42 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,019,659 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
They have been paying this for many many years...it's called medicaid and it been around for ages. It''s not new for Obamacare.

What's new for Obamacare is the 'exchanges'. These allow regular folks to PURCHASE health insurance without having to rely on their employer for this. Someone that is 62 and retired and has enough money where they don't need to work. But they can't get medicare until 65. They'll pick a health plan from the exchange, sign up for it and then pay the monthly premium. It similar to having a list of health plans every year like your employer lets you choose from. But there will be many more choices.
Actually, you left out the part that was just struck down by the Supreme Court. Obamacare would grossly inflate the Medicaid system. This would amount to an additional 15 million on this expanded Medicaid. In other words, we, as the taxpayers, would be paying for an additional 15 million people to have free healthcare.

For the remaining people, you have the exchanges. Well, that would be partially paid through gov't subsidies depending on income level, which we, the taxpayers, would also pay for. That's what those exchanges entail, in case you didn't get the full truth from Obama and didn't know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top